This article focuses on the design optimization of shape memory alloy compliant mechanisms with functionally graded properties to achieve a user-defined target shape. The functional grading is approximated by allowing the geometry and the modulus of elasticity of each zone to vary. The superelastic phenomenon has been taken into account using a standard nonlinear shape memory alloy material model with linear region of higher modulus of elasticity and a superelastic region with much lower modulus of elasticity. A large deflection beam model is integrated with a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for constrained optimization of the structure’s mechanical properties and geometry. Examples illustrate the trade-offs between the objectives of minimizing shape error, maximum stress, and volume. It is observed that in the optimized designs, the elastic modulus and the geometry work together in regions where large flexibility is required to achieve the target shape.
AhmedSOunaiesZFreckerM (2014) Investigating the performance and properties of dielectric elastomer actuators as a potential means to actuate origami structures. Smart Materials and Structures23(9): 094003.
2.
AlmeidaSRPaulinoGHSilvaEC (2010) Layout and material gradation in topology optimization of functionally graded structures: a global–local approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization42(6): 855–868.
3.
ASTM E8 (2013) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials.
4.
ASTM F2516-07 (2006) Standard test method for tension testing of nickel-titanium superelastic materials.
5.
AuricchioFTaylorRLLublinerJ (1997) Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering146(3–4): 281–312.
6.
BarbarinoSFloresESAjajRMet al. (2014) A review on shape memory alloys with applications to morphing aircraft. Smart Materials and Structures23(6): 063001.
BimberBAHamiltonRFKeistJet al. (2016) Anisotropic microstructure and superelasticity of additive manufactured NiTi alloy bulk builds using laser directed energy deposition. Materials Science and Engineering: A674: 125–134.
9.
BowenLSpringsteenKFeldsteinHet al. (2015.) Development and validation of a dynamic model of magneto-active elastomer actuation of the origami waterbomb base. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics7(1): 011010.
10.
BowenLAGramesCLMaglebySPet al. (2013) A classification of action origami as systems of spherical mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design135(11): 111008.
11.
CarbonariRCSilvaECN (2010) Integral piezoactuator system with optimum placement of functionally graded material-a topology optimization paradigm. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures21: 1653–1668.
12.
CrivaroASheridanRFreckerMet al. (2015) Bistable compliant mechanism using magneto active elastomer actuation. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27(15): 2049–2061.
13.
DebKPratapAAgarwalSet al. (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation6(2): 182–197.
14.
FreckerMIAguileraWM (2003) Analytical modeling of a segmented unimorph actuator using electrostrictive P(VDF-TrFE) copolymer. Smart Materials and Structures13(1): 82–91.
15.
GaynorATMeiselNAWilliamsCBet al. (2014) Multiple-material topology optimization of compliant mechanisms created via polyjet three-dimensional printing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering136(6): 061015.
16.
HamiltonRFPalmerTABimberBA (2015) Spatial characterization of the thermal-induced phase transformation throughout as-deposited additive manufactured NiTi bulk builds. Scripta Materialia101: 56–59.
17.
HaoGLiH (2015) Conceptual designs of multi-degree of freedom compliant parallel manipulators composed of wire-beam based compliant mechanisms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science229(3): 538–555.
18.
HaoGYuJLiH (2016) A brief review on nonlinear modeling methods and applications of compliant mechanisms. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering11(2): 119–128.
19.
HesselbachJRaatzA (2000) Pseudoelastic flexure hinges in robots for microassembly. In: HesselbachJRaatzA (eds) Intelligent Systems and Smart Manufacturing. Bellingham, WI: International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp. 157–167.
20.
JovanovaJFreckerMHamiltonRFet al. (2016) September. Target Shape Optimization of Functionally Graded Shape Memory Alloy Compliant Mechanism. In:Proceedings of ASME 2016 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, Stowe, VT, 28–30 September, p. V002T03A006. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
21.
KleinjanJGDunningAGHerderJL (2014) Design of a compact actuated compliant elbow joint. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics14(08): 1440030.
22.
LiuJHallBFreckerMet al. (2013) Compliant articulation structure using superelastic NiTiNOL. Smart Materials and Structures22(9): 094018.
23.
McGoughKAhmedSFreckerMet al. (2014) Finite element analysis and validation of dielectric elastomer actuators used for active origami. Smart Materials and Structures23(9): 094002.
24.
MalukhinKEhmannKF (2008) An experimental investigation of the feasibility of “self-sensing” shape memory alloy based actuators. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering130(3): 031109.
25.
MalukhinKSungHEhmannK (2012) A shape memory alloy based tool clamping device. Journal of Materials Processing Technology212(4): 735–744.
26.
ManzoJGarciaE (2009) Analysis and optimization of the active rigidity joint. Smart Materials and Structures18(12): 125020.
27.
MurrayAPSchmiedelerJPKorteBM (2008) Kinematic synthesis of planar, shape-changing rigid-body mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design130(3): 032302.
28.
RadmanAHuangXXieYM (2013) Topology optimization of functionally graded cellular materials. Journal of Materials Science48(4): 1503–1510.
29.
RubioWMPaulinoGHSilvaECN (2011) Tailoring vibration mode shapes using topology optimization and functionally graded material concepts. Smart Materials and Structures20(2): 025009.
30.
SaediSTurabiASAndaniMTet al. (2017) Texture, aging, and superelasticity of selective laser melting fabricated Ni-rich NiTi alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A686: 1–10.
31.
SaxenaA (2005) Topology design of large displacement compliant mechanisms with multiple materials and multiple output ports. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization30(6): 477–490.
32.
SheridanRRocheJLoflandSE (2014) Numerical simulation and experimental validation of the large deformation bending and folding behavior of magneto-active elastomer composites. Smart Materials and Structures23(9): 094004.
33.
SoleimaniA (2012) Large deflection of various functionally graded beam using shooting method. In. Applied Mechanics and Materials110–116: 4705–4711.
34.
SunJGuanQLiuYet al. (2016) Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures27(17): 2289–2312.
35.
VatanabeSLPaulinoGHSilvaECN (2013) Design of functionally graded piezocomposites using topology optimization and homogenization–toward effective energy harvesting materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering266: 205–218.
36.
VogtmannDEGuptaSKBergbreiterS (2013) Characterization and modeling of elastomeric joints in miniature compliant mechanisms. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics5(4): 041017.
37.
WalkerJAndaniMTHaberlandCet al. (2014) Additive manufacturing of Nitinol shape memory alloys to overcome challenges in conventional Nitinol fabrication. In: Proceedings of ASME 2014 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–20 November, p. V02AT02A037. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
38.
WangMYChenSWangXet al. (2005) Design of multimaterial compliant mechanisms using level-set methods. Journal of Mechanical Design127(5): 941–956.
39.
WissaACalogeroJWereleyNet al. (2015) Analytical model and stability analysis of the leading edge spar of a passively morphing ornithopter wing. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics10(6): 065003.
40.
XiaQWangMY (2008) Simultaneous optimization of the material properties and the topology of functionally graded structures. Computer-Aided Design40(6): 660–675.
41.
YinLAnanthasureshGK (2001) Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms with multiple materials using a peak function material interpolation scheme. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization23(1): 49–62.
42.
ZhouHTingKL (2009) Geometric modeling and synthesis of spatial multimaterial compliant mechanisms and structures using three-dimensional multilayer wide curves. Journal of Mechanical Design131(1): 011005.
