Many patients seek and share information online regarding health, especially those diagnosed with chronic disease. The social cognitive theory is used as the theoretical framework for analyzing how members learn within online health communities. This study conducted in-depth interviews with members from online health communities related to arthritis to understand their motivation for participating in the community and how the content exchanged therein is applied to managing their disease. Four themes were identified: processing disease diagnosis, collaborating to solve problem, recognizing personal limitations, and appreciating that health is variable. Topical communication within the online communities was often tailored to members’ situational needs with the ultimate goal being better self-management. The findings demonstrate the online health community is an environment that invites members who share common characteristics to engage with one another and with the shared content for the purpose of learning arthritis self-management strategies. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Backett-MillburnK.WilsonS. (2000). Understanding peer education: Insights from a process evaluation. Health Education Research, 15, 85–96. doi:10.1093/her/15.1.85
3.
BanduraA. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33, 344–358. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344
4.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachaudranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior ( Vol.4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
6.
BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21–41. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00024
7.
BlendonR. J.BensonJ. M.HeroJ. O. (2014). Public trust in physicians—U.S. medicine in international perspective. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 1570–1572. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1407373
8.
BodenheimerT.LorigK.HolmanH.GrumbachK. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 2469–2475. doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469
9.
BullS. S.LevineD. K.BlackS. R.SchmiegeS. J.SantelliJ. (2012). Social media-delivered sexual health intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 467–474. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.022
ChungJ. E. (2013). Social networking in online support groups for health: How online social networking benefits patients. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 639–659. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.757396
12.
CrookB.LoveB. (2016). Examining the light and dark of an online young adult cancer support community. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 938–948. doi:10.1177/1049732316672638
13.
DalyJ.KellehearA.GliksmanM. (1997). The public health researcher: A methodological approach. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
14.
de RidderD.GeenenR.KuijerR.van MiddendorpH. (2008). Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. The Lancet, 372, 246–255. doi:10.1016/SO140-6736(08)61078-8
EsquivelA.Meric-BernstamF.BernstamE. V. (2006). Accuracy and self-correction of information received from an internet breast cancer list. British Medical Journal, 332, 939–942. doi:10.1136/bmj.38753.524201.7C
17.
EysenbachG.PowellJ.EnglesakisM.RizoC.SternA. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 2004, Article 328. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7449/1166?ct
18.
FrostJ. H.MassagliM. P. (2008). Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another’s data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e15. doi:10.2196/jmir.1053
19.
GlanzK.RimerB. K.ViswanathK. (Eds.). (2008). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
GutierrezN.KindrattT. B.PagelsP.FosterB.GimpelN. E. (2014). Health literacy, health information seeking behaviors and internet use among patients attending a private and public clinic in the same geographic area. Journal of Community Health, 39, 83–89. doi:10.1007/s10900-013-9742-5
22.
HartzlerA.PrattW. (2011). Managing the personal side of health: How patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3), e62. doi:10.2196/jmir.1728
23.
HerringS. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In BarabS. A.KlingR.GrayJ. H. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HesseB. W.NelsonD. E.KrepsG. L. (2005). The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: Findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. JAMA Internal Medicine, 165, 2618–2624. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618
25.
HuX.BellR. A.KravitzR. L.OrrangeS. (2012). The prepared patient: Information seeking of online support group members before their medical appointments. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 960–978. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.650828
26.
HuY.SundarS. S. (2010). Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Communication Research, 31, 105–132. doi:10.1177/0093650209351512
JinS. V.PhuaJ.LeeK. M. (2015). Telling stories about breastfeeding through Facebook: The impact of user-generated content (UGC) on pro-breastfeeding attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 6–17. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.046
29.
KellyP. A.HaidetP. (2007). Physician overestimation of patient literacy: A potential source of health care disparities. Patient Education and Counseling, 66, 119–122. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.007
30.
KingodN.ClealB.WahlbergA.HustedG. R. (2016). Online peer-to-peer communities in the daily lives of people with chronic illness: A qualitative systematic review. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 89–99. doi:10.1177/1049732316680203
31.
LaskerJ. N.SogolowE. D.SharimR. R. (2005). The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: Content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailing list. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1), e10. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e10
32.
Macabasco-O’ConnellA.DeWaltD. A.BroucksouK. A.HawkV.BakerD. W.SchillingerD.. . . PignoneM. (2011). Relationship between literacy, knowledge, self-care behaviors, and heart failure-related quality of life. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 979–986. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1668-y
33.
MaherC. A.LewisL. K.KerrarK.MarshallS.De BourdeaudhuijI.VandelanotteC. (2014). Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), e40. doi:10.2196/jmir.2952
34.
MannT.de RidderD.FujitaK. (2013). Self-regulation of health behavior: Social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving. Health Psychology, 32, 487–498. doi:10.1037/a0028533
35.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
OhH. J.LaucknerC.BoehmerJ.Fewins-BlissR.LiK. (2013). Facebooking for health: An examination into the solicitation and effects of health-related social support on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2072–2080. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.017
PulvirentiM.McMillanJ.LawnS. (2014). Empowerment, patient-centered care and self-management. Health Expectations, 17, 303–310. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00757.x
SyredJ.NaidooC.WoodhallS. C.BaraisterP. (2014). Would you tell everyone this? Facebook conversations as health promotion interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(4), e108. doi:10.2196/jmir.3231
42.
TuckettA. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19, 75–87. doi:10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75
43.
TurnerG.ShepherdJ. (1999). A method in search of a theory: Peer education and health promotion. Health Education Research, 14, 235–247. doi:10.1093/her/14.2.235
44.
van der EijkM.FaberM. J.AartsJ. W. M.KremerJ. A. M.MunnekeM.BloemB. R. (2013). Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(6), e115. doi:10.2196/jmir.2476
45.
WicksP.KeiningerD. L.MassagliM. P.de la LogeC.BrownsteinC.IsojarviJ.HeywoodJ. (2012). Perceived benefits of sharing health data between people with epilepsy on an online platform. Epilepsy & Behavior, 23, 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.09.026
46.
WilliamsM. V.DavisT.ParkerR. M.WeissB. D. (2002). The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. Family Medicine, 34, 383–389.
47.
WillisE. (2013). The making of expert patients: The role of online health communities in arthritis self-management. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 1613–1625. doi:10.1177/1359105313496446
48.
WillisE. (2016). Patients’ self-efficacy within online communities: Facilitating chronic disease self-management behaviors. Health Communication, 31, 299–307. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.950019
49.
WillisE.RoyneM. (2016). Chronic disease self-management and online communities. Health Communication, 32, 269–278. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1138278
