This article reviews literature that takes a temporal perspective on groups, focusing particularly on the theories that guide such work. The temporal perspective is a process-focused view that treats groups as systems in which change occurs across multiple time scales. The review is organized around six themes that have been especially generative: (a) Time is socially constructed; (b) time is a resource; (c) time is a fundamental issue for theory and research; (d) groups change systematically over time; (e) group processes have temporal patterns; and (f) groups are complex systems characterized by nonlinear dynamics. The article closes by identifying the need for continued theory development and testing to better integrate the disparate theories and findings found in literature inspired by the temporal perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 251-284.
2.
Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512-529.
3.
Argote, L. (1993). Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 31-51.
4.
Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75-85.
5.
Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 17, (pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales,& E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action (pp. 111-162). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
9.
Bales, R. F. (1955). Adaptive and integrative change sas sources of strain in social systems. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction(pp. 127-131). New York: Knopf.
10.
Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
11.
Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461-468.
12.
Bennis, W., & Shepard, H. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-437.
13.
Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
14.
Bettenhausen, K. L., & Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350-372.
15.
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Carley, K. M. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331-354.
18.
Contractor, H., & Seibold, D. R. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19, 528-563.
19.
Davis, J. A. (1967). Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations, 20, 181-187.
20.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
21.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 19, 107-116.
23.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82-115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, & Co.
24.
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611-629.
25.
Fisek, M. H.,& Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33, 327-335.
26.
Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. (2000). Working through conflict (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
27.
Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
28.
Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 6597.
29.
Glasl, F. (1982). The process of conflict escalation and roles of third parties. In G. B. J. Bomers & R. Peterson (Eds.), Conflict management and industrial relations (pp. 119-140). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
30.
Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. H. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
33.
Harper, N. L., & Askling, L. R. (1980). Group communication and quality of task solution in a media production organization. Communication Monographs, 47, 77-100.
34.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
35.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Hill, W. F., & Gruner, L. (1973). A study of development in open and closed groups. Small Group Behavior, 4, 355-382.
38.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: A task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204.
39.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
40.
Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. L. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.
42.
Kelly, J. R. (1984). Time limit and task type effects on individual and group performance and interaction. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.
43.
Kelly, J. R., Jackson, J. W., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. L. (1997). The effect of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in problem-solving groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 10-22.
44.
Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
45.
Keogh, C. M., & Lake, R. (1993). Values as structuring properties in contract negotiations. In C. Conrad (Ed.), The ethical nexus (pp. 171-191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46.
Latané, B. (1996). Dynamic social impact: The creation of culture by communication. Journal of Communication, 46, 13-25.
47.
Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
48.
Lundgren, D., & Knight, D. (1978). Sequential stages of development in sensitivity training groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 204-222.
49.
Mann, R., Gibbard, G., & Hartman, J. (1967). Interpersonal style and group development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
50.
McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher & R. E. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
52.
McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.
53.
McGrath, J. E., & O’Connor, K. M. (1996). Temporal issues in work groups. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 25-52). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (in press). Dynamics in groups and teams: Groups as complex action systems. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick, & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
58.
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
59.
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2000). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
61.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 367-376.
62.
Nutt, P. C. (1984). Types of organizational decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 414-450.
63.
Opp, K.-D. (1982). The evolutionary emergence of norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 139-149.
64.
Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine: A metaanalysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32, 313-341.
65.
Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A test of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
66.
Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 175-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67.
Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (in press). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), Handbook for information systems research. Hershey, PA: Idea Press.
68.
Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
69.
Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1996). The structuration of group decisions. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making(2nd ed., pp. 114-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 147-179). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1984). Dominance, performance, and status in groups: A theoretical analysis. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 1, pp. 59-93). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
73.
Roy, D. F. (1960). “Banana time”: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18, 158-168.
74.
Sell, J., Lovaglia, M. J., Mannix, E. A., Samuelson, C. D., & Wilson, R. K. (2004). Investigating conflict, power, and status within and among groups. Small Group Research, 35(1), 44-72.
75.
Sheppard, B. H. (1984). Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 41-190). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
76.
Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77.
Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
78.
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
79.
Tschan, F. (2002). Ideal cycles of communication (or cognitions) in triads, dyads, and individuals. Small Group Research, 33(6), 615-643.
80.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
81.
Tuckman, J., & Lorge, I. (1962). Individual ability as a determinant of group superiority. Human Relations, 15, 45-51.
82.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
83.
Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 7, (pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
84.
von Cranach, M. (1996). Toward a theory of the acting group. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 147-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85.
Waller, M. J. (2000). All in the timing: Team pacing behaviors in dynamic conditions. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior: Time in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 37-43). Brisbane, Australia: Wiley.
86.
Waller, M. J, Conte, J. M, Gibson, C. B., & Carpenter, M. A. (2001). The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, 26, 586-600.
87.
Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 682-693.
88.
Wheelan, S. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
89.
Wheelan, S., Murphy, D., Tsumura, E., & Kline, S. F. (1998). Memberperceptions of internal group dynamics and productivity. Small Group Research, 29, 371-393.
90.
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
91.
Worchel, S. (1994). You can go home again: Returning group research to the group context with an eye on developmental issues. Small Group Research, 25, 205-223.
92.
Zaheer, S., Albert, S., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), 725-741.
