Comparing the Structure of Individual and Small Group Perceptions

Abstract

The study reported examines the general assumption that perceptions of stimuli by individuals acting alone match those of interacting groups. This assumption contradicts arguments that groups effectively restructure the organization of the perception of stimuli. These two views were compared in a multidimensional scaling analysis of the structure in group and individual perceptions of crimes. Individuals and four-person groups made paired comparisons of the similarity of 12 crimes. Perceptual judgments by individuals and interacting groups were in general quite similar, providing little support for the cognitive restructuring hypothesis. The results were discussed in terms of pooling and consensus processes that occur during group information processing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carroll

J. D.

Chang

J. J.

(1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283–319.

Chalos

Pickard

(1985). Information choice and cue use: An experiment in group information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 634–641.

Coombs

C. H.

(1967). Thurstone's measurement of social values revisited forty years later. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 85–91.

Davis

J. H.

(1969). Group performance. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Davis

J. H.

(1982). Social interaction as a combinatorial process in group decision. In Brandstätter

Davis

J. H.

Stocker-Kreichgauer

(Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 27–58). London: Academic Press.

Doise

(1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Hinsz

V. B.

Davis

J. H.

(1984). Persuasive arguments theory, group polarization, and choice shifts, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 260–268.

Kelley

H. H.

Thibaut

J. W.

(1969). Group problem solving. In Lindsey

Aronson

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–101). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Nagao

D. H.

Tindale

R. S.

Hinsz

V. B.

Davis

J. H.

(1985). Individual and group biases in information processing. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

10.

Pruzansky

(1975). How to use SINDSCAL: A computer program for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished manuscript. Bell Telephone Laboratories.

11.

Schiffman

S. S.

Reynolds

M. L.

Young

F. W.

(1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Sherif

(1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 5–60.

13.

Steiner

I. D.

(1983). Whatever happened to the touted revival of the group? In Blumberg

H. H.

Hare

A. P.

Kent

Davies

(Eds.), Small groups and social interaction, (Vol. 2, pp. 539–549). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

14.

Thurstone

L. L.

(1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Vollrath

D. A.

Sheppard

B. H.

Hinsz

V. B.

Davis

J. H.

(in press). Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

16.

Weiss

H. M.

Shaw

J. B.

(1979). Social influences on judgments about tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 126–140.