This study integrated the research streams of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and group conflict by comparing the expression of different types of conflict in CMC groups and face-to-face (FTF) groups over time. The main aim of the study was to compare the cues-filtered-out approach against the social information processing theory. A laboratory study was conducted with 39 groups (19 CMC and 20 FTF) in which members were required to work together over three sessions. The frequencies of task, process, and relationship conflict were analyzed. Findings supported the social information processing theory. There was more process and relationship conflict in CMC groups compared to FTF groups on Day 1. However, this difference disappeared on Days 2 and 3. There was no difference between CMC and FTF groups in the amount of task conflict expressed on any day.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2.
Bhappu, A. D. , Meader, D. K., Erwin, C. R., & Crews, J. M. (2000, August). For better or worse? Demographic diversity and computer-mediated communication in decision-making teams. Paper presented at the 60th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
3.
Bordia, P. (1997). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 99-120.
4.
Chang, A. , Bordia, P., & Duck, J. (in press). Developmental patterns of project teams: An empirical attempt at reconciling the differences between linear progression and punctuated equilibrium models of group development. Academy of Management Journal.
5.
Chang, A. , Irmer, B., Bordia, P., & Hobman, E. (2001). A multi-dimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
6.
Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-165.
7.
Chidambaram, L. , Bostrom, R. P., & Wynne, B. E. (1991). A longitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 7-25.
8.
Culnan, M. J. , & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
10.
Eisenhardt, K. , & Bourgeois, L. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737-770.
11.
Futoran, G. C. , Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(3), 211-232.
12.
Hiltz, S. R. , Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
13.
Hiltz, S. R. , Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, de-individuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232.
14.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
15.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-557.
16.
Jehn, K. A. , Chadwick, C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(4), 287-305.
17.
Jehn, K. A. , Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
18.
Kiesler, S. , Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
19.
Lea, M. , O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). Flaming in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
20.
Lea, M. , & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
21.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
23.
Miranda, S. M. , & Bostrom, R. P. (1994). The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(3), 63-96.
24.
Okhuysen, G. A. (2000, August). The interplay of conflict and outcome: An examination of temporal effects in ongoing groups. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Toronto, Canada.
25.
Okhuysen, G. A. , & Jehn, K. A. (2000, August). The interplay of conflict types, group process, and group task: An examination of the temporal effects of intra-group conflict. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Toronto, Canada.
26.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
27.
Poole, M. S. , & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In C. Steinfeld & J. Fulk (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Poole, M. S. , Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926-953.
29.
Putnam, L. L. , & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 549-599). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Ross, R. (1989). Conflict. In R. Ross & J. Ross (Eds.), Small groups in organizational settings (pp. 139-178). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
Sambamurthy, V. (1989). Supporting group performance during stakeholder analysis: The effects of alternative computer-based designs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St. Paul.
32.
Short, J. , Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
33.
Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
34.
Sproull, L. , & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
35.
Straus, S. G. (1997). Technology, group processes, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
36.
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
37.
Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
38.
Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
39.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
40.
Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
41.
Walther, J. B. , Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
42.
Walther, J. B. , & Burgoon, J. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
43.
Wheelan, S. A. (1990). Facilitating training groups. New York: Praeger.
