An experiment was conducted to examine how communication patterns and task performance differ as a function of the group's communication environment and how these processes change over time. In a longitudinal design, three-person groups had to select and argue the correct answer out of a set of three alternatives for ten questions. Compared with face-to-face groups, video-teleconferencing groups took fewer turns, required more time for turns, and interrupted each other less. Listeners appeared to be more polite, waiting for a speaker to finish before making their conversational contribution. Although groups were able to maintain comparable performance scores across communication conditions, initial differences between conditions in communication patterns disappeared over time, indicating that the video-teleconferencing groups adapted to the newness and limitations of their communication environment. Moreover, because of increased experience with the task and the group, groups in both conditions needed less conversation to complete the task at later rounds. Implications are discussed for practice, training, and possibilities for future research.
Adelman, L., Miller, S.L., Henderson, D., & Schoelles, M. (2003). Using Brunswikian theory and a longitudinal design to study how hierarchical teams adapt to increasing levels of time pressure . Acta Psychologica, 112, 181-206.
2.
Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75-85.
3.
Arrow, H., Poole, M.S., Henry, K.B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73-105.
4.
Baltes, B.B., Dickson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., Bauer, C.C., & LaGanke, J.S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
5.
Blickensderfer, E.L., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Salas, E. (1998). Cross-training and team performance. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 299-311). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Bolstad, C.A., & Endsley, M.R. (1999). Shared mental models and shared displays: An empirical evaluation of team performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 213-217). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society .
7.
Boyle, E.A., Anderson, A.H., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue and performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language and Speech , 37, 1-20.
8.
Briggs, G.E., & Johnston, W.A. (1967). Team training (Tech. Rep. No. 1327-4). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Device Center.
9.
Cascio, W.F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. The Academy of Management Executive, 14, 81-90.
10.
Clark, H.H., & Brennan, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine , & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
11.
Clark. H. H., & Carlson, T. (1982). Hearers and speech acts . Language, 58, 332-373.
12.
Connaughton, S.L., & Daly, J.A. (2004). Leading from afar: Strategies for effectively leading virtual teams. In S. H. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies and practice (pp. 49-75). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
13.
Dennis, A.R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27, 532-550.
14.
Dietz-Uhler, B., & Bishop-Clark, C. (2001). The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 269-283.
15.
Doherty-Sneddon, G.D., O'Malley, C., Garrod, S., Anderson, A., Langton, S., & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video-mediated communication: A comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105-125.
16.
Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., & Henderson, A. (1996). Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5, 33-62.
17.
Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 297-323.
18.
Entin, E.E., & Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41, 312-325.
19.
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, J. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8, 8-34.
20.
Friedman, R.A., & Currall, S.C. (2003). Conflict escalation: Dispute exacerbating elements of e-mail communication. Human Relations, 56, 1325-1348.
21.
Fussell, S.R., & Benimoff, I. (1995). Social and cognitive processes in interpersonal communication: Implications for advanced telecommunications technologies. Human Factors, 37, 228-250.
22.
Gibson, C.B., & Cohen, S.G. (2004). Virtual team effectiveness. General Management Review. Retrieved February 20, 2006, from http://www.etgmr.com/GMRjan-mar04/art1.html
23.
Hancock, J.T., & Dunham, P.J. (2001). Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes, 31, 91-110.
24.
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95.
25.
Hollingshead, A.B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
26.
Hollingshead, A.B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 1080-1089.
27.
Hollingshead, A.B., McGrath, J.E., & O'Connor, K.M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
28.
Horvath, L., & Tobin, T.J. (2001). Twenty-first century teamwork: Defining competencies for virtual teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Virtual teams (Vol. 8, pp. 239-258). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
29.
Jackson, P., & Klobas, J. (2008). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems, 44, 409-424.
30.
Kanki, B.G., Folk, V.G., & Irwin, C.M. (1991). Communication variations and aircrew performance . International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 149-162.
31.
Kelly, J.R., Jackson, J.W., & Hutson-Comeaux, S.L. (1997). The effects of time pressure and task differences on influences modes and accuracy in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 10-22.
32.
Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J.N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57-80). Cambridge : MIT Press .
33.
Knoll, K., & Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1998). Working together in global virtual teams. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 2-23). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
34.
Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1998). Developing adaptive teams. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 115-153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., Brennan, S.E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp.137-162). Cambridge : MIT Press.
36.
LePine, J.A. (2005). Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology , 90, 1153-1167.
McGrath, J.E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
39.
McGrath, J.E. (1993). Introduction. The JEMCO workshop: Description of a longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 24, 285-306.
40.
McGrath, J.E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D.H., Hollingshead, A.B., & O'Connor, K.M. (1993). Groups, tasks and technology: The effects of experience and change [Special issue]. Small Group Research, 24, 406-420.
41.
McIntyre, R.M., & Dickinson, T.L. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T. Brannick , E. Salas., & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 19-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
McIntyre, R.M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles for complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision-making in organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Moreland, R.L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Mühlbach, L., Böcker, M., & Prussog, A. (1995). Telepresence in video communications: A study on stereoscopy and individual eye contact. Human Factors, 37, 290-305.
45.
Nardi, B.A., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83-112). Cambridge: MIT Press.
46.
O'Conaill, B., & Whittaker, S. (1997). Characterizing, predicting, and measuring video-mediated communication: A conversational approach. In K. Finn, A. Sellen, & S. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 107-131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 175-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Qureshi, S., & Vogel, D. (2001). Adaptiveness in virtual teams: Organizational challenges and research directions. Group Decision and Negotiation , 10, 27-46.
50.
Rasker, P.C. (2002). Communication and performance in teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
51.
Rochlin, G.I., LaPorte, T.R., & Roberts, K.H. (1987). The self-designing high reliability organization: Aircraft carrier flight operators at sea. Naval War College Review, Autumn, 76-90. Retrieved January 12, 2006, from http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/1998/summer/art7su98.htm
52.
Salas, E., Burke, C.S., & Samman, S.N. (2001). Understanding command and control teams operating in complex environments. Information Knowledge Systems Management , 2, 311-323.
53.
Seetharaman, P.S., Samarah, I., & Mykytyn, P.P. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information and Management, 41, 303-321.
54.
Seifert, C.M., & Hutchins, E.L. (1992). Error as opportunity: Learning in a cooperative task. Human-Computer Interaction , 7, 409-435.
55.
Sellen, A.J. (1995). Remote conversations: The effects of mediating talk with technology. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 401-444.
56.
Serfaty, D., Entin E. E., & Johnston, J.H. (1998). Team coordination training . In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 221-270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
57.
Serfaty, D., Entin, E.E., & Volpe, C. (1993). Adaptation to stress in team decision-making and coordination. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1228-1232). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
58.
Shin, Y. (2005). Conflict resolution in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 331-345.
59.
Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Johnston, J.A., & Payne, S.C. (1998). Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments . In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 61-88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
61.
Straus, S.G. (1997). Technology, group process, and group outcomes: Testing the connections in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 227-266.
62.
Straus, S.G., & McGrath, J.E. (1994). Does the medium matter: The interaction of task and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
63.
Tandberg. (2007, January 22). Face to face with management reality: A telework research report. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://www.teleworkexchange.com/managementstudy/Face-to-Face-with-Management-Reality-Study-012207.pdf
64.
Thompson, L.F., & Coovert, M.D. (2006). Understanding and developing virtual computer-supported cooperative work teams. In C. Bowers, E. Salas, & F. Jentsch (Eds.), Creating high-tech teams: Practical guidance on work performance and technology (pp. 213-242). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
65.
Van der Kleij, R. (2007). Overcoming distance in virtual teams: Effects of communication media, experience, and time pressure on distributed teamwork . Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved March 3, 2009, from http://dare.uva.nl/record/234997
66.
Van der Kleij, R., Paashuis, R.M., Langefeld, J.J., & Schraagen, J.M.C. (2004). Effects of long-term use of video-communication technologies on the conversational process. International Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work, 6, 57-59.
67.
Van der Kleij, R., Paashuis, R.M., & Schraagen, J.M.C. (2005). On the passage of time: Temporal differences in video-mediated and face-to-face interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 521-542.
68.
Walther, J.B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated communication: Past, present, and future. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 235-258). Cambridge: MIT Press.
69.
Wegner, D.M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
70.
Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
71.
Wilson, J.M., Straus, S.G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 16-33.
72.
Zheng, J., Bos, N., Olson, J.S., & Olson, G.M. (2001). Trust without touch: Jumpstart trust with social chat. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computer Systems (pp. 293-294). New York: ACM Press.
73.
Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N., Olson, J.S., & Olson, G.M. (2002). Trust without touch: Jumpstart long-distance trust with initial social activities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computer Systems (pp. 141-146). New York: ACM Press.
