Joint interviewing lies somewhere between individual in-depth interviews and focus groups in the panoply of qualitative methodology, yet it has been little explored or described in health research. This article sets out to reflect on the process of choosing to combine joint and individual interviews in the context of a study on the needs of cancer patients and their carers. Questions of intrusion, inclusion, power, and difference caused the researchers to refine their research methods and become more responsive to the preferences of their participants. The article goes on to describe the kind of data generated by joint interviewing and to consider questions of analysis. The author concludes by suggesting that in appropriate circumstances, joint interviewing offers a valuable method of enquiry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arskey, H. (1996). Collecting data through joint interviews. Social Research Update, 15, 1-4.
2.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
Barbour, R. , & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Ltd.
4.
Benjamin, O. (1998). Therapeutic discourse, power and change: Emotion and negotiation in marital conversations. Sociology, 32(4), 771-793.
5.
Cornwell, J. (1984). Hard-earned lives: Accounts of health and illness from East London. London: Tavistock.
6.
Department of Health . (1995). A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. London: Author.
7.
Edwards, D. , & Middleton, D. (1986). Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse. Discourse Processes, 9, 423-459.
8.
Fakhoury, W.K.H. , McCarthy, M., & Addington-Hall, J. M. (1996). Which informal carers are most satisfied with services for dying cancer patients?European Journal of Public Health, 6, 181-187.
9.
Gergen, K. J. , & Gergen, M. M. (1984). The social construction of narrative accounts. In K. J. Gergen & M. M. Gergen (Eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 173-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Gerhardt, U. (1991). Research note: The roles of the wife and marital reality construction in the narrative interview: Conceptual models in qualitative data interpretation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(3), 411-428.
11.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12.
Heaton, J. (1999). The gaze and visibility of the carer: A Foucauldian analysis of the discourse of informal care. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6), 759-777.
13.
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
14.
Kahn, R. L. , & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. C. Brim (Eds.), Life-span, development, and behavior (pp. 254-283). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103-121.
16.
Pahl, J. (1989). Money and marriage. London: Macmillan.
17.
Payne, S. , Smith, S. P., & Dean, S. (1999). Identifying the concerns of informal carers in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 13, 37-44.
18.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Ltd.
19.
Qualitative Solution Research . (1998). NUD*IST qualitative data analysis program Version 4. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
20.
Radley, A. (1988). Prospects of heart surgery: Psychological adjustment to coronary bypass grafting. London: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Radley, A. (Ed.). (1995). Worlds of illness: Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease. London: Routledge.
22.
Radley, A. , & Billig, M. (1996). Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(2), 220-240.
23.
Reay, D. , Bignold, S., Ball, S. J., & Cribb, A. (1998). “He just had a different way of showing it”: Gender dynamics in families coping with childhood cancer. Journal of Gender Studies, 7(1), 39-52.
24.
Seymour, J. , Dix, G., & Eardley, T. (1995). Joint accounts: Methodology and practice in research interviews with couples. York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit.
25.
Shotter, J. (1995). In conversation: Joint action, shared intentionality and ethics. Theory and Psychology, 5(1), 49-73.
26.
Song, M. (1998). Hearing competing voices: Sibling research. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 103-112). London: Sage Ltd.
27.
Stacey, J. (1997). Teratologies: A cultural study of cancer. London: Routledge.
28.
Twigg, J. , & Atkin, K. (1994). Carers perceived: Policy and practice in informal care. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
29.
Vachon, M. (1998). Psychosocial needs of patients and families. Journal of Palliative Care, 14(3), 49-56.
30.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1976). Freudianism: A critical sketch (I. R. Titunik, Trans. and Ed. in collaboration with N. H. Bruss). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1927)
31.
Wilkinson, S. , & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.). (1996). Representing the other. London: Sage Ltd.
32.
Williams, G. (1995). Chronic illness and the pursuit of virtue in everyday life. In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness: Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease (pp. 92-108). London: Routledge.
33.
Zigmond, A. S. , & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandanavia, 67, 361-370.
