Computer games are now becoming ways to communicate, teach, and influence attitudes and behavior. In this article, we address the role of humor in computer games, especially in support of serious purposes. We begin with a review of the main theories of humor, including superiority, incongruity, and relief. These theories and their interrelationships do well in helping us understand the humor process, but they have been developed in the context of traditional human activity. To explore how they relate to computer games, we present the findings of a qualitative study of player experience of humor and show how it relates to the theoretical perspectives. We then review the main functions of humor, especially its effects on social, emotional, and cognitive behavior. We show how each of these functions can be used in game design to support the specific experiences and outcomes of game-play. Finally, we address the issue of serious games and make suggestions on how humor can inform and support the design of those games. We suggest that humor can support design by smoothing and sustaining the game mechanics. Moreover, games can draw on the functions of humor in the real world for enhancing communication, learning, and social presence. Using humor makes games richer and more powerful, as well as fun.
Apperly, T.H. ( 2006). Genre and game studies. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 37(1), 6-23.
2.
Attardo, S. ( 1994). Linguistic theories of humor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
Attardo, S. ( 2008). A primer for the linguistics of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humor research (pp. 101-156). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
4.
Beebe, B.R. ( 2007). No laughing matter: Student perceptions of instructional use of humor in the college classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
5.
Berger, A.A. ( 1993). An anatomy of humor. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
6.
Bergson, H. ( 1970). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic Œuvres . Paris: Presse Universitaire de France, 382-485.
7.
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. ( 2001, March-April). Relational agents: A model and implementation of building user trust. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI01), Seattle, Washington.
8.
Billig, M. ( 2005). Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humor . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Bogost, I. ( 2009). Persuasive Games Announces the Release of the Mobile Game 'Airport Insecurity'; Harpooned, an anti-whaling game; Destroy Zimbabwe in Simbabwe 1.0. Retrieved March 30, 2009, from the Water Cooler Games Web site at www.watercoolergames.orghttp://www.watercoolergames.org/archives/000488.shtml; http://www.watercoolergames.org/mt-search.cgi?search=harpooned&Submit1=go ; http://www.watercoolergames.org/mtsearch.cgi?search=SIMBABWE&Submit1=go
10.
Boyd, B. ( 2004). Laughter and literature: A play theory of humor. Philosophy and Literature, 28(1), 1-22.
11.
Caillois, R. ( 1958). Les jeux et les hommes. Paris: Gallimard.
12.
Carr, D. ( 2005). Contexts, gaming pleasures, and gendered preferences . Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 36, 464-482.
13.
Clarke, A. ( 2008). The pattern recognition theory of humor: An outline. Cumbria: Pyrrhic House.
14.
Coleman, J. ( 1992). All seriousness aside: The laughing-learning connection . International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(3), 269-276.
15.
Cox, B. ( 1999). Achieving intercultural communication through computerized business simulation/games. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 38-50.
16.
Dion, C. ( 2007). Laughter and humour in second-language learning and teaching Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
17.
Dormann, C., Biddle, R., & Barr, P. ( 2006, July). Humor theory in videogames: Laughter in the slaughter . Paper presented at the ACM SIGGRAPH Video Game Symposium, Boston, Massachusetts.
18.
Dormann, C., Caquard, S., Wood, B., & Biddle, R. ( 2006). Role-playing games in cybercartography: Multiple perspectives and critical thinking. Cartographica, 41(1), 47-58.
19.
Ducheneaut, N., & Moore, R.J. ( 2004, November). The social side of gaming: A study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , Chicago, Illinois.
20.
Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. ( 2006, April). "Alone together?" Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI06), Chicago, Illinois.
21.
Fine, G.A., & De Soucey, M. ( 2005). Joking cultures: Humor theories as social regulation in group life. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research , 18, 1-22.
22.
Francis, L., Monahan, K., & Berger, C. ( 1999). A laughing matter? The uses of humor in medical interactions . Motivation and Emotion, 23(2), 155-174.
23.
Freud, S. ( 1960). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Fugate, F.D. ( 1998). The advertising of services: What is an appropriate role of humor? The Journal of Services Marketing, 12(6), 34-72.
25.
Gallivan, J. ( 1999). Gender and humor: What makes a difference? North American Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 307-318.
26.
Gamespot. (2005). A brief history of video game humor. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from the Gamespot Web site at www.gamespot.com/features/6114407/p-2.html
27.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. ( 2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 33, 441-467.
28.
Glaser, B.G. ( 1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
29.
Goldsmith, D. ( 2001). Communication, humor and personality: Students’ attitudes to learning online. Academic Exchange Quarterly , 5, 108.
30.
Gruner, C. ( 1976). Wit and humor in mass communication. In A. Chapman & H. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 287-310). London: Wiley.
31.
Gruner, C. ( 1997). The Game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
32.
Gulas, C.S., & Weinberger, M.G. (2006). Humor in advertising: A comprehensive analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
33.
Hampes, W.P. ( 2001). Relation between humor and empathic concern. Psychological Reports, 88, 241-244.
34.
Hobbes, T. ( 1840). Works. London: Molesworth.
35.
Keith-Spiegel, P. ( 1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp. 4-39). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. ( 1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in "dread courses." College Student Journal , 33(3), 400-407.
37.
Koestler, A. ( 1964). The act of creation. London: Macmillan.
38.
Kücklich, J. ( 2001, September). Literary theory and computer games. Paper presented at the COSIGN 2001, the First International Conference on Computational Semiotics for Games and New Media, Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
39.
Lazzaro, N. ( 2004, March). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion in player experiences. Paper presented at the Games Developers Conference, San Jose, California. Retrieved September 1, 2007, from www.xeodesign.com/whyweplaygames.html
40.
Lynch, O. ( 2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12(4), 423-445.
41.
Madsen, H., & Johansson, T.D. (2002, June). Gameplay rhetoric: A study of the construction of satirical and associational meaning in short computer games for the WWW. Proceedings of the Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, June 6-8, 2002 (pp. 73-88). Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
42.
Martin, R. ( 2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 12(4), 504-519.
43.
Martin, R. ( 2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
44.
Martin, A., & Reigeluth, C. ( 1999). Affective education and the affective domain: Implications for instructional-design theories and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 485-509). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Meyer, J. ( 2000). Humor as double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10, 310-331.
46.
Morreall, J. ( 1983). Taking laughter seriously. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
47.
Morreall, J. ( 2004).Verbal humor without switching scripts and without non-bona fide communication. International Journal of Humor Research , 17(4), 393-400.
48.
Mulder, M.P., & Nijholt, A. ( 2002). Humor research: State of the art. CTIT Technical Report series, 02-34. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.ub.utwente.nl/webdocs/ctit/1/0000009e.pdf
49.
Nijholt, A. ( 2002, April). Embodied agents: A new impetus to humor research . Paper presented at the April Fools Day Workshop on Computational Humor (TWLT20), Trento, Italy. Retrieved January 6, 2007, from http://hmi.ewi.utwente.nl/Conferences/chi2003-workshop/papers/nijholt.pdf
50.
Raskin, V. ( 1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Boston : Kluwer Academic, 10.
51.
Rockstar Games. (n.d.). Grand Theft Auto IV . Accessed March 30, 2009, at www.rockstar-games.com/IV
52.
Roeckelein, J.E. ( 2002). The psychology of humor: A reference guide and annotated bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
53.
Ruch, W. ( 2002). Computers with a personality? Lessons to be learned from studies of the psychology of humor. Paper presented at the April Fools Day Workshop on Computational Humor (TWLT20), Trento, Italy. Retrieved January 6, 2007, from www.uniduesseldorf.de/WWW./MathNat/Ruch/Texte/TrentoRuch.pdf
54.
Sawyer, B., & Smith, P. ( 2008). Serious games taxonomy. Serious games initiative. Retrieved December 15, 2008, from www.seriousgames.org/presentations/serious-games-taxonomy-2008_web.pdf
55.
Sheldon, K., & Biddle, B. ( 1998). Standards, accountability and school reform: Perils and pitfalls. Teachers College Record, 10(1), 164-180.
56.
Speck, P. ( 1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising , 13, 1-44.
57.
Steele, K.E. ( 1998). The positive and negative effects of the use of humor in the classroom setting. Unpublished master’s dissertation, Salem-Teikyo University.
58.
Tychsen, A., & Smith, B. ( 2008, November). Game format effects on communication in multiplayer games. Paper presented at the ACM Future Play International Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
59.
Vandaele, J. ( 2002). Humor mechanisms in film comedy: Incongruity and superiority . Poetics Today, 23(2), 221-249.
Wilson, K.A., Bedwell, W.L., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Estock, J.L., et al. (2008). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Prepublished August 26, 2008. DOI:10.1177/1046878108321866.
62.
Wright, T., Boria, E., & Breidenbach, P. (2002). Creative player actions in FPS online video games, playing Counter-Strike. Game Studies, The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 2(2). Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://gamestudies.org/0202/wright
63.
Zijderveld, A. ( 1983). The sociology of humor and laughter. Current Sociology, 3, 1-64.
64.
Ziv, A. ( 1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication . Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 5-15.
