Although learning in the system dynamics approach is generally accomplished through student model creation, there are many cases where learning may be better facilitated through incorporation of system dynamics models into more guided simulations. A model of simulation design is described and illustrated wherein designers create models in a system dynamics package and then transfer those models into a general instructional authoring system for the addition of instructional support features.
Alessi, S. M.
(1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(2), 40-47.
2.
Alessi, S. M.
(1995). Dynamic versus static fidelity in a procedural simulation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
3.
Alessi, S. M.
, & Trollip, S. R. (1991). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Anderson, J. R.
(1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
5.
AUTHORWARE 4. Macromedia. (1997). San Francisco: Macromedia (600 Townsend Street, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA).
6.
Choi, W.
(1997). Designing effective scenarios for computer-based instructional simulation: Classification of essential features. Educational Technology, 37(5), 13-21.
7.
COCOA. Apple Computer. (1997). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer (1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014-2084, USA).
8.
de Jong, T.
,& van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
9.
Guckenberger, D.
, & Guckenberger, E. (1996). Above real-time training theory: Implications of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, & learning theory in simulator training. Orlando, FL: Institute for Simulation and Training.
10.
Mandinach, E. B.
, & Cline, H. F. (1994). Classroom dynamics: Implementing a technology-based learning environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Pappo, H. A.
(1998). Simulations for skills training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
12.
Reigeluth, C. M.
(1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 80-86.
13.
Reigeluth, C. M.
, & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1-10.
14.
Resnick, M.
(1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
15.
SIMCITY 2000. Maxis. (1993). Orinda, CA: Maxis (2121 North California Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-7306, USA).
16.
SIMFOUNDRY. Drummond, B., Kim, H.-s., & Vovides, Y. (1997). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
17.
STELLA II. High Performance Systems, Inc. (1994). Hanover, NH: High Performance Systems (45 Lyme Road, Suite 300, Hanover, NH 03755-1221, USA).
18.
Swaak, J.
, van Joolingen, W. R.,& de Jong, T. (1998). Supporting simulation-based learning: The effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 8(3), 235-252.
19.
TOOLBOOKII INSTRUCTOR. Asymetrix Learning Systems. (1997). Bellevue, WA: Asymetrix Learning Systems (110 110th Avenue NE, Suite 700, Bellevue, WA 98004, USA).
20.
Wenger, E.
(1987). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
