This article explores research on the use of computerized games and simulations in language education. The author examined the psycholinguistic and sociocultural constructs proposed as a basis for the use of games and simulations in computer-assisted language learning. Research in this area is expanding rapidly. However, to date, few studies have critically investigated this body of work. The author reviewed key findings from influential studies. The author’s analysis reveals that, although these studies are subject to limitations, simulations and games present valuable opportunities for effective language learning. The contemporary literature on theories of language acquisition hypothesizes that simulations and games are beneficial methods for helping learners acquire another language. This article concludes by identifying potential areas for future research.
ACTIVE WORLDS. (1997). Las Vegas, NV: Active Worlds (101 Convention Center Drive, Suite 700, Las Vegas, NV 89109, USA).
2.
Ang, C.S., & Zaphiris, P. ( 2006). Developing enjoyable second language learning software tools: A computer game paradigm. In P. Zaphiris & G. Zacharia (Eds.), User-centered computer aided language learning (pp. 1-22). New York: Idea Group.
3.
Ang, C.S., & Zaphiris, P. ( 2007). Computer games and language learning. In T. Kid & H. Song (Eds.), Handbook of research on instructional systems & technology (pp. 449-462). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
4.
Baltra, A. ( 1990). Language learning through computer adventure games. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 445-452.
5.
Bryant, T. ( 2006). Using World of Warcraft and other MMORPGs to foster a targeted, social, and cooperative approach toward language learning. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/bryant-MMORPGs-for-SLA
6.
Bryant, T. ( 2008). From Age of Empires to Zork: Using games in the classroom . Retrieved June 18, 2009, from http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/gamesinclassroom
7.
Chapelle, C. ( 1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms?Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43. Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chapelle/default.html
8.
Chapelle, C.A. ( 2001). Innovative language learning: Achieving the vision. ReCALL, 13, 3-14.
9.
Coleman, D.W. ( 1990). Computerized simulations and games for language learning: Part 1. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 21, 443-444.
10.
Coleman, D.W. ( 2002). On foot in SIM CITY: Using SIM COPTER as the basis for an ESL writing assignment. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 217-230.
11.
Crookall, D., Coleman, D., & Versluis, E. ( 1990). Computerized language learning simulation: Form and content . In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 165-182). New York: Newbury House.
12.
Donaldson, R.P. & Kötter, M. ( 1999). Language learning in cyberspace: Teleporting the classroom into the target culture. CALICO Journal, 16, 531-557.
13.
Donato, R., & McCormick, D. ( 1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. Modern Language Journal, 78, 453-464.
14.
Freiermuth, M. ( 2002). Connecting with computer science students by building bridges. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 3, 299-315.
15.
Garcia-Carbonell, A., Rising, B., Montero, B., & Watts, F. ( 2001). Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 481-491.
16.
Gass, S.M. ( 2000). Changing views of language learning. In H. Trappes-Lomax (Ed.), Change and continuity in applied linguistics: Selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics Edinburgh (pp. 51-67). Edinburgh, UK: British Association of Applied Linguistics.
17.
Gee, J.P. ( 2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan .
18.
Higgins, J.J., & Morgenstern, D. (1990). Simulations on computers: Elements and examples. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 183-190). New York: Newbury House.
19.
Ho, J., & Crookall, D. ( 1995). Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: Learner autonomy in English language teaching. System, 23, 235-243.
20.
Johnson, W.L. ( 2007). Series use of a serious game for language learning. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, & J. E. Greer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 67-74). Amsterdam : IOS Press.
21.
Johnson, W., & Wu, S. ( 2008). Assessing aptitude for learning with a serious game for foreign language learning. In B. Woolf , E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambo, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 520-529). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22.
Jones, G. ( 1986). Computer simulations in language teaching: The kingdom experiment. System, 14, 171-178.
23.
Jones, K. ( 1982). Simulations in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Jordan, G. ( 1992). Exploiting computer-based simulations for language learning purposes. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal , 23, 88-98.
25.
Kötter, M. ( 2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems . Language Learning & Technology, 7, 145-172. Retrieved June 28, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/default.html
26.
Krashen, S. ( 1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
27.
Lantolf, J.P. ( 2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
Li, R.C., & Topolewski, D. (2002). ZIP & TERRY: A new attempt at designing language learning simulation. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 181-186.
29.
Long, M. ( 1985). Input, interaction and second language acquisition theory . In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
30.
Long, M. ( 1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Richie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Mak, L., & Crookall, D. ( 1995). Project IDEALS: Social interaction and negotiation via cross-cultural simulation. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners (pp. 225-228). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
32.
Meskill, C. ( 1990). Where in the world is Carmen San Diego?Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 457-460.
33.
Meskill, C. ( 1999). Computer as tools for sociocolaborative language learning . In Cameron, K. (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Media design and applications (pp. 141-162). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
34.
Mich, O., Betta, E., & Giuliani, D. ( 2004). PARLING: e-Literature for supporting children learning English as a second language. In N. J. Nunes & C. Rich (Eds.), IUI’04 (pp. 283-285). New York: ACM Press .
35.
Noel, R.C., Crookall, D., Wilkenfeld, J., & Schapira, L. ( 1987). Network gaming: A vehicle for international communication . In D. Crookall, C. S. Greenblat, A. Coote, J. Klabbers, & D. Watson (Eds.), Simulation-gaming in the late 1980s (pp. 5-21). Oxford , UK: Pergamon.
36.
Ortega, L. ( 1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion . Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
37.
Peterson, M. ( 2001). MOOs and second language acquisition: Towards a rationale for MOO-based learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 14, 443-459.
38.
Peterson, M. ( 2004). MOO virtual worlds in CMC-based CALL: Defining an agenda for future research. In S. Jeong-Bae (Ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Pedagogies and technologies (pp. 39-59). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
39.
Peterson, M. ( 2005). Learning interaction in an avatar-based virtual environment: A preliminary study. PacCALL Journal, 1(1), 29-40.
40.
Peterson, M. ( 2006). Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 79-103.
41.
Pica, T. ( 1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes. Language Learning , 44, 493-527.
42.
Prensky, M. ( 2000). Digital game-based learning. New York : McGraw-Hill.
43.
Purushotma, R. ( 2005). Commentary: You’re not studying you’re just . Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 80-96. Retrieved August 2, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num1/purushotma/default.html
44.
Ranalli, J. ( 2008). Learning English with The Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 441-455.
45.
Scarcella, R., & Crookall, D. ( 1990). Simulation/gaming and language acquisition. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 223-230). New York: Newbury House.
46.
Schneider, J., & Von Der Emde, S. (1998). MOOSSIGGANG. Poughkeepsie, NY: Vassar College.
47.
Schroeder, R. ( 2002). Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 1-16). London : Springer.
48.
Schwienhorst, K. ( 1998). The "third place": Virtual reality applications for second language learning. ReCALL, 10(1), 118-126.
49.
Schwienhorst, K. ( 2002a). Evaluating tandem language learning in the MOO: Discourse repair strategies in a bilingual Internet project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 135-146.
50.
Schwienhorst, K. ( 2002b). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 196-209.
51.
Shield, L. ( 2003). MOO as a language learning tool. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 97-122). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
52.
Simcopter. (1996). Walnut Creek, CA Maxis Software.
53.
Sørensen, B.H., & Meyer, B. ( 2007). Serious games in language learning and teaching: A theoretical perspective. In Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference (pp. 559-566). Tokyo. Digital Games Research Association.
54.
Stanley, I., & Mawer, K. ( 2008). Language learners & computer games: From space invaders to second life. TESL-EJ, 11, 1-12. Retrieved March 12, 2009 , from http://tesl-ej.org/ej44/toc.html
55.
Steinkuehler, C. ( 2005). Cognition & learning in massively multiplayer online games: A critical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
56.
Stubbs, K. ( 2003, April). Kana no senshi (kana warrior): a new interface for learning Japanese characters. Poster session presented at the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
57.
Surface, E.A., Dierdorff, E.C., & Watson, A. ( 2007). Special operations language training software measurement of effectiveness study: Tactical Iraqi study final report. Tampa, FL: Special Operations Forces Language Office .
58.
Svensson, P. ( 2003). Virtual worlds as arenas for language learning. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning on-line: Towards best practice (pp. 123-142). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
59.
TACTICAL LANGUAGE AND CULTURE TRAINING SYSTEM. (2003). Los Angeles: Alelo (11965 Venice Boulevard, Suite 409, Los Angeles, CA 90066, USA).
60.
Taylor, M. ( 1990). Simulations and adventure games in CALL. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 461-466.
61.
THE SIMS. (2000). San Mateo, CA: Electronic Arts (1450 Fashion Island Boulevard, San Mateo, CA 94404, USA).
62.
Thorne, S.L. ( 2008). Transcultural communication in open internet environments and massively multiplayer online games. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 305-327). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63.
Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. ( 2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology , 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved September 12, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/toyoda/
64.
Von Der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). Modern Language Journal, 85, 211-225.
65.
Vygotsky, L. ( 1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
66.
Warner, C.N. ( 2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 69-87. Retrieved August 22, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/warner/default.html
67.
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. ( 1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24(1), 1-14.
68.
WORLD OF WARCRAFT. (2001). Irvine, CA: Blizzard Entertainment (Irvine, CA 92623, USA).
