Current trends in health care research point to a shift from disciplinary models to interdisciplinary team-based mixed methods inquiry designs. This keynote address discusses the problems and prospects of creating vibrant mixed methods health care interdisciplinary research teams that can harness their potential synergy that holds the promise of addressing complex health care issues. We examine the range of factors and issues these types of research teams need to consider to facilitate efficient interdisciplinary mixed methods team-based research. It is argued that concepts such as disciplinary comfort zones, a lack of attention to team dynamics, and low levels of reflexivity among interdisciplinary team members can inhibit the effectiveness of a research team. This keynote suggests a set of effective strategies to address the issues that emanate from the new field of research inquiry known as team science as well as lessons learned from tapping into research on organizational dynamics.
CreswellJ. W.ShopeR.Plano ClarkV. L.GreenD. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1–11.
5.
DavisD.LeppoM. (2010). Qualitative plus quantitative data: A mixed methods research design. In PeltonR. P. (Ed.), Making classroom inquiry work: Techniques for effective action research (pp. 67–82). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
6.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 270–283. doi:10.1177/1558689808316807
7.
DyerW. G.DyerJ. H.DyerW. G. (2013). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
GiddingsL. S. (2006). Mixed methods research: Positivism dressed in drag?Journal of Research in Nursing, 11, 195–203. doi:10.1177/1744987106064635
9.
GreeneJ. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969
10.
Hesse-BiberS. (2015). Navigating a turbulent research landscape: Working the boundaries, tensions diversity, and contradictions of multimethod and mixed methods inquiry. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. xxxiii–xxliii). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
HigonettM. R. (1994). Borderwork. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
IrvineR.KerridgeI.McPheeJ.FreemanS. (2002). Interprofessionalism and ethics: Consensus or clash of cultures?Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16, 199–210. doi:10.1080/13561820220146649
13.
KleinJ. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
14.
KleinJ. T.NewellW. H. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In GraffJ. G.RatcliffJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 393–415). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
LarsonE. L.SaimanL.HaasJ.NeumannA.LowyF. D.FatatoB., . . . Members of the Executive Committee Expert Liaisons, Suzanne (2005). Perspectives on antimicrobial resistance: Establishing an interdisciplinary research approach. American Journal of Infection Control, 33, 410–418. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.05.006
16.
LawJ.RuppertE.SavageM. (2011, March). The double social life of methods (Working Paper Series No. 95). Milton Keynes, UK: ESRC Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.
17.
LoebS.PenrodJ.KolanowskiA.HupceyJ.Kopenhaver HaiderK.FickD.. . . YuF. (2008). Creating cross-disciplinary research alliances to advance nursing science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40, 195–210. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00226.x
18.
LopezA.BourgoisP.WengerL.LorvickJ.MartinezA.KraiH. A. (2014). Interdisciplinary mixed methods research with structurally vulnerable populations: Case studies of injection drug users in San Francisco. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24, 101–109. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.004
19.
LowryI. (1992). The strength of loose concepts—Boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: The case of immunology. History of Science, 30, 371–396. doi:10.1177/007327539203000402
20.
LukeD. A.CarothersB. J.DhandA.BellR. A.Moreland-RussellS.SarliC. C.EvanoffB. A. (2015). Breaking down silos: Mapping growth of cross-disciplinary collaboration in a translational science initiative. Clinical and Translational Science, 8, 143–149. doi:10.1111/cts.12248
21.
MasonJ. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6, 9–25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
22.
McNairR. M. (2005). The case for educating health care students in professionalism as the core content of interprofessional education. Medical Education, 39, 456–464. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02116
23.
MillsJ. E.GillJ.SharpR.FranzwayS. (2011). Getting it together: Feminist interdisciplinary research on women and engineering. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 13–19. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2010.09.014
24.
Minh-haT. (1991). When the moon waxes red: Representation, gender and cultural politics. New York: Routledge.
25.
MoodyC. C. M.NelsonA. J. (2013). “A towering virtue of necessity”: Interdisciplinarity and the rise of computer music at Vietnam-era Stanford. Osiris, 28, 254–277. doi:10.1086/671380
26.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1574–1585. doi:10.1177/1049732308325535
27.
O’CathainA.NichollJ.MurphyE. (2009). Structural issues affecting mixed methods studies in health research: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(82), 4–12. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-82
28.
PolancoF.DominguezD.GradyC.StollP.RamosC.MicanJ.Rivera-GobaM. (2011). Conducting HIV research in racial and ethnic minority communities: Building a successful interdisciplinary research team. Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care, 22, 388–396. doi:10.1016/j.jana.2010.10.008
29.
StozakR. (2015). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary multimethod and mixed methods research. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 128–143). New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
VogelA.StipelmanB.HallK.NebelingL.StokolsD.Spruijt-MetzD. (2014). Pioneering the transdisciplinary team science approach: Lessons learned from national cancer institute grantees. Journal of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology, 2(2), 1027.
