Over the past decade, several computer-based systems have been developed for assistance with group decision making and problem solving. The goal of such systems is to make meetings more productive by increasing the speed at which decisions are reached and to improve the quality of the resulting decisions. Although there are indications that computer assistance has been successful in helping groups fulfill their normal tasks more efficiently, the challenge confronting the next generation of computer-assisted systems is to provide greater support for complex problem situations. The demands of complexity differ from those faced by groups working on more traditional meeting tasks. Computer assistance needs to help groups (a) move beyond the status quo of group problem solving, (b) develop a greater focus on shared meaning, (c) adopt a new view of human rationality, (d) balance technology with the behavioral demands of group work, and (e) emphasize both individual and group learning. Such computer assistance must be developed as an integrated system of planning and design that is conceived with a holistic view of the requirements of complexity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackoff, R. (1979). Creating the corporate future. New York: Wiley.
2.
Aiken, M. , Chen, H., & Copper, S. (1990). Experiences with a group decision support system: A longitudinal study (CMI-WPS 90-64). Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Management Information Systems.
3.
Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Broome, B. J. , & Christakis, A. N. (1988). A culturally sensitive approach to tribal governance issue management. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 107-123.
5.
Broome, B. J. , & Keever, D. B. (1989). Next generation group facilitation: Proposed principles. Management Communication Quarterly, 3, 107-127.
6.
Chen, M. , & Liou, Y. I. (1991). The design of integrated group support environments. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Eds.), The 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 333-342). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
7.
Chen, M. , Liou, Y. I., & Weber, E. S. (in press). Developing intelligent organizations: A context-based approach to individual and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Computing.
8.
Cleveland, H. (1973). The decision makers. Center Magazine, 6(5), 9-18.
9.
Connolly, T. , Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sciences, 36, 689-703.
10.
DeSanctis, G. , & Gallupe, B. (1985). Group decision support systems: A new frontier. Data Base, 16(2), 3-9.
11.
DeSanctis, G. , & Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609.
12.
Dennis, A. R. , George, J. F., Giuseppe, L. M., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. R. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 591-624.
13.
Drucker, P. F. (1988, January/February). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, pp. 45-53.
14.
Easton, A. C. , Vogel, D. R., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1989). Stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: An experimental study. In R. Blanning & D. King (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 344-352). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
15.
Ellis, C. A. , Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications ofACM, 34(l), 38-58.
16.
Folger J. , & Poole, J. (1984). Working through conflict: A communication perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
Grohowski, R. , Vogel, D., Martz, B., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1990). Implementing electronic meeting systems at IBM: Lessons learned and success factors. MIS Quarterly, 14, 369-383.
18.
Grudin, J. (1988, December). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organization interfaces. Paper presented at the Association for Computing Machinery meeting, Portland, OR.
19.
Hirokawa, R. , Gouran, D. S., & Martz, A. E. (1988). Understanding the sources of faulty group decision making: A lesson from the Challenger disaster. Small Group Behavior, 19,411-433.
20.
Huber, G. P. (1984). Issues in the design of group decision support systems, MIS Quarterly, 8, 195-204.
21.
Huseman, R. C. , & Miles, E. W. (1988). Organizational communication in the information age: Implications of computer-based systems. Journal of Management, 14, 181-204.
22.
Janes, F. R. (1988). Interpretive structural modelling: A methodology for structuring complex issues. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 10, 145-154.
23.
Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer support for business teams. New York: Free Press.
26.
Kemeny, J. (1980). Saving American democracy: The lesson of Three Mile Island. Technology Review, 83(7), 64-75.
27.
Kraemer, K. L. , & King, J. L. (1988). Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Computing Surveys, 20, 115-146.
28.
Margolis, H. (1988). Patterns, thinking, and cognition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Mason, R. D. , & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. New York: Wiley.
30.
McDonald, P. (1990). Group support technologies (Study prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation). Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA.
31.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63(2), 81-97.
32.
Moore, C. M. (1987). Group techniques for idea building. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Nappelbaum, E. (in press). Logic of problem formulation and choice. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis.
34.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of theACM, 34(7), 40-61.
35.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity with GDSS. Journal of MIS, 3(4), 5-19.
36.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1988). Computer-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. Journal of Operation Research, 5, 826-848.
37.
Pinsonneault, A. , & Kraemer, K. L. (1989). The impacts of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5, 197-216.
38.
Rittel, H. , & Webber, M. (1974). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. DMG-DRS Journal, 8(1), 31-39.
39.
Roethlisberger, F. J. , & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
41.
Simon, H. A. (1967). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk?Science, 183, 482-488.
43.
Warfield, J. N. (1982). Interpretive structural modeling (ISM). In S. A. Olsen (Ed.), Group planning and problem-solving methods in engineering management (pp. 155-201). New York: Wiley.
44.
Warfield, J. N. (1987). Implications of scale for systems design. Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research International Conference (pp. 1205-1211). Salinas, CA: lntersystems.
45.
Warfield, J. N. (1989). Societal systems: Planning, policy and complexity. Salinas, CA: Intersystems. (Original work published 1976)
46.
Warfield, J. N. (1990). A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Salinas, CA: Intersystems.
47.
Yorks, L. , & Whitsett, D. (1985). Hawthorne, Topeka, and the issue of science versus advocacy in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 10, 21-30.
48.
Zeleny, M. (1989). Cognitive equilibrium: A new paradigm of decision making?Human Systems Management, 8(3), 3-10.
49.
Zeleny, M., & Nappelbaum, E. (1990). Cognitive equilibrium: On pattern stabilization and knowledge organization in decision-producing networks. Unpublished manuscript.
