There exists a wealth of research examining the effects of democratic and autocratic leadership on group productivity and member satisfaction; however, past reviews of this literature have not systematically integrated the results of available quantitative studies. This essay uses a meta-analysis to provide such an integration. Analysis reveals no correlation between democraticdautocratic leadership style and productivity, except when taking into consideration the influence of study setting and task complexity. Results also suggest that democratic leadership has a moderate positive correlation with member satisfaction, but this relationship may be moderated by task complexity. The conclusion discusses the limits of experimentally manipulating democratic leadership and the need for conceptual refinement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, S. (1952). The American Psychologist, 17, 398-398.
2.
Anderson, R. C. (1959). Learning in discussions: A resume of the authoritarian-democratic studies. Harvard Educational Review, 29, 201-215.
3.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
Barker, L. L. , Wahlers, K. J., Watson, K. W., & Kibler, R. J. (1987). Groups in process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
6.
Beebe, S. A. , & Masterson, J. T. (1990). Communicating in small groups (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
7.
Belwal, U. (1985). Study of the school climate in relation to administrative style. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education, 15(3), 13-16.
8.
Bhushan, I. (1971). A study of leadership preference in relation to authoritarianism and intolerance of ambiguity. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 8, 34-38.
9.
Bhushan, R. , & Verma, N. K. (1972). A study of social determinants of leadership preference. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 9, 81-41.
10.
Bormann, E. G. (1970). The paradox and promise of small group research. Speech Monographs, 37,211-216.
11.
Brilhart, J. K. , & Galanes, G. J. (1989). Effective group discussion. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
12.
Brown, R. (1988). Group processes. New York: Basil Blackwell.
13.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
14.
Busch, H. M. (1934). Leadership in group work. New York: Association.
15.
Chelladurai, P. , Imamura, H., Yamaguchi, Y, Oinuma, Y., & Miyauchi, T. (1988). Sport leadership in a cross-national setting: The case of Japanese and Canadian athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 374-389.
16.
Chelladurai, P. , & Saleh, S. D. (1978). Preferred leadership in sports. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 3, 85-92.
17.
Chelladurai, P. , & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.
18.
Chernyshev, A. S. , & Suryaninova, T. I. (1990). Genesis of the group subject of activity. Soviet Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 3-14.
19.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1986). Communication in small group discussions. New York: West.
21.
Dillard, J. P. (1991). Retrieving effect sizes from ANOVA results. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
Dwyer, J. J. , & Fischer, D. G. (1990). Wrestlers' perceptions of coaches' leadership as predictors of satisfaction with leadership. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 511-517.
23.
Eagly, A. H. , & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
24.
Flanders, N. A. (1951). Personal-social anxiety as a factor in experimental learning situations. Journal of Educational Research, 45, 100-110.
25.
Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group dynamics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26.
Fowler, G. D. , & Rosenfeld, L. B. (1979). Sex differences and democratic leadership behavior. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 45, 69-78.
27.
French, W. L. , Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Understanding human behavior in organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
28.
Garland, D. J. , & Barry, J. R. (1990). Personality and leader behavior in collegiate football: A multidimensional approach to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 355-370.
29.
Gastil, J. (in press). A definition and illustration of democratic leadership. Human Relations.
30.
George, C. S. (1972). The history of management thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Gibb, C. A. (1951). An experimental approach to the study of leadership. Occupational Psychology, 25, 233-248.
32.
Gibb, C. A. (1969). Leadership. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 205-282). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership. New York: Paulist.
34.
Hackett, R. D. , & Guion, R. M. (1985). A reevaluation of the absenteeism-job satisfaction relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision-Making Processes, 35, 340-381.
35.
Hale, J. L. , & Dillard, J. P. (1991). The uses of meta-analysis: Making knowledge claims and setting research agendas. Communication Monographs, 58, 463-471.
36.
Hall, J. A. , & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Testing for moderator variables in meta-analysis: Issues and methods. Communication Monographs, 58,437-448.
37.
Haythorn, W. , Couch, A., Haefner, D., Langham, P., & Carter, L. F. (1956a). The behavior of authoritarian and equalitarian personalities in groups. Human Relations, 9, 57-73.
38.
Haythorn, W. , Couch, A., Haefner, D., Langham, P., & Carter, L. F. (1956b). The effects of varying combinations of authoritarian and equalitarian leaders and followers. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 53, 210-219.
39.
Hunter, J. E. , & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Husband, R. L. (1988). Leading in organizational groups. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication (5th ed., pp. 493-507). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
41.
Isohanni, M. (1990). The organization of the ward treating psychotic patients. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift, 44, 261-267.
42.
Jensen, A. D. , & Chilberg, J. C. (1991). Small group communication. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
43.
Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Kipnis, D. , Schmidt, S., Price, K., & Stitt, C. (1981). Why do I like thee: Is it your performance or my orders?Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 324-328.
45.
Krips, H. (1992). Leadership and social competence in the declining years of communism. Small Group Research, 23, 130-145.
46.
Lawler, E. E. (1984). Leadership inparticipative organizations. In J. G. Hunt, D. M. Hosking, C. A. Schriesheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and managers (pp.316-332). New York: Pergamon.
47.
Lewin, K. , & Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 292-300.
48.
Lewin, K. , Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created 'social climates.' Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-279.
49.
Lewin, M. (1987). Kurt Lewin and the invisible bird on the flagpole: A reply to Graebner. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 123-139.
50.
Ley, R. (1966). Labor turnover as a function of worker differences, work environment, and authoritarianism of foremen. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 497-500.
51.
Likert, R. L. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
Likert, R. L. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Loiseau, L. (1988). Styles de leadership et realite interiere: Analyse binaire classique des variations intrapsychiques [Leadership styles and internal reality: Classical binary analysis of intrapsychic variations]. Revue de Psychologie Appliquee, 38, 59-74.
54.
Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P. (1989). Superleadership. New York: Prentice-Hall.
55.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
56.
Meade, R. D. (1967). An experimental study of leadership in India. Journal of Social Psychology, 72, 35-43.
57.
Meade, R. D. (1985). Experimental studies of authoritarian and democratic leadership in four cultures: American, Indian, Chinese and Chinese-American. High School Journal, 68, 293-295.
58.
Miller, K. I. , & Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29,727-753.
59.
Nagel, J. H. (1987). Participation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
60.
Narain, I. (1964). Democratic decentralization and rural leadership in India: The Rajasthan experiment. Asian Survey, 4, 1013-1022.
61.
O'Keefe, D. J. (1991). Extracting dependable generalizations from the persuasion effects literature: Some issues in meta-analytic reviews. Communication Monographs, 58, 472-481.
62.
Pawlicka, I. (1987). Ocean funkcjonowania kierownikow przez podwladnych i produktywnosc grup zadaniowych w organizacji o strukturze dwuszczeblowej [Subordinates' evaluation of manager functioning and productivity of task groups in two-step structure organizations]. Studia Psychologiczne, 25, 41-51.
63.
Quinn, R. E. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. In J. G. Hunt, D. M. Hosking, C. A. Schriesheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and managers (pp. 10-27). New York: Pergamon.
64.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analyticproceduresforsocial research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65.
Schliesman, E. S. (1987). Relationship between the congruence of preferred and actual leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction with leadership. Journal of Sport Behavior, 10, 157-166.
66.
Segrin, C. (1990). A meta-analytic review of social skill deficits in depression. Communication Monographs, 57, 292-308.
67.
Serpa, S. , Pataco, V., & Santos, F. (1991). Leadership patterns in handball international competition. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 22, 78-89.
68.
Smith, P. C. , Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
69.
Smith, T. V. (1926). The democratic way of life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
Srinivasan, P. T. , & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (1986). Relationship of leadership styles to job involvement: An empirical study. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 12, 53-58.
71.
Starhawk . (1986). Truth or dare. New York: Harper & Row.
72.
Stogdill, R. H. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
73.
Sudolsky, M. , & Nathan, R. (1971). Areplication in questionnaire form of an experiment by Lippitt, Lewin, and White concerning conditions of leadership and social climates in groups. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 4, 188-196.
74.
Tead, O. (1935). The art of leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75.
Tubbs, S. L. (1988). A systems approach to small group interaction (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
76.
Tucker, R. (1981). Politics as leadership. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
77.
Vroom, V. H. , & Mann, F. C. (1960). Leader authoritarianism and employee attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 13, 125-140.
78.
Vroom, V. H. , & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
79.
Vujtech, J. (1972). Problem of style of management of a work group. Synteza, 5, 58-66.
80.
Weiss, M. R. , &Friedrichs, W. D. (1986). The influence of leaderbehaviors, coachattributes, and institutional variables on performance and satisfaction of collegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 332-346.
81.
White, R. K. , & Lippitt, R. (1960). Autocracy and democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
82.
Whitehead, T. N. (1936). Leadership in afree society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
Wilson, G. L. , & Hanna, M. S. (1986). Groups in context. New York: Random House.
84.
Wu-Tien, W. , & Hsiu-Jung, C. (1978). Teacher leadership behavior as related to students' expectation, achievement, and adjustment. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 11, 87-104.
85.
Yukl, G. A. , & Kanuk, L. (1979). Leadership behavior and effectiveness of beauty salon managers. Personnel Psychology, 32, 663-675.
