Seniority Versus Age as Causes of Dominance in Social Groups

Abstract

Seniority systems are fundamental organizing mechanisms of most social groups, but seniority is often confounded with chronological age. An analysis of male dominance orders in troops of Japanese and rhesus macaques showed that seniority within the macaque troops was clearly more predictive of dominance than was mere chronological age. Some quasiexperimental datafrom a sample of humans also revealed that seniority was more important than chronological age in determining employee layoff rankings. The Japanese macaque data camefrom Norikoshi and Koyama 's study of two wild butprovisionedtroops ofmonkeys, each containing 26adult males. The multiple regression of dominance rank on seniority and age produced standardized multiple regression coefficients of .65 and .35 for one troop, whereas thefiguresfor the other troop were .82 and .41, respectively. A secondary analysis of Hill's rhesus macaque data showed that seniority had a standardized multiple regression coefficient of .66, but the coerficientforage was only .16, supporting the Japanese macaque data. Finally, new data from a sample of humans showed a similar pattern When subjects were asked to establish a layoff ranking of hypothetical employees described by seniority and age, their rankings were determined primarily by seniority: The coefficients were. 75 and.10, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, P. M. (1985). The status of age: Preliminary results. Joumal of Gerontology, 40, 506-508.

Baker, P. M. (1988). Participation in small groups: Social, physical, and situational predictors. Small Group Behavior, 19, 3-18.

Baxter, P. T. , & Almagor, U. (1978). Observations about generations. In J. S. LaFontaine (Ed.), Sex and age as principles ofsocial differentiation (pp. 159-181). London: Academic Press.

Berger, J. , Fisek, H. , Nonnan, R. Z. , & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.

Bernardi, B. (1985). Age class systems: Social systems and polities based on age. London: Cambridge University Press.

Bernstein, I. S. , & Gordon, T. P. (1980). The social component of dominance relationships in rhesus. Animal Behavior, 28, 1033-1039.

Chapais, B. (1988). Rank maintenance in female Japanese macaques: Experimental evidence for social dependency. Behavior, 104, 41-59.

Chase, I. D. (1980). Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 45, 905-924.

Crosbie, P. F. (1979). The effects of sex and size on status ranking. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 340-354.

10.

Cumming, E. , & Henry, W. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Eaton, G. G. (1976). The social order of Japanese macaques. Scientific American, 235, 96-106.

12.

Eaton, G. G., & Breedlove, J. L.. (1989). Dominance hierarchies in a confined troop of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): Long-term stability of male, female, and matrilineal rank orders. Unpublished paper.

13.

Fedigan, Laurence . (1991). Life span and reproduction in Japanese macaque females. In L. Fedigan & P. Asquith (Eds.), The monkeys ofArashiyama (pp. 140-154). Albany: State University of New York Press.

14.

Fedigan, Linda . (1982). Primate paradigms: Sex roles and social bonds. Montreal: Eden.

15.

Hill, D. A. (1986). Social relationships between adult male and immature rhesus macaques. Primates, 27, 425-440.

16.

Insko, C. A. , Gilmore, R. , Moehle, D. , Lipsitz, A. , Drenan, S. , & Thibaut, J. W. (1982). Seniority in the generational transition of laboratory groups: The effects of social familiarity and task experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 557-580.

17.

Insko, C. A. , Thibaut, J. W. , Moehle, D. , Wilson, M. , Diamond, W. , Gilmore, R. , Solomon, M. R. , & Lipsitz, A. (1980). Social evolution and the emergence of leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 431-448.

18.

Kawamura, S. (1958). The matriarchal social order in the Minoo-B group: A study on the rank system of Japanese macaques. Primates, 1, 149-156.

19.

Koyama, N. (1970). Changes in dominance rank and division of a wild Japanese monkey troop in Arashiyama. Primates, 11, 335-390.

20.

Mazur, A. (1973). A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. American Sociological Review, 38, 513-530.

21.

Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64, 377-402.

22.

Miller, D. C. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

23.

Mori, A. , Watanabe, K. , & Yamaguchi, N. (1989). Longitudinal changes of dominance rank among the females of the Koshima group of Japanese monkeys. Primates, 30, 147-173.

24.

Norikoshi, K. , & Koyama, N. (1975). Group shifting and social organization among Japanese monkeys. In Proceedings from the Symposia of the Fifth Congress of the International Primatological Society (pp. 43-61). Tokyo: Japanese Science Press.

25.

Ridgeway, C. , & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance andcollective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93.

26.

Riley, M. W. , Foner, A. B. , & Waring, J. (1988). Sociology of age. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), The handbook of sociology (pp. 243-290). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

27.

Webster, M. , & Foschi, M. (Eds.). (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

28.

Williams, L. E. , & Bernstein, I. S. (1983). Introduction and dominance manipulations involving old rhesus males. Folia Primatologica, 40, 175-180.

29.

Wolfe, L. D. (1984). Japanese macaque female sexual behavior. A comparison of Arashiyama East and West. In M. F. Small (Ed.), Female primates: Studies by women primatologists (pp. 141-157). New York: A. R. Liss.