A new rotary MR damper applicable to a semi-active suspension system featuring a low level between road surface and floor

Abstract

This study presents a rotary magnetorheological (MR) damper for a suspension system of low floor vehicles (LFVs) where a large stroke cannot be achieved due to the space constraints of damper motion for special purposes. As is well known, MR dampers are highly suitable for the semi-active suspension systems, which show controllable damping force by an external magnetic field. One of the crucial geometrical parameters to achieve high damping force at the same magnetic field is the suspension stroke in conventional linear MR dampers developed or proposed so far. However, LFVs which include purpose-built vehicles (PBVs) and future smart mobilities, do not have enough space for the linear MR damper installation. Due to the confined space in LFVs, the shape of the MR damper and the magnetic circuit design need to be carefully devised to achieve the target damping force. In addition, the time delay of the MR damper which affects suspension performance should be considered in the modeling and control processing. In this work, the time delay caused by increased inductance is resolved using the Smith compensator, which is integrated into the control system to mitigate the time delay, ensuring effective real-time control. The target control range and operating angle were decided through mathematical modeling and simulation, followed by the prototype fabrication and the measurement of the field-dependent damping force characteristics of the rotary MR damper. Subsequently, a quarter-car suspension model with the proposed MR damper is established to evaluate the suspension performance of LVFs. It is shown from the control simulation that the ride comfort (ISO 2631) is enhanced by up to 21%, while the velocity response is reduced by up to 52% under smooth (ISO B-Class) and rough (ISO D-Class) road profiles, respectively. The results presented in this work are useful guidelines for future smart mobilities featuring the space confinement between floor and road for damper installation in the development of the semi-active MR suspension system.

Keywords

magnetorheological fluid rotary MR damper (RMRD)low floor vehicles (LFVs)in-wheel motor damping force semi-active suspension control dynamic model time delay compensation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANSI/ASA S2.72-2002 (R2007) / ISO 2631-1:1997 (2002) Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements. Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America.

Bitaraf

Ozbulut

Hurlebaus

, et al. (2010) Application of semi-active control strategies for seismic protection of buildings with MR dampers. Engineering Structures 32(10): 3040–3047.

Büyükköprü

Uzunsoy

Mouton

(2021) Global skyhook and groundhook control of vehicle with semi-active dampers. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Automotive Technologies Congress, (OTEKON 2020), Virtual Congress, 6–7 September 2021.

Carlson

Catanzarite

St. Clair

(1996) Commercial magneto-rheological fluid devices. International Journal of Modern Physics B 10(23n24): 2857–2865.

Cruze

Jebadurai

SVS

, et al. (2018) A review on the magnetorheological fluid, damper and its applications for seismic mitigation. Civil Engineering Journal 4(12): 3058–3074.

Desai

Jamadar

MEH

Kumar

, et al. (2019) Design and experimental characterization of a twin-tube MR damper for a passenger van. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41(8): 332.

Farah

Moreau

Daou

RAZ

(2024) Comparative study of two sky hook strategies analyzed from a control theory perspective. In: IEEE In 2024 28th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), Międzyzdroje, Poland, 27–30 August 2024, pp. 131–136. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

Ferhath

Kasi

(2024a) The evolution of damper technology for enhanced ride comfort and vehicle handling in vehicle suspension system. International Journal of Dynamics and Control 12(11): 3908–3946.

Ferhath

Kasi

(2024b) Orifice and fluid flow modifications for improved damping in vehicle suspensions: A comprehensive review. Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies 12(4): 6777–6808.

10.

Giorgetti

Baldanzini

Biasiotto

, et al. (2010) Design and testing of a MRF rotational damper for vehicle applications. Smart Materials and Structures 19(6): 065006.

11.

Jin

Wang

Sun

, et al. (2021) Design of constrained robust controller for active suspension of in-wheel-drive electric vehicles. Mathematics 9(3): 249.

12.

Kamath

Wereley

Jolly

(1998) Characterization of semi-active magnetorheological helicopter lag mode damper. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Smart Structure and Integrated Systems, San Diego, CA, 15 March 1998, vol. 3329, pp. 356377. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

13.

Kang

Hwang

Choi

(2021) A new design model of an MR shock absorber for aircraft landing gear systems considering major and minor pressure losses: experimental validation. Applied Sciences 11(17): 7895.

14.

Khan

MSA

Suresh

Ramaiah

(2012) Analysis of magnetorheological fluid damper with various piston profiles. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 2(2): 77–83.

15.

Kim

Sohn

Chang

, et al. (2024) Vibration control of car body and wheel motions for in-wheel motor vehicles using road type classification. Actuators 13(2): 80.

16.

Leblebici

Türkay

(2018) An H∞ and skyhook controller design for a high speed railway vehicle. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(9): 156–161.

17.

Lee

Choi

(2019) On the response time of a new permanent magnet based magnetorheological damper: experimental investigation. Smart Materials and Structures 28(1): 014001.

18.

Liu

Zhang

(2017) Ride comfort optimization of in-wheel-motor electric vehicles with in-wheel vibration absorbers. Energies 10(10): 1647.

19.

Liu

Yang

Liao

(2011) A quantizing method for determination of controlled damping parameters of magnetorheological damper models. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 22(18): 2127–2136.

20.

Park

Kang

Choi

(2024) A new rotary magnetorheological damper for a semi-active suspension system of low-floor vehicles. Actuators 13(4): 155.

21.

Ricciardi

Ivanov

Dhaens

, et al. (2019) Ride blending control for electric vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal 10(2): 36.

22.

Rimell

Mansfield

(2007) Design of digital filters for frequency weightings required for risk assessments of workers exposed to vibration. Industrial Health 45(4): 512–519.

23.

Savitski

Ivanov

Augsburg

, et al. (2020) Wheel slip control for the electric vehicle with in-wheel motors: Variable structure and sliding mode methods. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 67(10): 8535–8544.

24.

Seong

Choi

Sung

(2011) Control strategies for vehicle suspension system featuring magnetorheological (MR) damper. In: Beltrán-Carbajal

(ed.) Vibration Analysis and Control: New Trends and Developments. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, pp. 97–114.

25.

Shehata Gad

El-Zoghby

Oraby

, et al. (2019) Application of a preview control with an MR damper model using genetic algorithm in semi-active automobile suspension. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-5006.

26.

Sohn

Choi

(2015) Design and novel type of a magnetorheological damper featuring piston bypass hole. Smart Materials and Structures 24(3): 035013.

27.

Sohn

Kim

Seong

, et al. (2023) Magnetorheological damper. US Patent Application No. 18/529,265, filed 5 December 2023.

28.

Spencer

Dyke

Sain

, et al. (1997) Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 123(3): 230–238.

29.

Spencer

Jr Yang

Carlson

, et al. (1998) Smart dampers for seismic protection of structures: A full-scale study. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on structural control 1. pp.417–426. Kyoto.

30.

Technical Committee ISO/TC (1995) Mechanical Vibration–Road Surface Profiles–Reporting of Measured Data. International Organization for Standardization.

31.

Tsang

RKL

Chandler

(2006) Simplified inverse dynamics models for MR fluid dampers. Engineering Structures 28(3): 327–341.

32.

Tseng

Hrovat

(2015) State of the art survey: active and semi-active suspension control. Vehicle System Dynamics 53(7): 1034–1062.

33.

Velagic

(2008) Design of Smith-like predictive controller with communication delay adaptation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 47: 199–203.

34.

Liu

Luo

, et al. (2024) Model-based design of an active suspension for the improvement of in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle. IEEE Access 12: 45597–45615.

35.

Yao

Yap

Chen

, et al. (2002) MR damper and its application for semi-active control of vehicle suspension system. Mechatronics 12(7): 963–973.

36.

Song

(1999) A new adaptive sky-hook control of vehicle semi-active suspensions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering 213(3): 293–303.

37.

Yun

Lee

Park

(2010) A study on the efficiency improvement of a passive oil damper using an MR accumulator. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 24: 2297–2305.

38.

Yusoffa

MFM

Zaidia

AMA

Ishaka

SAF

, et al. (2021) Simulation studies of vibration isolation using electromagnetic damper. Jurnal Kejuruteraan UKM 4(2): 119–126.

39.

Zhang

Chen

(2024) Robust predictive compensation control for lateral magnetorheological semi-active suspension of high-speed trains with time delay. Automatika 65(1): 14–33.

40.

Zhao

Schindler

(2014) Evaluation of whole-body vibration exposure experienced by operators of a compact wheel loader according to ISO 2631-1: 1997 And ISO 2631-5: 2004. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 44(6): 840–850.