Development of a smart reconfigurable reflector prototype for an extremely high-frequency antenna

Abstract

A prototype for a space-borne smart reconfigurable reflector, whose reflector surface can be changed intentionally using surface adjustment actuators, has been developed, and its performance was evaluated through experiments. The smart reconfigurable reflector was designed as a sub-reflector of a space antenna for observations in the extremely highfrequency band (frequency range: 30 -300 GHz) and is used for correcting the path length errors in the antenna system caused by surface deformations of the main reflector. It consists of a solid surface, supporting members, and surface adjustment actuators. The surface adjustment actuators are a key part of the smart reconfigurable reflector, and each consists of a piezoelectric stack actuator and a displacement magnifying mechanism. Functional tests were performed in order to investigate the performance of the actuator. The results indicate that the actuator has a stroke of more than 0.9 mm with an accuracy of 0.01 mm and a force of more than 90 N. The control accuracy was much better than the required surface accuracy for an extremely high-frequency antenna system. The effectiveness of the developed reflector system was demonstrated through numerical simulations and shape modification experiments. In order to clarify the effectiveness of the developed smart reconfigurable reflector, the performance of the antenna system, equipped with the smart reconfigurable reflector, was evaluated. The experimental results confirmed the performance expected from the numerical simulation and indicated that the antenna could be adequately controlled as expected.

Keywords

Reconfigurable reflector space antenna shape control piezoelectric actuator high-accuracy antenna

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belvin

Edighoffer

Herstrom

(1989) Quasistatic shape adjustment of a 15-m-diameter-space antenna. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 26: 129–136.

Bradford

Agnes

Ohara

. (2012) Piezocomposite actuator arrays for correcting and controlling wavefront error in reflectors. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Honolulu, HI, 23–26 April, AIAA 2012-1743, pp. 1–15. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Clarricoats

PJB

Zhou

(1991) Design and performance of a reconfigurable mesh reflector antenna. IEE Proceedings: H Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 138(6): 485–496.

Datashvili

Baier

Wei

. (2010) Mechanical investigations of in-space-reconfigurable reflecting surfaces. In: 32nd ESA antenna workshop on antennas for space applications, Noordwijk, 5–8 October, pp. 1–8. Paris, France: ESA.

Doi

Kono

Kimura

. (2013) Study on a Balloon-borne VLBI mission. In: Balloon symposium, Sagamihara, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan, 6–7 November, isas13-sbs-025, pp. 1–4 (in Japanese).

Fang

Quijano

Bach

. (2011) Experimental study of a membrane antenna surface adaptive control system. In: 52nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Denver, CO, AIAA 2011-1828, pp. 1–10. Reston, VA: AIAA.

Iwasa

Hiramatsu

. (2014) An error elimination method for surface shape measurement with grating projection method. In: 57th space sciences and technology conference, 1K15, Tottori, Japan, 9–11 October, pp. 1–5 (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences.

Levy

(1996) Structural Engineering of Microwave Antennas: for Electrical, Mechanical, and Civil Engineering (Antenna Surface Accuracy). New York, USA: IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society, pp. 34–50.

Pappa

Jones

Black

. (2002) Photogrammetry methodology development for gossamer spacecraft structures. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Denver Co, 22–25 April, AIAA 2002-1375, pp. 1–18. Reston, VA: AIAA.

10.

Rochblatt

(1992) A microwave holography methodology for diagnostic and performance improvement for large reflector antennas. NASA TDA Progress Research, NASA-JPL-TDAPR-42-108, USA, 15 February, pp. 235–252. Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech., Pasadena, CA.

11.

Sasaki

Ishimura

Tanaka

(2013) Optimal positioning of actuators and supports for the shape control of shell reflector. In: 55th JSASS/JSME/JAXA structures conference, JSASS-2013-3046, Hokkaido, Japan, 7–9 August, pp. 124–126 (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences.

12.

Tabata

Natori

(1996) Active shape control of a deployable space antenna reflector. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 7: 235–240.

13.

Tanaka

(2011) Surface error estimation and correction of a space antenna based on antenna gain analyses. Acta Astronautica 68(7): 1062–1069.

14.

Tanaka

Sakamoto

Inagaki

. (2014) Development and evaluation of a smart reconfigurable reflector with slits. In: 58th space sciences and technology conference, 3B02, Nagasaki, Japan, 12–14 November, pp. 1–5 (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences.