Groupthink is a problem thatplagues decision-making groups. This article reviews antecedent and procedural conditions leading to groupthink and examines productive meeting processes that can prevent groupthink. The article then explores the possible role that group support systems (GSS) may play in the development of these productive meeting processes. Group support systems are an advanced information technology that provide electronic support to groups involved in teamwork. This technology possesses certain inherent resources or structuralfeatures. This article proposes aframeworkfor the study of the effects of GSS on groupthink. It examines the effects of GSS structuralfeatures on antecedent and procedural conditions predisposing groupthink. Existing GSS research relevant to groupthink-related variables is reviewed. The review of GSS structural features and of existing GSS research indicates that GSS use might indeed be an appropriate method of preventing groupthink. Finally, the article proposes a methodologyfor the empirical study of the impact of GSS use on groupthink.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bernthal, P. R. , & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18(1), 66-87.
2.
Bostrom, R. P. , & Anson, R. G. (1992). The face-to-face electronic meeting: A tutorial. In R. P. Bostrom, R. T. Watson, & S. T. Kinney (Eds.), Computer augmented teamwork: A guided tour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3.
Bui, T. , Sivasankaran, T. R., Fijol, Y, & Woodbury, M. A. (1987). Identifying organizational opportunities for GDSS use: Some experimental evidence. Decision Support Systems, 87, 68-75.
4.
Callaway, M. R. , & Esser, J. K. (1984). Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problemsolving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 157-164.
5.
Chidambaram, L. , Bostrom, R. P., & Wynne, B. E. (1991). Alongitudinal study of the impact of group decision support systems on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 7-25.
6.
Clapper, D. L. , McLean, E. R., & Watson, R. T. (1991, December). An experimental investigation of the effect of a group decision support system on normative influence in small groups. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, New York.
7.
Connolly, T. , Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36(6), 689-703.
8.
Courtwright, J. A. (1978). A laboratory investigation of groupthink. Communication Monographs, 45, 229-246.
9.
Culnan, M. J. (1984). The dimensions of accessibility to online information: Implications for implementing office information systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2, 141-150.
10.
Culnan, M. J. , & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies: Electronic media and intraorganizational communication. In L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
DeBono, E. (1989). The meeting of the minds. Executive Excellence, 6(9), 5-6.
12.
Dennis, A. R. , Heminger, A. R., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D.R. (1990). Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience. Information and Management, 18(3), 111-121.
13.
DeSanctis, G. , & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 35(5), 589-609.
14.
Fiske, S. T. , Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1982). Structural models for the mnediation of salience effect on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 105-127.
15.
Flowers, M. L. (1977). A laboratory test of some implications of Janis' groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(12), 888-896.
16.
Fodor, E. M. , & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 178-185.
17.
Gallupe, R. B. , DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 277-298.
18.
George, J. F. , Easton, G. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 394-415.
19.
George, J. F., Northcraft, G. B., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1987). Implications of group decision support system usefor management: Report ofa pilot study. Unpublished working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
20.
Gerstberger, P. , & Allen, T. J. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 272-279.
21.
Gray, P. (1983). Initial observation from the decision room project (pp. 135-138). Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Boston, MA.
22.
Grohowski, R. , McGoff, C., Vogel, D., Martz, B., & Nunamaker, J. (1990). Implementing electronic meeting systems at IBM: Lessons learned and success factors. MIS Quarterly, 14(4), 369-383.
23.
Hiltz, S. R. , &Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47-71.
25.
Huseman, R. C. , & Driver, R. W. (1979). Groupthink: Implications for small group decision making in business. In R. C. Huseman & A. B. Carroll (Eds.), Readings in organizational behavior: Dimensions of management action. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions andfiascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
28.
Jessup, L. M. , Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14(3), 313-321.
29.
Jessup, L. M. , & Kukalis, S. (1990). Better planning using group support systems. Long Range Planning, 23(3), 100-105.
30.
Jessup, L. M. , & Tansik, D. A. (1991). Decision making in an automated environment: The effects of anonymity and proximity with a group decision support system. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 266-279.
31.
Johnson, D. W. , & Tjosvold, D. (1983). Constructive controversy: The key to effective decision-making. In D. Tjosvold & D. W. Johnson (Eds.), Productive conflict management: Perspectives for organizations. New York: Irvington.
32.
Johnson, V. (1990). From the 3M meeting management institute: Future world. Successful Meetings, 39(11), 122-126.
33.
Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of performance of project groups in R & D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 715-728.
34.
Leana, C. R. (1985). A partial test of Janis' groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management, 11(1), 5-17.
35.
Leblanc, L. A., & Kozar, K. A. (1987). The impact of group decision support system technology on vessel safety. Unpublished working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
36.
Levin, I. P. , Johnson, R. D., & Davis, M. L. (1987). How information frame influences risky decisions: Between-subjects and within-subject comparisons. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8(1), 43-54.
37.
Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P. (1982). The potential for "groupthink" in autonomous work groups. Human Relations, 35, 773-784.
38.
McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 250-260.
39.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: Signet.
40.
Miranda, S. M. , & Bostrom, R. P. (1993). The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(3), 63-95.
41.
Moorhead, G. , Ference, R. J., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44(6). 539-550.
42.
Moorhead, G. , & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39(5), 399-410.
43.
Nunamaker, J. F. , Applegate, L. M., & Konzsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 6-19.
44.
Nunamaker, J. F. , Applegate, L. M., & Konzsynski, B. R. (1988). Computer-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. Journal of Operations Research, 36(6), 826-848.
45.
Nunamaker, J. F. , Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the A CM, 34(7), 40-61.
46.
O'Reilly, C. A. (1982). Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academny of Management Journal, 25(4, 756-771.
47.
Pinsonneault, A. , & Kraemer, K. L. (1989). The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5, 197-216.
48.
Poole, M. S. , & DeSanctis, G. (1989, January). Use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Paper presented at the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kona-Kailua, HI.
49.
Poole, M. S. , Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). Conflict management and group decision support systems. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Oregon.
50.
Poole, M. S. , Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computersupported meeting environment. Management Science, 37(8), 926-953.
51.
Putnam, L. L. (1988). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Shepard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
52.
Rahirn, A. (1979). The management of intraorganizational conflicts: A laboratory study with organizational design. Management International Review, 19(1), 97-106.
53.
Raven, B. H. (1974). The Nixon group. Journal of Social Issues, 30, 297-320.
54.
Rice, R. E. (1984). Mediated group communication. In Rice & Associates (Eds.), The new media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Rice, R. E. , & Case, D. (1983). Computer-based messaging in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication, 33(1), 131-152.
56.
Rice, R. E. , & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion. Communication Research, 14(1), 85-108.
57.
Rice, R. E. , & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: The study of new media. In Rice & Associates (Eds.), The new media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
Sambamurthy, V. , & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3(3), 224-251.
59.
Saunders, C. , & Jones, J. W. (1990). Temporal sequences in information acquisition: A focus on source and medium. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 29-45.
60.
Saunders, C. S., Robey, D., & Vaverek, K. A. (1993). The persistence of social differentials in conferencing. Unpublished working paper, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
61.
Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 161-176.
62.
Sharda, R. , Barr, S. H., & McDonnell, J. C. (1988). Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Science, 34(2), 139-159.
63.
Short, J. , William, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
64.
Siegel, J. , Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
65.
Steeb, R. , & Johnston, S. C. (1981). A computer-based interactive system for group decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11, 544-552.
66.
Tetlock, P. E. (1979). Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1314-1324.
67.
Turoff, M. , & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer support: Group versus individual decisions. IEEE Transactions Communications, 30(1), 82-90.
68.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
69.
Van Gundy, A. B. (1984). Managing group creativity. New York: American Management Association.
70.
Vogel, D. R. , & Nunamaker, J. F. (1988). Group decision support system impact: Multimethodological exploration. Information and Management, 18(1), 15-28.
71.
Watson, R. T. , Alexander, M. B., Pollard, C. E., & Bostrom, R. P. (in press). Perceptions of facilitators of a keypad based group support system. Journal of Organizational Computing.
72.
Watson, R. T. , & Bostrom, R. P. (1991). Enhancing group behavior with a keypad based group support system. Human Resources Development Quarterly, 2(4), 333-354.
73.
Whyte, G. (1989). Groupthink reconsidered. Academy ofManagementReview, 14(1), 40-56.
74.
Whyte, G. (1991). Decision failures: Why they occur and how to prevent them. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 23-31.
75.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & Lowe, C. A. (1987). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.
76.
Zigurs, I. , Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L. (1988). A study of influence in computermediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12(4), 625-644.
