Dyadic interaction is modelled as an adaptive process between personality of the partners involved and the characteristics of the theme. The theme structure and the principles which control the adaptation process are referred to as “syntality”. The material of the studies reported are the speech signals of the verbal interaction reduced to an on-off pattern. In a first study individual speech behavior was found to remain stable in dyads even if partners changed. The second study showed the stability of the speech patterns for different interaction themes even if dyads changed. These apparently contradictory results are reconciled by introducing the concept of “adaptive stability”. Individual speech behavior does not happen at a stable activity level, but is characterized by a constant relationship (“less” or “more”) to the respective activity of the other partner.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyleM.FurnhamA.GrahamJ. A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, Ca.: Stanford University Press.
3.
BradyP. T. (1965). A technique for investigating on-off patterns of speech. Bell System Technical Journal, 44, 1–22.
4.
CappellaJ. N. (1985). Controlling the floor in conversation. In SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS. (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 69–103.
5.
CassottaL.FeldsteinS.JaffeJ. (1964). AVTA: A device for automatic vocal transaction analysis. Journal of Experimental Analysis and Behavior, 7, 99–104.
6.
CassottaL.FeldsteinS.JaffeJ. (1967). The stability and modificability of individual vocal characteristics in stress and nonstress interviews. Research Bulletin No. 2. New York: William Alanson White Institute.
7.
CattellR. B. (1948). Concept and measurement of group syntality. Psychological Review, 55.
8.
ChappieE. D. (1939). Quantitative analysis of the interaction of individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy, 25, 58–67.
9.
CrownC. L.FeldsteinS. (1981). Conversational congruence: Measurement and meaning. Paper read at the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore.
10.
DabbsJ. M.RubackR. B.EvansM. S. (1987). “Grouptalk”: Sound and silence in group conversation. In SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS. (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 501–520.
11.
DavisM., (Ed.) (1982). Interaction Rhythms. New York: Human Sciences Press.
von EhrenfelsC. (1890). Über Gestaltqualitäten. Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 14, pp. 249–292.
14.
Eibl-EibesfeldI. (1984). Die Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens. München: Piper.
15.
GilesH.TaylorD.BourhisR. Y. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accomodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2, 177–192.
16.
HallJ. A. (1985). Male and female nonverbal behavior. In SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS. (Eds.). Multichannel integrations ofnonverbal behavior. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 195–225.
17.
JaffeJ.FeldsteinS. (1970). Rhythms of dialogue. New York: Academic Press.
18.
KrügerH.-P. (1985). Was ist Sprechen? Objektive Registrierung des Sprechverhaltens im Alltag mit dem LOGOPORT. In CzogalikD.EhlersW.TeufelR. (Eds.), Perspektiven der Psychotherapieforschung. Freiburg: Hochschulverlag, pp. 349–361.
19.
KrügerH.-P. (1986). Nonverbal characteristics of verbal behavior. A biological approach to personality and syntality. Proceedings of the Conference on Current Trends in Nonverbal Communication, Jonesboro, Arkansas.
20.
KrügerH.-P. (1987). The LOGOPORT — a new measurement device for the study of verbal behavior in the open field. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Arlington, Virginia.
21.
KrügerH.-P. (1988). Speech chronemics — a hidden dimension of speech. Theoretical background, measurement, and clinical validity. Pharmacopsychiatry, (in press).
22.
LewinK. (1951/1963). Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Bern: Huber.
23.
MarcusE.WelkowitzJ.FeldsteinS.JaffeJ. (1970). Psychological differentiation and the congruence of temporal speech patterns. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey.
24.
MayrE. (1974). Behavior programs and evolutionary strategies. American Scientists, 62, 650–659.
25.
OrlikP. (1987). Ein semantischer Atlas zur Kodierung alltagssprachlicher Verhaltensbeschreibungen nach dem SYMLOG-Raummodell. International Journal of Small Group Research, 3, 88–111.
26.
SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS., (Eds.) (1985). Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
SiegmanA. W.FeldsteinS., (Eds.) (1987). Nonverbal behavior and communication. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
StreetR. L.CappellaJ. N., (Eds.) (1985). Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior. London: Edward Arnold.
29.
TembrockG. (1980). Grundriβ der Verhaltenswissenschaften. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme.
30.
TragerG. L.SmithH. L. (1951). An outline of English structure. Oklahoma: Norman.
31.
WebbJ. T. (1972). Interview synchrony: An investigation of two speech rate measures. In SiegmanA. W.PopeB. (Eds.). Studies in dyadic communication. New York: Pergamon, pp. 115–133.
