Research suggests that gender role, rather than sex, is associated with the perception of individuals as leaders. This study tests the effect of gender role and intelligence on leadership emergence by using a pattern approach and manipulating task type. Two hundred female undergraduate participants, categorized by their pattern of masculinity, femininity, and intelligence, were placed in groups of 4 members. Groups were randomly assigned to an initiating-structure or consensus-building task condition. In the initiating-structure task condition, both masculine-intelligent and androgynous-intelligent individuals emerged more than feminine-intelligent or mixed-pattern individuals. In the consensus-building task condition, feminine-intelligent individuals did not emerge as leaders more than masculine-intelligent or mixed-pattern individuals. However, partial support was found for the emergence of androgynous-intelligent individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, C.R., & Schneier, C.E. (1978). Locus of control, leader behavior, and leader performance among management students. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 690-698.
2.
Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
3.
Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and leadership. New York: Free Press.
4.
Baumgardner, T.L., Lord, R.G., & Maher, K.J. (1991) Perceptions of women in management. In R.G. Lord & K.J. Maher (Eds.), Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance (pp. 95-113). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
5.
Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
6.
Bem, S.L. (1975). Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643.
7.
Bem, S.L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48-54.
8.
Berdahl, J.L. (1996). Gender and leadership in work groups: Six alternative models. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 20-40.
9.
Carbonell, J.L. (1984). Sex roles and leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 44-49.
10.
Carli, L.L., & Eagly, A.H. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In G.N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Deal, J.J., & Stevenson, M.A. (1998). Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s: Plus ça changé . . . Sex Roles, 38, 287-300.
14.
Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
15.
Dodrill, C.B. (1981). An economical method for the evaluation of general intelligence in adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 668-673.
16.
Dodrill, C.B. (1983). Long-term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 316-317.
17.
Dodrill, C.B., & Warner, M.H. (1988). Further studies of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief measure of intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 145-147.
18.
Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Eagly, A.H., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 233-256.
20.
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
21.
Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
22.
Fleischer, R.A., & Chertkoff, J.M. (1986). Effects of dominance and sex on leader selection in dyadic work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 94-99.
23.
Gibbs, J.I. (1982). Personality patterns of delinquent females: Ethnic and sociocultural variations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 198-206.
24.
Goeke, K.R., Tosi, D.J., & Eshbaugh, D.M. (1993). Personality patterns of male felons in a correctional halfway house setting: An MMPI typology analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 413-422.
25.
Goktepe, J.R., & Schneier, C.E. (1989). Role of sex, gender roles, and attraction in predicting emergent leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 165-167.
26.
Hall, R.J., Workman, J.W., & Marchioro, C.A. (1998). Sex, task, and behavioral flexibility effects on leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 1-32.
27.
Hawkins, K.W. (1995). Effects of gender and communication content on leadership emergence in small task-oriented groups. Small Group Research, 26, 234-249.
28.
Hegstrom, J.L., & Griffith, W.I. (1992). Dominance, sex, and leader emergence. Sex Roles, 27, 209-220.
29.
Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J., Simon, M.C., & Martell, R.F. (1989). Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 935-942.
30.
Hoffman, R.M., & Borders, D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39-55.
31.
House, A., Dallinger, J.M., & Kilgallen, D. (1998). Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style. Communication Reports, 11, 11-20.
32.
Huston-Comeaux, S.L., & Kelly, J.R. (1996). Sex differences in interaction style and group task performance: The process-performance relationship. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 255-275.
33.
Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J.P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620-631.
34.
Kawakami, C., White, J.B., & Langer, E.J. (2000). Mindful and masculine: Freeing women leaders from the constraints of gender roles. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 49-63.
35.
Kent, R.L., & Moss, S.E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335-1346.
36.
Kolb, J.A. (1997). Are we still stereotyping leadership? A look at gender and other predictors of leader emergence. Small Group Research, 28, 370-393.
37.
Konrad, A.M., & Ritchie, E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.
38.
Levene, H. (1960). Test of homogeneity of variances. In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
Lord, R.G., Brown, D.J., & Harvey, J.L. (2001). System constraints on leadership perceptions, behavior, and influence: An example of connectionist level process. In M.A. Hogg & R.S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 3: Group processes. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
40.
Lord, R.G., De Vader, C.L., & Alliger, G.M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
41.
Lord, R.G., & Emrich, C.G. (2001). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551-579.
42.
Lord, R.G., Foti, R.J., & De Vader, C.L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
43.
Lord, R.G., & Maher, K.J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
44.
Lord, R.G., & Smith, W.G. (1998). Leadership and the changing nature of work performance. In D.R. Ilgen & E.D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel decisions, and development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Luthar, H.K. (1996). Gender differences in evaluation of performance and leadership ability: Autocratic vs. democratic managers. Sex Roles, 35, 337-361.
46.
Magnusson, D. (1995). Individual development: A holistic, integrated model. In P. Moen, G.L. Elder, Jr., & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context (pp. 19-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
McClelland, D.C., & Boyatzis, R.E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long-term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 737-743.
Megargee, E.I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377-382.
50.
Moss, S.E., & Kent, R.L. (1996). Gender and gender-role categorization of emergent leaders: A critical review and comprehensive analysis. Sex Roles, 35, 79-96.
51.
Motowidlo, S.J. (1981). A scoring procedure for sex-role orientation based on profile similarity indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 735-745.
52.
Powell, G.N., & Butterfield, D.A., (1979). Sex, attributions, and leadership: A brief review. Psychological Reports, 51, 1171-1174.
53.
Ridgeway, C.L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.
54.
Ross, S.M., & Offermann, L.R. (1997). Transformational leaders: Measurement of personality attributes and work group performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1078-1086.
55.
Schneier, C.E., & Bartol, K.M. (1980). Sex effects in emergent leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 341-345.
56.
Smith, J.A., & Foti, R.J. (1998). A pattern approach to the study of leadership emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 147-160.
57.
Sorrentino, R.M., & Field, N. (1986). Emergent leadership over time: The functional value of positive motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1091-1099.
58.
Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
59.
Tango, R.A., & Uziuban, C.U. (1984). The use of personality components in the interpretation of career indecision. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 509-512.
60.
Wentworth, D.K., & Anderson, L.R. (1984). Emergent leadership as a function of sex and task type. Sex Roles, 11, 513-524.
Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
63.
Zaccaro, S.J., Gilbert, J.A., Thor, K.K., & Mumford, M.D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perceptiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Quarterly, 2, 317-342.
