The End of Quantitative Research in Social Work? The Threat Posed by Postmodern/Critical Theory's Increasing Colonization of Academia

Abstract

Quantitative research plays an instrumental role in facilitating health and wellness. Effective interventions are developed, assessed, and refined through the application of logic and empirical evidence in a scientific milieu characterized by diverse views. However, the increasing colonization of academic discourse by postmodern/critical theory (PCT) may undermine foundational concepts upon which quantitative research rests. The postpositivist tradition in which quantitative methods are embedded emphasizes probabilistic truth, logic, empirical evidence, and the interplay of diverse, frequently conflicting perspectives. Conversely, some currents of thought within PCT emphasize multiple realities, intuition, personal stories of lived experience, and the exclusion of views that challenge PCT tenets. The increasing adoption of these concepts in academia may limit or even delegitimize quantitative research as currently practiced in social work. We conclude by arguing that social work clients are best served by a scientific discourse that values multiple theoretical frameworks, research methodologies, and scientists operating from different social locations.

Keywords

quantitative methods postmodern/critical theory empiricism research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Babbie

E. R.

(2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage.

Bailey

(2017). Tracking privilege-preserving epistemic pushback in feminist and critical race philosophy classes. Hypatia, 32(4), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12354

Barth

R. P.

Berrick

J. D.

Garcia

A. R.

Drake

Jonson-Reid

Gyourko

J. R.

Greeson

J. K.

(2022). Research to consider while effectively re-designing child welfare services. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(5), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211050000

Bird

(2020). A defense of objectivity in the social sciences, rightly understood. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1785679

Braganza

M. E.

Hodge

D. R.

(in press). Understanding Muslims’ interactions with non-Muslims: Laying the foundation for culturally sensitive social work engagement. Qualitative Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231175161

Brookfield

S. D.

(2022). Repressive tolerance and the “management” of diversity. In Khosrow-Pour

(Ed.), Research anthology on racial equity, identity, and privilege (pp. 1173–1185). IGI Global.

Carbado

D. W.

Roithmayr

(2014). Critical race theory meets social science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030928

Cimen

O. A.

(2014). Discussing ethnomathematics: Is mathematics culturally dependent? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.215

Cintron

S. M.

Wadlington

ChenFeng

(2021). A pathway to equitable math instruction: Dismantling racism in mathematics instruction. https://equitablemath.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/11/1_STRIDE1.pdf

10.

Clark

C. J.

Jussim

Frey

Stevens

S. T.

Al-Gharbi

Aquino

Bailey

J. M.

Barbaro

Baumeister

R. F.

Bleske-Rechek

Buss

Ceci

Giudice

M. D.

Ditto

P. H.

Forgas

J. P.

Geary

D.C.

Geher

Haider

Honeycutt

von Hippel

(2023). Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(48), e2301642120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301642120

11.

Cox

Cleak

Bhathal

Brophy

(2021). Theoretical frameworks in social work education: A scoping review. Social Work Education, 40(1), 18–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1745172

12.

Daftary

(2020). Critical race theory: An effective framework for social work research. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 29(6), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2018.1534223

13.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2023). Critical race theory: An introduction (4th ed.). NYU press.

14.

Dellgran

Höjer

(2001). Mainstream is contextual: Swedish social work research dissertations and theses. Social Work Research, 25(4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/25.4.243

15.

Douglass

(1860). A plea for freedom of speech in Boston. https://frederickdouglasspapersproject.com/s/digitaledition/item/9060

16.

Drake

Hodge

D. R.

(2022). Social work at the crossroads: The empirical highway or the postmodern/critical off-ramp? Research on Social Work Practice, 32(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221077450

17.

Duarte

J. L.

Crawford

J. T.

Stern

Haidt

Jussim

Tetlock

P. E.

(2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, Article e130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000430

18.

Dunbar

A. W.

(2006). Introducing critical race theory to archival discourse: Getting the conversation started. Archival Science, 6, 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9022-6

19.

Fenton

(2022). Enlighten me: Teaching social justice in further and higher education by reclaiming philosophically liberal values–a social work education case study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(8), 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2047619

20.

Fitgerald

(2022). United Nations panel presses Biden officials on racial discrimination in child welfare. https://imprintnews.org/subscriber-content/united-nations-child-welfare-racism/67233

21.

Garcia

N. M.

López

Vélez

V. N.

(Eds.) (2023). QuantCrit: An antiracist quantitative approach to educational inquiry. Routledge.

22.

Garrett

P. M.

(2024). Human rights and social work: Making the case for human rights plus (hr+). The British Journal of Social Work, 54(5), 2107–2123. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae022

23.

Glanzer

P. L.

(2024). Critical religion scholars’ data denial: Their odd efforts to downplay bias against and contributions of Christians. Religion & Education, 51(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2024.2325852

24.

Gribbin

(2019). The scientists: A history of science told through the lives of its greatest inventors. Random House.

25.

Guba

E. G.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Sage.

26.

Gutiérrez

(2017). Why mathematics (education) was late to the backlash party: The need for a revolution. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a347

27.

Hodge

(2020). Spiritual microaggressions: Understanding the subtle messages that foster religious discrimination. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 29(6), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2018.1555501

28.

Hodge

D. R.

(2009). Secular privilege: Deconstructing the invisible rose-tinted sunglasses. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 28(1–2), 8–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426430802643281

29.

Hodge

D. R.

Limb

G. E.

Cross

T. L.

(2009). Moving from colonization toward balance and harmony: A native American perspective on wellness. Social Work, 54(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/54.3.211

30.

Hodge

D. R.

Zidan

Husain

(2024). How to work with Muslim clients in a successful, culturally relevant manner: A national sample of American Muslims share their perspectives. Social Work, 69(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swad048

31.

Honeycutt

Stevens

S. T.

Kaufmann

(2023). The academic mind in 2022: What faculty think about free expression and academic freedom on campus. https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/academic-mind-2022-what-faculty-think-about-free-expression-and-academic-freedom

32.

Hooven

C. K.

(2023). Academic freedom is social justice: Sex, gender, and cancel culture on campus. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02467-5

33.

Howick

Friedemann

Tsakok

Watson

Tsakok

Thomas

Perera

Fleming

Heneghan

(2013). Are treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One, 8(5), Article e62599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062599

34.

Ioannidis

J. P. A.

(2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

35.

Jobling

Shaw

Jang

I. H.

Czarnecki

Ramatowski

(2017). A case study of applied scholarship: The British Journal of Social Work 1971–2013. British Journal of Social Work, 47(8), 2170–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx140

36.

Jones

Drake

Kim

Chen

J. H.

Font

Putnam-Hornstein

Jonson-Reid

(2024). Poverty indicators in the national child abuse and neglect data system child file: Challenges and opportunities. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231179658

37.

Kuhn

(1970). The nature of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago.

38.

Kurten

Brimmel

Klein

Hutter

(2022). Nature and extent of quantitative research in social work journals: A systematic review from 2016 to 2020. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(4), 2008–2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab171

39.

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Ritschel

L. A.

Lynn

S. J.

Cautin

R. L.

Latzman

R. D.

(2014). Why ineffective psychotherapies appear to work: A taxonomy of causes of spurious therapeutic effectiveness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614535216

40.

Losee

(2004). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science (4th ed.). Oxford University.

41.

Lowery

Carvalho

(2022). How critical theory fundamentally challenges traditional inquiry in social science. Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, 17(4), 813–843.

42.

Lukianoff

Haidt

(2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press.

43.

Namuth

Bruton

Wright

Sacco

(in press). Behavioral misconduct as a basis for scientific retractions. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09518-7

44.

National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Code of ethics. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English

45.

O'Connell

(2018). On the human rights question. Human Rights Quarterly, 40(4), 962–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2018.0051

46.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 944–945. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

47.

Ormel

Hollon

S. D.

Kessler

R. C.

Cuijpers

Monroe

S. M.

(2022). More treatment but no less depression: The treatment-prevalence paradox. Clinical Psychology Review, 91, Article 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102111

48.

Pease

Fook

(2016). Transforming social work practice: Postmodern critical perspectives. Routledge.

49.

Pinker

(2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science humanism and progress. Penguin.

50.

Piper

Buch Leander

E.-M.

(2021). Preface to “challenging academia: A critical space for controversial social issues”. In Piper

Buch Leander

E.-M.

(Eds.), Challenging academia: A critical space for controversial social issues (pp. ix–xv). MDPI Books.

51.

Pope

R. A.

(2024). Understanding campus fears after October 7 and how to reduce them. https://cpost.uchicago.edu/publications/cpost_understanding_campus_fears_after_october_7_and_how_to_reduce_them/

52.

Popper

(1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson & Company.

53.

Rubin

(2022). The postmodern/critical perspective: Off-ramp or off the rails? Research on Social Work Practice, 32(6), 622–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221107651

54.

Schippers

M. C.

Ioannidis

J. P.

Luijks

M. W.

(2024). Is society caught up in a death spiral? Modeling societal demise and its reversal. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, Article 1194597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1194597

55.

Sheppard

(2016). The nature and extent of quantitative research in social work: A ten-year study of publications in social work journals. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv084

56.

Slife

B. D.

Gantt

E. E.

(1999). Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(12), 1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1453::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-C

57.

Smith, C. (2014). The sacred project of American sociology. Oxford University Press.

58.

Specht

(1972). The deprofessionalization of social work. Social Work, 17(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/17.2.3

59.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2022). Auguste Comte. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comte/

60.

Stevens

S. T.

(2024). 2025 college free speech rankings: What is the state of free speech on America’s college campuses? https://www.thefire.org/research-learn/2025-college-free-speech-rankings

61.

Submission guidelines. (n.d.). Stigma and health. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/sah

62.

Subotnik

(1998). What's wrong with critical race theory: Reopening the case for middle class values. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7(3), 681–756.

63.

Tascón

Ife

(2008). Human rights and critical whiteness: Whose humanity? International Journal of Human Rights, 12(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980802069609

64.

Thyer

B. A.

(2012). The scientific value of qualitative research for social work. Qualitative Social Work, 11(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011433928

65.

Thyer

B. A.

(2023a). Some philosophical principles for social work research. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 37(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap2024410204

66.

Thyer

B. A.

(2023b). Experimental research designs in social work: Theory and applications. Columbia University Press.

67.

Tushnet

(1993). The critique of rights. SMU Law Review, 47(1), 23–34.

68.

Tzovara

Amarreh

Borghesani

Chakravarty

M. M.

DuPre

Grefkes

Haugg

Jollans

Lee

H. W.

Newman

S. D.

Olsen

R. K.

Ratnanather

J. T.

Rippon

Uddin

L. Q.

Vega

M. L. B.

Veldsman

White

Badhwar

(2021). Embracing diversity and inclusivity in an academic setting: Insights from the organization for human brain mapping. NeuroImage, 229, Article 117742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117742

69.

United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

70.

Vile

J. R.

(2024). Frederick Douglass. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/frederick-douglass

71.

Ward

L. W.

(2022). A critical race theory perspective on assaultive speech in US campus communities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 55(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.2021632

72.

Wendt

D. C.

Gone

J. P.

Nagata

D. K.

(2015). Potentially harmful therapy and multicultural counseling: Bridging two disciplinary discourses. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(3), 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000014548280

73.

White

Persson

(2022). Racial discrimination in child welfare is a human rights violation – Let’s talk about it that way. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/resources/newsletters/childrens-rights/racial-discrimination-child-welfare-human-rights-violation-lets-talk-about-it-way/. Accessed on July 16th, 2024.

74.

Wolf

(1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203

75.

Wolff

R. P.

Moore

Marcuse

(1969). A critique of pure tolerance. Beacon Press.

76.

Zuberi

Bonilla-Silva

(2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield.