The project investigated the power dynamics in preexisting corporate research and development teams using a network-based methodology. Emerson's (1962) exchange-based power-dependence theory was used to formulate guiding hypotheses. In addition, Thompson's (1967) typology of organizational interdependence was used to differentiate between types of task interdependence. Power was operationalized as the amount of influence each member exerted about decisions regarding coworkers and/or the team. Heightened task dependence was expected to negatively affect personal power The different kinds of task interdependence were found to have very different power implications. Thompson's distinction between sequential and reciprocal task interdependence was necessary to untangle the underlying power-dependence processes. Furthermore, the findings leave much to be explained and might suggest the need to consider additional interdependence dynamics and/or alternative exchange frameworks to more accurately accountfor the personal power dynamics in the collective context offormal organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H. (1982). The origins and persistence of social networks: A comment In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 281-294). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Astley, W. G. , & Sachdeva, P. S. (1984). Structural sources of intraorganizational power: A theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 9, 104-113.
3.
Astley, W. G. , & Zajac, E. J. (1990a). Intraorganizational power and organizational design: Reconciling rational and coalitional models of organization (Working Paper No. 19906). Denver: University of Colorado, College of Business Administration.
4.
Astley, W. G. , & Zajac, E. J. (1990b). Beyond dyadic exchange: Functional interdependence and subunit power (Working Paper No. 1990-10). Denver: University of Colorado, College of Business Administration.
5.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Blau, P. (1982). Structural sociology and network analysis: An overview. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 273-280). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
8.
Brass, D. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.
9.
Burt, R. (1980). Autonomy in a social topology. American Journal of Sociology, 85(4), 892-925.
10.
Burt, R. (1982). A note on cooptation and definitions of constraint. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 219-234). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Cook, K. (1982). Network structures from an exchange perspective. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 177-200). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Cook, K. (Ed.). (1987). Social exchange theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Cook, K. , & Emerson, R. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.
14.
Cook, K. , Emerson, R., Gillmore, M., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275-305.
15.
Cook, K. , Yamagishi, T., & Gillmore, M. (1986). Point and line vulnerability as bases for predicting the distribution of power in exchange networks: Reply to Willer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 445-448.
16.
Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
18.
Emerson, R. (1972a). Exchange theory: Part 1. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 38-57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Emerson, R. (1972b). Exchange theory: Part 2. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58-87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
Emerson, R. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.
21.
Emerson, R. (1981). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Tumer (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30-65). New York: Basic Books.
22.
Franz, R. (1991). An embedded-exchange theory of power in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Department of Sociology.
23.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1982). Modes of resource allocation: Corporate contributions to non-profit organizations. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 235-254). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Gillmore, M. (1987). Implications of general versus restricted exchange. In K. Cook (Ed.), Social Exchange Theory (pp. 170-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Hickson, D. , Hinings, C., Lee, C., Schneck, R., & Pennings, J. (1971, June). A strategic contingencies ' theory of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 216-229.
26.
Hinings, C. , Hickson, D., Pennings, J., & Schneck, R. (1974, March). Structural conditions of intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 22-44.
27.
Homans, G. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
28.
Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementaryforms. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
29.
Lachman, R. (1989, June). Power from what? A reexamination of its relationship with structural conditions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 231-251.
30.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). Elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon.
31.
Lovaglia, M. J. , Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., & Markovsky, B. (1995). Negotiated exchanges in social networks. Social Forces, 74(1), 123-155.
32.
Markovsky, B. , Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., Lovaglia, M., & Erger, J. (1993, April). The seeds of weak power: An extension of network exchange theory. American Sociological Review, 58, 197-209.
33.
Markovsky, B. , Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220-236.
34.
Marsden, P. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
35.
Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
36.
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Power and politics in organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
38.
Pfeffer, J. , & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
39.
Roethlisberger, F. , & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Shrader, C. , Lincoln, J., & Hoffman, A. (1989). The network structures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations, 42(1), 43-66.
41.
Skinner, R. , & Guiltinar, S. (1986). Extra-network linkages, dependence and power. Social Forces, 64(3), 702-713.
42.
Skvoretz, J. , & Willer, D. (1991). Power in exchange networks: Setting and structural variations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), 224-238.
43.
Skvoretz, J. , & Willer, D. (1993, December). Exclusion and power: A test of four theories of power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 58, 801-818.
44.
Taylor, F. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: HarperCollins.
45.
Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46.
Tichy, N. (1981). Networks in organizations. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 2 (pp. 225-249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Tichy, N. , Tushman, M., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519.
48.
Van de Ven, A. , Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig Jr., R. (1976, April). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-338.
49.
Willer, D. (1986). Vulnerability and the location of power positions. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 441-448.
50.
Willer, D. , & Anderson, B. (Eds.). (1981). Networks: Exchange and coercion. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
51.
Willer, D. , Markovsky, B., & Patton, T. (1989). Power structures: Derivations and applications of elementary theory. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: Newformulations (pp. 313-353). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
Willer, D. , & Patton, T. (1987). The development of network exchange theory. In E. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 4, pp. 199-242). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53.
Yamagishi, T. , Gillmore, M., & Cook, K. (1988). Network connections and the distribution of power. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 833-851.
