This study investigates the effects of e-groups on well-being and performance, using a collective approach and an objective performance indicator. Furthermore, it includes collective efficacy as a moderator and negative (anxiety) as well as positive (engagement) well-being. A lab experiment with an interval of 3 weeks was performed among 140 students who were randomly distributed across 18 groups using a chat-internet program and 10 groups working face to face. Half the groups performed under time pressure. Results confirm the moderating role of perceived collective efficacy on well-being and task performance. All groups working under time pressure and low in collective efficacy show an increase in collective anxiety. Chat-internet groups under time pressure show an increase in collective engagement but only when they feel high in collective efficacy. Finally, task performance was poorer in chat groups, working under time pressure, and with low levels of collective efficacy than in the other groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
2.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford.
4.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
5.
Beehr, T. A. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. London: Routledge.
6.
Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 239-253.
7.
Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.
8.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. S. (1985). Stress social support, and the buffering hypohesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
9.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
10.
Davis, J. H. (1969). Individual-group problem solving, subject preference, and problem type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 362-374.
11.
Eden, D., & Zuk, Y. (1995). Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 628-635.
12.
Garst, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stress or strain relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal study in East Germany. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 417-438.
13.
Gibson, C. B. (1995). Determinants and consequences of group-efficacy beliefs in work organizations in U.S., Honk Kong, and Indonesia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
14.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
15.
Gore, S. (1987). Perspectives on social support and research on stress moderating processes. In J. M. Ivancevich & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Job stress: From theory to suggestion (pp. 85-101). New York: Haworth.
16.
Gracia, F. J., Arcos, J. L., & Caballer, A. (2000). Influencia de la presión temporal en el trabajo en grupo en función del tipo de tarea y del canal de comunicación [Influence of time pressure on group performance in function of type of task and communication channel]. Psicothema, 12(2), 241-246.
17.
Heaton, A. W., & Krublanski, A. W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extroverts under time pressure: Effects of need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.
18.
Hodges, L., & Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 48-59.
19.
Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 3, 307-333.
20.
Igbaria, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards computer use. Behavior & Information Technology, 9(3), 229-241.
21.
Isenberg, D. J. (1981). Some effects of time pressure on vertical structure and decision making accuracy in small groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 119-134.
22.
Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361.
23.
Jones, P. E., & Wall, R. E. (1990). Components of computer anxiety. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 18(3), 161-168.
24.
Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Pschology, 28, 542-571.
25.
Kay, R. H. (1990). Predicting student teacher commitment to the use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6(3), 299-309.
26.
Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1993). Entrainment of creativity in small groups. Small Groups Research, 24, 179-198.
27.
Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
28.
Korunka, C., & Vitouch, O. (1999). Effects of the implementation of information technology on employee’s strain and job satisfaction: A context-dependent approach. Work & Stress, 34, 341-363.
29.
Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
30.
Leithwood, K., Menzies, T., Jantzi, D., & Leithwood, J. (1996). School restructuring, transformational leadership and the amelioration of teacher burnout. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9, 199-215.
31.
Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.
32.
Leso, R., & Peck, K. L. (1992). Computer anxiety and different types of computer courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8(4), 469-478.
33.
Little, B. L., & Madigan, R. M. (1994, August). Motivation in work teams: A test of the construct of collective efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Houston, TX.
34.
Maibach, E., & Murphy, D. A. (1995). Self-efficacy in health promotion research and practice: Conceptualization and measurement. Health Education Research, 10(1), 37-50.
35.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
36.
McCann, C., Baranski, J. V., Thompson, M. M., & Pigeau, R. A. (2000). On the utility of experiential cross-training for team decision-making under time stress. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1095-1110.
37.
McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 78-96). New York: Macmillan.
38.
Nunnaly, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187-199.
40.
Rabinowitz, S., Kushnir, T., & Ribak, J. (1996). Preventing burnout: Increasing professional self-efficacy in primary care nurses in a Balint group. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 44, 28-32.
41.
Salanova, M., Cifre, E., & Martin, P. (1999). El proceso de tecnoestrés y su prevención [The process of technostress and its prevention]. Revista de Salud, Trabajo y Prevención, 1, 18-28.
42.
Salanova, M., Grau, R.,Cifre, E., & Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of use and burnout: The moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16(2), 575-590.
43.
Salanova, M., Peiró, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demand-control model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 1-25.
44.
Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2000). Exposure to information technologies and its relation to burnout. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(5), 385-392.
45.
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhood and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
46.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Xie, J. L. (2000). Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 512-525.
47.
Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
48.
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is perceived self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
49.
Schwarzer, R. (1999). General perceived self-efficacy in 14 cultures. Self-Efficacy assessment. Retrieved from http:/www.yorku.ca/faculty/academic/schwarze/world14.htm
50.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
51.
Sethi, R. (2000). New product quality and product development teams. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 1-14.
52.
Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56, 216-217.
53.
Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making. New York: Plenum.
54.
Symon, G. (2000). Information and communication technologies and the network organization: A critical analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 389-414.
55.
Todman, J., & Monaghan, E. (1994). Qualitative differences in computer experience, computer anxiety and students’ use of computers: A path model. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 529-539.
56.
Van Yperen, N. W. (1998). Informational support, equity and burnout: The moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 29-33.
57.
Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193-210.
58.
Yukl, G. A., Malone, M. P., Hayslip, B., & Pamin, T. A. (1976). The effects of time pressure and issue settlement order on integrative bargaining. Sociometry, 39, 277-281.
