An Empirical Test of Rawls's Theory of Justice: A Second Approach,in Korea and the United States

Abstract

The authors conduct an experimental/empirical test of Rawls's theory of justice with subjects from Korea and the United States. The subjects begin from Rawls's "original position." Then, from behind this study's experimental "veil of ignorance," they simulate Rawls's "derivation" of principles of distributive justice, both individually and collectively. The authors explore and attempt to explain the cross-cultural differences. The design of this study borrows from earlier (1987) tests conducted by Frohlich, Oppenheimer, and Eavey who found no support for Rawls. But significant differences in this study's approach make this an independent test. The authors find partial empirical support for Rawls's difference principle among the Korean subjects only and suggest that his assumptions and reasoning need to be refined to better account for concerns and considerations beyond levels of income and the balancing of individual monetary interests.

Keywords

cross-cultural distributive justice Korea original position Rawls simulation veil of ignorance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barry, B. (1973). A liberal theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon.

Blocker, H. G. , & Smith, E. M. (1980). John Rawls' theory of social justice: An introduction. Athens: Ohio University Press.

Daniels, N. (Ed.). (1975). Reading Rawls: Critical studies on Rawls' A theory of justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Fisk, M. (1975). History and Reason in Rawls' Moral Theory. In N. Daniels (Ed.), Reading Rawls: Critical studies on Rawls' A theory of justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Frohlich, N. , & Oppenheimer, J.A. (1989). Principles of distributive justice: An empirical approach. Unpublished manuscript.

Frohlich, N. , Oppenheimer, J. A. , & Eavey, C. L. (1987a). Laboratory results on Rawls' distributive justice. British Journal of Political Science, 17, 1-21.

Frohlich, N. , Oppenheimer, J. A. , & Eavey, C. L. (1987b). Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 606-636.

Hahm, P. (1967). The Korean political tradition and the law. Seoul: Seoul Computer Press.

Henderson, G. (1968). Korea: The politics of the vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Henderson, G. (1987). Grappling with the Korean persona. In R. A. Morse (Ed.), Wild asters: Exploration in Korean thought, culture, and society. New York: University Press of America.

11.

Lissowski, G. , Tyszka, T. , & Okrasa, W. (1988). Principles of distributive justice: Preferences of Polish and American students. Unpublished manuscript.

12.

Martin R. , (1985). Rawls and rights. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

13.

Mitchell, T. (1986). Generational change and Confucianism. Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch (Vol. 61).

14.

Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

15.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

16.

Schaefer, D. (1979). Justice or tyranny? A critique of John Rawls's theory of justice. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.

17.

Soltan, K. E. (1982). Empirical studies of distributive justice. Ethics, 92, 673-691.

18.

Wolff, R. P. (1977). Understanding Rawls: A reconstruction and critique of A Theory of Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.