Unlike research on “associative” hard-to-reach populations, such as those at risk of AIDS, which has been subject to extensive methodological scrutiny, few studies have explored strategies for researching nonassociative hard-to-reach populations: those whose members do not normally have contact with other members. This article contributes toward rectifying this imbalance. The literature review includes issues of representativeness, use of membership lists or other centralized sources of information, innovative ways of gaining access to nonassociative population members, and an overview of multiple approaches. The authors then explore strategies adopted by one of them in recent studies of three such populations in the United Kingdom of people with spina bifida and hydrocephalus, advanced Parkinson's disease, and skeletal dysplasia resulting in very short stature. They consider previously unreported problems with using membership lists and discuss strategies for finding population members not in contact with others in the population or membership organizations or professionals.
Andresen, E., Diehr, P., & Luke, D. (2004). Public health surveillance of low frequency populations . Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 25-52.
2.
Barlow, J., Kirkpatrick, S., Stewart-Brown, S., & Davis, H. (2005). Hard to reach or out of reach? Reasons why women refuse to take part in early interventions. Children and Society , 19(3), 199-210.
3.
Benoit, C., Jansson, M., Millar, A., & Phillips, R. (2005). Community-academic research on hard-to-reach populations: Benefits and challenges. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 263-282.
4.
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods Research, 10, 141-163.
5.
Emslie, M., Andrew, J., Entwistle, V., & Walker, K. (2005). Who are your public? A survey comparing the views of a population-based sample with those of a community-based public forum in Scotland. Health and Social Care in the Community, 13(2), 164-169.
6.
Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(4), 790-797.
7.
Fisher, M., Marsh, P., & Phillips, D. (1986). In and out of care: The experiences of children, parents and social workers. London: Batsford.
8.
Hayes, D. (2005). Gaining access to data sources in statutory social work agencies: The long and winding road. British Journal of Social Work, 35(7), 1193-1202.
9.
Heckathorn, D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling ii: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49(1), 11-34.
10.
Lee, R. ( 1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
11.
Lennox, N., Taylor, M., Rey-Conde, T., Bain, C., Purdie, D., & Boyle, F. (2005). Beating the barriers: Recruitment of people with intellectual disability to participate in research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(4), 296-305.
12.
Magnani, R., Sabin, K., Saidel, T., & Heckathorn, D. (2005). Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS, 19, S67-S72.
13.
Martin, J., & Dean, L. (1993). Developing a community sample of gay men for an epidemiological study of aids. In C. Renzetti & R. Lee (Eds.), Researching sensitive topics (pp. 82-100). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Modood, T., & Berthoud, R. (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and disadvantage . London: Policy Studies Institute .
15.
Moyer, M., Coristone, M., Jamault, M., Roberge, G., & O'Hagan, M. (1999). Identifying older people in need using action research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8(1), 103-111.
16.
Neufeld, A., Harrison, M., Hughes, K., Spitzer, D., & Stewart, M. (2001). Participation of immigrant women family caregivers in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research , 23(6), 575-591.
17.
Phillips, D., & Marsh, P. (1984). Doing social work research. Research, Policy and Planning, 2(2), 21-27.
18.
Ross, F., Donovan, S., Brearley, S., Victor, C., Cottee, M., Crowther, P., et al. (2005). Involving older people in research: Methodological issues. Health and Social Care in the Community, 13(3), 268-275.
19.
Salganik, M., & Heckathorn, D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(34), 193-239.
20.
Shaw, I., Bloor, M., Cormack, R., & Williamson, H. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of hard-to-reach populations: The illustration of mark—recapture methods in the study of homelessness. Social Policy and Administration , 30(1), 69-85.
21.
Sudman, S., & Kalton, G. (1985). New developments in the sampling of special populations . American Review of Sociology, 12, 401-429.
22.
Sudman, S., Sirken, M., & Cowan, C. (1988). Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science, 240(240), 991-996.
23.
Teitler, J., Reichman, N., & Sprachman, S. (2003). Costs and benefits of improving response rates for a hard to reach population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(1), 126-138.
24.
Thompson, S. (2002). A constant fight: the need for accessible and co-ordinated services for children and adults with hydrocephalus and/or spina bifida. Peterborough, Canada: Association for Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus.
25.
Thompson, S. (2004). Just invisible. Unpublished research report, Parkinson's Disease Society, London.
26.
Thompson, S., Shakespeare, T., & Wright, M. (2007). A small matter of equality: Living with restricted growth. Yeovil, UK: Restricted Growth Association.
27.
Zokaei, S., & Phillips, D. (2000). Altruism and intergenerational relations among Muslims in Britain. Current Sociology, 48, 45-58.
