This study’s relevance lies in the possibility of obtaining a smart sandwich structure with controllable dynamic properties, without compromising the main characteristics of conventional thin viscoelastic sandwiches. The proposed sandwich is composed of a micron-size viscoelastic-magnetorheological layer, which is obtained by adding spherical iron particles to a viscoelastic layer. Thin sandwiches with identical base layers and a viscoelastic core, with and without magnetic particles, are fabricated. Both the viscoelastic sandwich structure and viscoelastic-magnetorheological sandwich structure are experimentally characterised by a forced vibration test with resonance in a bandwidth between 0 and 1 kHz. This work analyses the influence of adding iron particles to obtain a smart thin sandwich. In addition, the vibrational response of the viscoelastic-magnetorheological sandwich structure under an external partial magnetic field, and the controllability of its dynamic properties by means of the magnetic field intensity and position, are studied.
AguibSNourADjedidT. (2016) Forced transverse vibration of composite sandwich beam with magnetorheological elastomer core. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology30(1): 15–24.
2.
AguibSNourAZahloulH. (2014) Dynamic behavior analysis of a magnetorheological elastomer sandwich plate. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences87: 118–136.
3.
ASTM E756-05 (2005) Standard test method for measuring vibration-damping properties of materials.
4.
BabuVRVasudevanR (2016) Dynamic analysis of tapered laminated composite magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) sandwich plates. Smart Materials and Structures25(3): 035006-1–035006-19.
5.
CarlsonJDJollyMR (2000) MR fluid, foam and elastomer devices. Mechatronics10(4–5): 555–569.
6.
ÇeşmeciŞEnginT (2010) Modeling and testing of a field-controllable magnetorheological fluid damper. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences52(8): 1036–1046.
7.
ChoiWJXiongYPShenoiRA (2009) Experimental Study on Vibration Characteristics of Sandwich Beams with Aluminum Skins and Magnetorheological Elastomer Cores. Edinburgh: International Committee on Composite Materials.
8.
ChoiWJXiongYPShenoiRA (2010) Vibration characteristics of sandwich beams with steel skins and magnetorheological elastomer cores. Advances in Structural Engineering13(5): 837–847.
9.
CortesFElejabarrietaMJ (2007) Viscoelastic materials characterisation using the seismic response. Materials & Design28(7): 2054–2062.
10.
EshaghiMSedaghatiRRakhejaS (2015) The effect of magneto-rheological fluid on vibration suppression capability of adaptive sandwich plates: experimental and finite element analysis. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(14): 1920–1935.
11.
EshaghiMSedaghatiRRakhejaS (2016) Dynamic characteristics and control of magnetorheological/electrorheological sandwich structures: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27: 2003–2037.
12.
GoncalvesFDKooJ-HAhmadianM (2006) A review of the state of the art in magnetorheological fluid technologies part I: MR fluid and MR fluid models. Shock and Vibration Digest38(3): 203–219.
13.
HuGGuoMLiW (2012) Analysis of vibration characteristics of magnetorheological elastomer sandwich beam under non-homogeneous magnetic field. Applied Mechanics and Materials101–102: 202–206.
14.
HuGGuoMLiW. (2011) Experimental investigation of the vibration characteristics of a magnetorheological elastomer sandwich beam under non-homogeneous small magnetic fields. Smart Materials and Structures20(12): 127001-1–127001-7.
15.
IrazuLElejabarrietaMJ (2015) The influence of viscoelastic film thickness on the dynamic characteristics of thin sandwich structures. Composite Structures134: 421–428.
16.
KorobkoEVMikhasevGINovikovaZA. (2012) On damping vibrations of three-layered beam containing magnetorheological elastomer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures23(9): 1019–1023.
17.
KozlowskaJBoczkowskaACzulakA. (2016) Novel MRE/CFRP sandwich structures for adaptive vibration control. Smart Materials and Structures25(3): 035025-1–035025-14.
18.
Lara-PrietoVParkinRJacksonM. (2010) Vibration characteristics of MR cantilever sandwich beams: experimental study. Smart Materials and Structures19(1): 015005-1–015005-9.
19.
LiYLiJLiW. (2014) A state-of-the-art review on magnetorheological elastomer devices. Smart Materials and Structures23(12): 123001-1–123001-24.
20.
LongMHuGWangS (2013) Vibration Response Analysis of MRE Cantilever Sandwich Beam under Non-Homogeneous Magnetic Fields. Guilin, China: Trans Tech Publications.
21.
Martinez-AgirreMElejabarrietaMJ (2010) Characterisation and modelling of viscoelastically damped sandwich structures. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences52(9): 1225–1233.
22.
MeghaSKumarNSD’SilvaR (2016) Vibration analysis of magnetorheological elastomer sandwich beam under different magnetic fields. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation6: 75–80.
23.
NashifADJonesDIGHendersonJP (1985) Vibration Damping. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
RajamohanVSedaghatiRRakhejaS (2010) Vibration analysis of a multi-layer beam containing magnetorheological fluid. Smart Materials and Structures19(1): 015013-1–015013-12.
25.
RaoMD (2003) Recent Applications of Viscoelastic Damping for Noise Control in Automobiles and Commercial Airplanes. London: Academic Press.
26.
SodanoHABaeJInmanDJ. (2005) Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam. Journal of Sound and Vibration288(4–5): 1177–1196.
27.
WangJMengG (2001) Magnetorheological fluid devices and their applications in mechanical engineering. Journal of Mechanical Strength23(1): 50–56.
28.
WeiKMengGZhangW. (2008) Experimental investigation on vibration characteristics of sandwich beams with magnetorheological elastomers cores. Journal of Central South University of Technology15(1): 239–242.
29.
ZhouGYWangQ (2006) Study on the adjustable rigidity of magnetorheological-elastomer-based sandwich beams. Smart Materials and Structures15(1): 59–74.
