We report a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and Internet postings involving people with breast and prostate cancer and discussion of sexual health. Interviewees produce retrospective accounts, their content guided by interviewers’ questions, which might elicit rich biographical and contextual details. Internet exchanges concern participants’ current experiences and contain detailed accounts of disease processes, medical procedures, bodily processes, and, in the case of sexual health, sexual practices. They are used by participants to exchange information and support in a relatively anonymous context. Because of the ease with which large amounts of such archived Internet materials can be accessed and analyzed, this source has considerable potential for direct observation of illness experiences, although some disadvantages also exist. This reverses an earlier situation where observational research was more laborious than qualitative interviews. Observational material for research purposes is, through the Internet, now easy to obtain and produces naturalistic data.
Adair, C.E., Marcoux, G., Williams, A., & Reimer, M. ( 2006). The Internet as a source of data to support the development of a quality-of-life measure for eating disorders. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 538-546.
2.
Andrews, M., Sclater, S.D., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. ( 2004). Narrative research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. ( 1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 304-325.
4.
Baker, P. ( 2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
5.
Baron, N.S. ( 1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication, 18, 133-170.
6.
Bassett, E.H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233-247.
7.
Becker, H.S., & Geer, B. ( 1957). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison . Human Organization, 16, 28-34.
8.
Bury, M. ( 1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4(2), 167-182.
9.
Bylund, C.L. ( 2005). Mothers’ involvement in decision making during the birthing process: A quantitative analysis of women’s online birth stories. Health Communication, 18(1), 23-39.
10.
Cain, M., & Finch, J. ( 1981). Towards a rehabilitation of data. In P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch, & P. Rock (Eds.), Practice and progress: British sociology 1950-1980 (pp. 105-119). London: Allen and Unwin.
11.
Charmaz, K. ( 1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5(2), 168-195.
12.
Couper, M.P., & Stinson, L.L. ( 1999). Completion of self-administered questionnaires in a sex survey. Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 321-330.
13.
Ess, C., & AOIR Working Committee. (2002 ). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
14.
Fleitas, J. ( 1998). Spinning tales from the World Wide Web: Qualitative research in an electronic environment. Qualitative Health Research , 8, 283-292.
15.
Flicker, S., Haans, D., & Skinner, H. ( 2004). Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities . Qualitative Health Research, 14, 124-134.
16.
Fox, N., Ward, K., & O’Rourke, A. (2005). Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the Internet: An "anti-recovery" explanatory model of anorexia. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(7), 944-971.
17.
Gavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. ( 2007). The presentation of "pro-anorexia" in online group interactions . Qualitative Health Research, 18, 325-333.
18.
Goffman, E. ( 1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
19.
Goldfarb, A., & Prince, J. ( 2008). Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy, 20(1), 2-15.
20.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. ( 2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
21.
Harvey, K.J., Brown, B., Crawford, P., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A. ( 2007). "Am I normal?" Teenagers, sexual health and the Internet . Social Science and Medicine, 65, 771-781.
22.
Hine, C. ( 2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
23.
Lee, R.M. ( 1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
24.
Mitchell, K., Wellings, K., Elam, G., Fenton, K., & Johnson, A. ( 2007). How can we facilitate reliable reporting in surveys of sexual behaviour? Evidence from qualitative research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9(5), 519-531.
25.
Orgad, S. ( 2005). Storytelling online: Talking breast cancer on the Internet . New York: Peter Lang.
26.
Rier, D. ( 2007). Internet social support groups as moral agents: The ethical dynamics of HIV+ status disclosure. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29(7), 1043-1058.
27.
Riessman, C.K. ( 1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Robinson, K. ( 2001). Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: A rich source of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 706-714.
29.
Scott, M. ( 2005). Wordsmith Tools 4.0Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version4/
30.
Seale, C. ( 2006). Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups . Health, 10(3), 345-360.
31.
Seale, C. ( 2008). Mapping the field of medical sociology: A comparative analysis of journals. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(5), 677-695.
32.
Seale, C., Boden, S., Lowe, P., Steinberg, D., & Williams, S. ( 2007). Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers. Social Science and Medicine, 65(3), 418-430.
33.
Seale, C., & Charteris-Black, J. (2008a). The interaction of class and gender in illness narratives. Sociology, 42(3), 453-469.
34.
Seale, C., & Charteris-Black, J. (2008b). The interaction of age and gender in illness narratives. Ageing and Society28(7), 1025-1043.
35.
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., Dumelow, C., Locock, J., & Ziebland, S. ( 2008). The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender. Field Methods, 20, 107-128.
36.
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., & Ziebland, S. ( 2006). Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62(10), 2577-2590.
37.
Sharf, B. ( 1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research (pp. 243-256). London: Sage.
38.
Sharf, B.F. ( 1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health, 26(1), 65-84.
39.
Silverman, D. ( 1998). The quality of qualitative health research: The open-ended interview and its alternatives. Social Sciences in Health , 4(2), 104-118.
40.
Sixsmith, J., & Murray, C.D. ( 2001). Ethical issues in the documentary data analysis of Internet posts and archives. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 423-432.
41.
Trow, M. ( 1957). Comment on "Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison." Human Organization, 16, 33-35.
42.
Williams, G. ( 1984). The genesis of chronic illness: Narrative reconstruction . Sociology of Health and Illness, 6(2), 175-200.
43.
Wiszniewski, D., & Coyne, R. ( 2002). Mask and identity: The hermeneutics of self-construction in the information age. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 191-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
