A Comparison of Live Instruction and Interactive Televised Teaching: A 2-Year Assessment of Teaching an MSW Research Methods Course

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the performance and experiences of distance learning students enrolled in a graduate-level foundation social work research methods course. Method: Students who received face-to-face instruction in a media-readied classroom on the main campus of the university were compared with their remote classmates who simultaneously received course instruction at a regional campus via interactive television (ITV). Students’ performance in the course was evaluated. In addition, students’ attitudes toward distance education as well as their experiences in this course were assessed and compared. Results: The findings illustrate there were no statistically significant differences in students’ performance or attitudes and only minor differences in the assessment of their experiences in the course. Conclusions: With no statistically significant differences found in students’ performance or experiences, ITV appears to be a viable technological option for schools of social work to deliver research methods courses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barker, B. (1992). The distance education handbook. An administrator’s guide for rural and remote schools. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Beare, P. (1989). The comparative effectiveness of videotape, audiotape, and telelecture in delivering continuing teacher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 57-66.

Blakely, T. J. (1992). A model for distance education delivery. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 214-221.

Blakely, T. J. (1994). Strategies for distance learning. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6, 4-7.

Cnaan, R. A. (1989). Introduction: Social work practice and information technology—An established link. Computers in Human Services, 5, 1-15.

Falk, D. R. , Shepard, M. F. , Campbell, J. A. , & Maypole, D. E. (1992). Current and potential applications of interactive videodiscs in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 6, 117-136.

Haga, M. , & Heitkamp, T. (1995). Evaluation results of an innovative social work distance education program. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Diego, CA.

Heitkamp, T. (1995). Social work education at a distance: An innovative approach. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Diego, CA

Hult, R. E. (1980). The effectiveness of university television instruction and factors influencing student attitudes. College Student Journal, 14, 5-7.

10.

Jennings, J. , Siegel, E. , & Baskind, F. R. (1992). Teaching techniques for instructional interactive television. Warrenton, VA: Learning Technology Institute.

11.

Jones, A. , Putt, R. , & Store, R. (1982). Teaching welfare work and social work: Is distance education an option? Contemporary Social Work Education, 5, 128-147.

12.

Kelley, P. (1993). Teaching through telecommunications. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 7, 63-74.

13.

McNeil, D. R. (1991). Computer conferencing project: Final report. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development, Inc.

14.

Patchner, M. E. , Petracchi, H. E. , & Wise, S. (1998). Outcomes of ITV and face-to-face instruction in a social work methods course. Journal of Computers in Human Services, 15, 23-38.

15.

Petracchi, H. E. (1998). The combined use of video and one-way broadcast technology to deliver baccalaureate education: A comparative assessment of student learning in a school of social work. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work Education, 4, 51-60.

16.

Petracchi, H. E. (2000). Distance learning: What do our students tell us? Research on Social Work Practice, 10(3), 362-376.

17.

Petracchi, H. E. , & Morgenbesser, M. B. (1995). The use of video and one-way broadcast technology to deliver continuing social work education: A comparative assessment of student learning. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6, 18-22.

18.

Siegel, E. , Jennings, J. G. , Conklin, J. , & Flynn, S.A.N. (1998). Distance learning in social work education: Results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 71-80.

19.

Spirek, M. (1995, August). The impact of Math Boosters on its viewing audiences: An external multi method assessment of the 1994-1995 season. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.

20.

Thyer, B. A. , Artelt, T. , Markward, M. K. , & Dozier, C. D. (1998). Evaluating distance learning in social work education: A replication study. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 291-295.

21.

Thyer, B. A. , Polk, G. , & Gaudin, J. G. (1997). Distance learning in social work education: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 363-367.

22.

Weinbach, R. W. , Gandy, J. T. , & Tartaglia, L. J. (1984). Addressing the need of the part-time student through interactive closed-circuit television: An evaluation. Arete, 9, 12-20.