In this article, the author explores the importance of participatory, respectful, and community-specific approaches to research relationships across differences in social location and experience. Drawing on transcripts from group interviews with 6 young Aboriginal mothers from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside who had experienced substance use during pregnancy and fetal alcohol syndrome/fetal alcohol effects, she discusses three practical strategies used in her doctoral research to address the empirical and methodological implications of this work: the provision of honoraria, collaborating with community leaders in participant recruitment, and the use of shared analysis in group interviews. Shared analysis in the group interviews was integral to supporting policy analysis that challenges the privatization of mothering and substance use. Group interviews can benefit both the participants and the research, support womens' agency, and democratize the research process while mitigating the potential for the misrepresentation and appropriation of women's experiences.
Abma, T.A. (2005). Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1310-1328.
2.
Alcoff, L.M. (1992). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 23, 5-32.
3.
Benoit, C., Carroll, D., & Chandhry, M. (2003). In search of a healing place: Aboriginal women in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. Social Science & Medicine , 56(4), 821-834.
4.
Boyd, S. (1999). Mothers and illicit drugs: Transcending the myths . Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
5.
Brayboy, B.M., & Deyhle, D. (2000). Insider-outsider: Researchers in American Indian communities. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 163-169.
6.
Browne, A.J. (2003). First Nations women and health care services: The sociopolitical context of encounters with nurses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
7.
Browne, A.J., & Fiske, J. (2001). First Nations women's encounters with mainstream health care services. Western Journal of Nursing Research , 23(2), 126-147.
8.
Buck, D.S., Rochon, A., Davidson, H., McCurdy, S., & members of the CHANGE Committee of Health Care for the Homeless (HHH). (2004). Involving homeless persons in the leadership of a health care organization. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 513-525.
9.
Culhane, D. (2004). Domesticated time and restricted space: University and community women in Downtown Eastside Vancouver. BC Studies , 140, 91-107.
10.
Dion Stout, M., Kipling, G.D., & Stout, R. (2001). Aboriginal women's health research: Synthesis project final report. Ottawa, Canada: Centres of Excellence for Women's Health.
11.
Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data?Qualitative Health Research, 15, 832-840.
12.
England, J. (2004). Disciplining subjectivity and space: Representation, film, and its material effects. Antipode, 36(2), 295-322.
13.
Forbat, L., & Henderson, J. (2005). Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants. Qualitative Health Research , 15, 1114-1128.
14.
Frank, A.W. (2005). What is dialogical research and why should we do it?Qualitative Health Research, 15, 964-974.
15.
Greaves, L., Varcoe, C., Poole, N., Morrow, M., Johnson, J., & Pederson, A., et al. (2002). A motherhood issue: Discourses on mothering under duress. Ottawa, Canada: Status of Women Canada.
16.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Harrison, K., & Barlow, J. (1995). Focused group discussion: A “quality” method for health research?Health Psychology Update, 20, 11-13.
18.
Kelly, D.M. (2000). Pregnant with meaning: Teen mothers and the politics of inclusive schooling. New York: Peter Lang.
19.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103-121.
20.
LaRocque, E.D. (1993). The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: The path to healing. Ottawa, Canada: Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples.
21.
Luborsky, M. (1994). The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In. A. Skankar & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. 189-210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Luttrell, W. (2003). Pregnant bodies, fertile minds: Gender, race, and the schooling of pregnant teens. New York: Routledge.
23.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Guiding principles for participatory action research . In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (pp. 25-44). Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
Mihesuah, D.A. (1993). Suggested guidelines for institutions with scholars who conduct research on American Indians. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 17(3), 131-139.
25.
Opie, A. (1992). Qualitative research: Appropriation of the “Other” and empowerment. Feminist Review, 40, 52-69.
26.
Phillips, S.D. (1996). Discourse, identity, and voice: Feminist contributions to policy studies. In L. Dobuzinskis, M. Howlett & D. Laycock (Eds.), Policy studies in Canada: The state of the art (pp. 242-265). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
Pillow, W.S. (2004). Unfit subjects: Educational policy and the teen mother. New York: Routledge Falmer .
28.
Ristock, J.L., & Pennell, J. (1996). Community research as empowerment: Feminist links, postmodern interruptions. Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
29.
Salmon, A. (2004a, April). Dis/abling states, dis/abling citizenship: Young Aboriginal mothers, fetal alcohol syndrome, and nation-building. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
30.
Salmon, A. (2004b). “It takes a community”: Constructing Aboriginal mothers and children with FAS/FAE as objects of moral panic in/through a FAS/FAE prevention policy. Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering, 6(1), 112-123.
31.
Salmon, A. (2005). Beyond guilt, shame, and blame to compassion, respect, and empowerment: Young Aboriginal mothers and the First Nations and Inuit Fetal Alcohol Syndrome/Fetal Alcohol Effects Initiative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
32.
Schneider, B., Scissons, H., Arney, L., Benson, G., Derry, J., Lucas, K., et al. (2004). Communication between people with schizophrenia and their medical professionals: A participatory action research project. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 562-577.
33.
Smith, D.E. (1987). Everyday world as problematic. Toronto, Canada : University of Toronto Press.
34.
Smith, G. (1992). Research issues related to Maori education. In Research Unit for Maori Education (Ed.), The issue of research and Maori (pp. 8-9). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
35.
Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed.
36.
Stacey, J. (1988). Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women's Studies International Forum, 11(1), 21-27.
37.
Swisher, K.G. (1998). Why Indian people should write about Indian education . In D. A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and academics: Research and writing about American Indians (pp. 190-200). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
38.
Tait, C.L. (2002). Fetal alcohol syndrome among Canadian Aboriginal peoples: Review and analysis of the intergenerational links to residential schools. In Aboriginal Healing Foundation (Eds.), Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Doing what works (pp. 168-184). Ottawa, Canada: Author.
39.
Teram, E., Schachter, C.L., & Stalker, C.A. (2005). The case for integrating grounded theory and participatory action research: Empowering clients to inform professional practice. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1129-1140.
40.
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111-125.
