Researchers have paid only limited attention to how social structural factors influence the course and content of interviews. Speech, comportment, and values inherent to gender and other social, structural, and contextual factors, such as age, socioeconomic positioning, and ethnicity, all influence the direction, flow, and content of interviews, informing how we might interpret the information collected in the process. Drawing on interviews conducted within an Australian study on chronic illness and disability, the authors explore the performative nature of the interview and how interviewers and interviewees respond to the structural factors shaping the social dynamics of the interview to produce accounts of social life.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
2.
Casper, M. J., & Talley, H. L. (2005). Preface [Special issue]. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(2), 115-120.
3.
Chako, E. (2004). Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork and experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25(1), 51-63.
4.
Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., Laws, C., Mueller-Rockstrohe, B., et al. (2004). The ambivalent practices of reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(3), 360-389.
5.
Davis, J. M. (2000). Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: Research strategies and roles for promoting social change?Disability Studies, 15(2), 191-206.
6.
Denzin, N. K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1(1), 23-46.
7.
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209-230.
8.
Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Franzosi, R. (1998). Narrative analysis—Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 517-554.
10.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
11.
Holmes, J. (1997). Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2(1), 195-223.
12.
Hyden, L. C. (1997). Illness and narrative. Sociology of Health and Illness, 19(1), 48-69.
13.
Kulick, D., & Willson, M. (Eds.). (1995). Taboo: Sex, identity and erotic subjectivity in anthropological fieldwork. London: Routledge.
14.
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H., (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
15.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483-488.
16.
Mantzoukas, S. (2004). Issues of representation within qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 994-1007.
17.
Marcus, G. (1998). What comes (just) after “post”?: The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 383-406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413-431.
19.
McNay, L. (2003). Having it both ways: The incompatibility of narrative identity and communicative ethics in feminist thought. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(6), 1-20.
20.
Oakley, A. (2005). The Ann Oakley reader: Gender, women and social science. Bristol, UK: Policy.
21.
Pini, B. (2005). Interviewing men: Gender and the collection and interpretation of qualitative data. Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 201-216.
22.
Primean, L. A. (2003). Reflection on self in qualitative research: Stories of family. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 9-16.
23.
Raggatt, P. (2000). Mapping the dialogical self: Towards a rationale and method of assessment. European Journal of Personality, 14(1), 65-90.
24.
Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1, 303-323.
25.
Rice, P. L., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
