Agreement as a Function of Initial Choice and Stay Response Probabilities in Status Characteristics Research

Abstract

Expectation states theories of status processes have consistently shown that participation and influence patterns in groups are a function of differences in external status characteristics. A branch of this theoretical research program, Status Characteristics Theory (SCT) deals specifically with the processes by which external status characteristics come to determine the allocation of status positions within groups. The authors pose three arguments relevant to this program. First, agreement on thefinal choice is a much more likely outcome than disagreement in situations that meet most of the conditions of the standardized experimental setting, even when the probability of staying with one's own answer given disagreement is highfor group members. Second, agreement is yet more likely to be thefinal outcome in groups that are differentiated on some status characteristic that leads to differential likelihood of staying with one's own initial choice. Third, cooperative allocation of status position is more likely to occur in these groups than competitive position allocation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 171-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.

Balkwell, J. (1991). From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for Expectation States Theory. American Sociological Review, 56, 355-369.

Balkwell, J. , Berger, J. , Webster, M., Jr. , Nelson-Kilger, M. , & Cashen, J. (1992). Processing status information. In E. J. Lawler , B. Markovsky , C. L. Ridgeway , & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 1-20). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Berger, J. , Fisek, M. H. , Norman, R. Z. , & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.

Berger, J. , Norman, R. Z. , Balkwell, J. , & Smith, L. F. (1992). Status inconsistency in task situations: Atest of four status processing principles. American Sociological Review, 57, 843-855.

Driskell, J. E. , Olmstead, B. , & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 78, 51-60.

Fararo, T. , & Skvoretz, J. (1986). E-state structuralism: A theoretical method. American Sociological Review, 51, 591-602.

Fisek, M. H. , Norman, R. Z. , & Nelson-Kilger, M. (1992). Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and a test. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16, 285-303.

Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367-386.

10.

Ridgeway, C. L. , & Berger, J. (1988). The legitimation of power and prestige orders in task groups. In M. Webster, Jr., & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 207-231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

11.

Ridgeway, C. L. , & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93.

12.

Wagner, D. , & Berger, J. (1993). Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs (pp. 23-63). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

13.

Webster, M., Jr. , & Foschi, M. (Eds.). (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.