There is conclusive evidence that information search processes are typically biased in favor of the information seeker's own opinion (confirmation bias). Less is known about how knowledge about others' opinions affects this confirmatory information search. In the present study, the authors manipulated feedback about others' opinions and anticipation of group interaction. As predicted, the effect of knowledge about others' opinions on confirmatory information search depended on whether participants anticipated interacting with these others. Specifically, minority members anticipating a group discussion exhibited a particularly strong confirmation bias, whereas minority members who did not anticipate a discussion predominantly sought information opposing their opinion. For participants not anticipating group interaction, confidence about the correctness of one's decision mediated the impact of knowledge about others' opinions on confirmatory information search. Results are discussed with regard to the debiasing effect of preference heterogeneity on confirmatory information search in groups.
Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chen, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M. Gollwitzer & A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553-578). New York: Guilford .
2.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
3.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469-492.
5.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41-80.
6.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 65, 959-974.
7.
Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799-825.
8.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone elses place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 977-990.
9.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on "selective exposure to information". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571.
10.
Kerschreiter, R., Schulz-Hardt, S., Mojzisch, A., & Frey, D. (in press). Biased information search in homogeneous groups: Confidence in the group decision as a moderator for the effect of anticipated task requirements . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
11.
Levine, J.M., & Russo, E. (1995). Impact of anticipated interaction on information acquisition. Social Cognition, 13, 293-317.
12.
Lundgren, S.R., & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 715-726.
13.
Moscovici, S. (1994). Three concepts: Minority, conflict and behavioral style. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 233-251). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
14.
Nemeth, C.J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
15.
Nemeth, C.J., & Rogers, J. (1996). Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 67-76.
16.
Pinkley, R.L., Griffith, T.L., & Northcraft, G.B. (1995). "Fixed pie" a la mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 62, 101-112.
17.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
18.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655-669.
19.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 88, 563-586.
20.
Sniezek, J.A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155.
21.
Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Tetlock, P.E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
23.
Tjosvold, D., Johnson, D.W., & Lerner, J. (1981). The effects of affirmation and acceptance on incorporation of an opposing opinion in problem-solving. Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 103-110.
24.
Van Hiel, A., & Franssen, V. (2003). Information acquisition bias during the preparation of group discussion: A comparison of prospective minority and majority members . Small Group Research, 34, 557-574.
25.
Wittenbaum, G.M., Merry, C.J., & Stasser, G. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 32, 129-152.
26.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin , 115, 323-345.
