In this article we discuss the findings from a grounded theory study in which we explored how women residing in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside (DTES) minimized some of the physical, psychological, and interpersonal harms associated with crack cocaine use, and identify the social, economic, and political factors that influence safer use. Data were collected over a 3-month period and involved group interviews with 27 women at an agency run by drug users in the DTES. A preliminary theory of safer crack use is discussed, consisting of the central phenomenon of caring for self and others. In addition, four thematic processes are described: (a) establishing a safe physical space, (b) building trusting relationships, (c) learning about safer crack use, and (d) accessing safer equipment. Implications of the findings are discussed in relation to supporting women’s efforts and improving health outcomes.
AlexanderA. (2006). Beyond Vancouver’s “four pillars”: An historical analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), 118-123. doi:10.16/j.drugpo.2005.12.009
BryantT.RaphaelD.RiouxM. (2006). Staying alive: Critical perspectives on health, illness, and health care. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Scholars Press.
6.
BungayV. (2008). Health experiences of women who are street involved and use crack cocaine: Inequity, oppression and relations of power in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. (Doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Retrieved from: https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/931
BungayV.JohnsonJ. L.VarcoeC.BoydS. (2010). Women’s health and use of crack cocaine in context: Structural and “everyday” violence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21(4), 321-329. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.008
9.
ButtersJ.EricksonP. G. (2003). Meeting the health care needs of feet crack cocaine users: A Canadian example. Women & Health, 37(3), 1-17. doi:10.1300/J013v37n03_01
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Community Health and Safety Evaluation Project Team. (2005). Community health and safety evaluation (CHASE) project: Final report. Vancouver, BC, Canada: British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and Providence Health Care. Retrieved from http://chase.hivnet.ubc.ca/project/pubdocs/CHASE_Reports/CHASE_Final_Report.pdf
13.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DuffC. (2009). The drifting city: The role of affect and repair in the development of “enabling environments.”International Journal of Drug Policy, 20(3), 202-208. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.08.002
15.
EricksonP. G.RileyD. M.CheungY. W.O’HareP. A. (1997). Harm reduction: A new direction for drug policies and programs. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
GriffinA. P. (1983). A philosophical analysis of caring in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8(4), 289-295. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1983.tb00328.x
19.
HaydonE.FischerB. (2005). Crack use as a public health problem in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 185-188. Retrieved from http://pubs.cpha.ca/PDF/P26/22306.pdf
JohnsonJ.MalchyL.MulvogueT.MoffatB.BoydS.BuxtonJ.. . . BungayV. (2008). Lessons learned from the SCORE project: A document to support outreach and education related to safer crack use. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Nursing and Health Behaviour Research Unit, University of British Columbia.
22.
KearneyM. H.MurphyS.IrwinK.RosenbaumM. (1995). Salvaging self: A grounded theory of pregnancy on crack cocaine. Nursing Research, 44(4), 208-213.
23.
KearneyM. H.MurphyS.RosenbaumM. (1994a). Leading by losing: Sex and fertility on crack cocaine. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 142-162. doi:10.1177/104973239400400202
24.
KearneyM. H.MurphyS.RosenbaumM. (1994b). Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 38(2), 351-361. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90405-7
25.
KriegerN. (2008). Proximal, distal and the politics of causation: What’s level got do with it?American Journal of Public Health, 98, 221-230. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.111278
26.
LatkinC. A.WilliamsC.WangJ.CurryA. D. (2005). Neighborhood social disorder as a determinant of drug injection behaviors: A structural equation modeling approach. Health Psychology, 24, 96-100. doi:10.1037/0278-6144.24.1.96
27.
LejuezC. W.BornovalovaM. A.ReynoldsE. K.DaughtersS. (2007). Risk factors in the relationship between gender and crack/cocaine. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 15, 165-175. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.165
LeonardL.DeRubeisE.PeludeL.MeddE.BirkettN.SetoJ. (2007). “I inject less as I have easier access to pipes”: Injecting, and sharing of crack-smoking materials, decline as safer crack-smoking resources are distributed. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(3), 255-264. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.02.008
MaasB.FairbairnN.KerrT.LiK.MontanerJ. S. G.WoodE. (2007). Neighborhood and HIV infection among IDU: Place of residence independently predicts HIV infection among a cohort of injection drug users. Health & Place, 13, 432-439. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.005
32.
MalchyL.BungayV.JohnsonJ. L. (2008). Documenting practices and perceptions of “safer” crack use: A Canadian pilot study. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 339-341. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.005
33.
MarlattG. A. (1996). Harm reduction: Come as you are. Addictive Behaviours, 21(6), 779-787. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(96)00042-1
34.
NavarroV.MutanerC. (2004). Political and economic determinants of population health and wellbeing: Controversies and developments. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
35.
RhodesT.SingerM.BourgoisP.FriedmanS. R.StrathdeeS. A. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injection drug users. Social Science and Medicine, 61(5), 1026-1044. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024
36.
RhodesT.WagnerK.StrathdeeS. A.ShannonK.DavidsonP.BourgoisP. (2012). Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In O’CampoP.DunnJ. R. (Eds.), Rethinking social epidemiology towards a science of change (pp. 205-227). New York: Springer.
37.
RoberstonL.CulhaneD. (Eds.). (2005). In plain sight: Reflections on life in Downtown Eastside Vancouver. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Talon Books.
38.
ShannonK.RuschM.ShovellerJ.AlexsonD.GibsonK.TyndallM. (2008). Mapping violence and policing as an environmental-structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 140-147. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.024
39.
SpittalP.CraibK.WoodE.LaliberteN.LiK.TyndallM.SchechterM. T. (2002). Risk factors for elevated HIV incidence rates among female injection drug users in Vancouver. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 166, 894-899. Retrieved from http://www.canadianmedicaljournal.ca/content/166/7/894.full.pdf
TatarskyA. (1998). An integrative approach to harm reduction psychotherapy: A case of problem drinking secondary to depression. In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 4(1), 9-24. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6572(199821)4:1<9::AID-SESS2>3.0.CO;2-I
42.
ThorneS. (2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
43.
Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users. (2008). About VANDU. Retrieved from http://www.vandu.org/
44.
VarcoeV.DickS. (2008). The intersecting risks of violence and HIV for Aboriginal women in a neo-colonial Canadian context. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 4(1), 42-52.
45.
WalterN.BourgoisP.LoinazM. (2004). Masculinity and undocumented labor migration: Injured Latino day laborers in San Francisco. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1159-1168. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.013
