The RAI-PC: An assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings

Abstract

Large numbers of persons in most types of healthcare settings have palliative care needs that have considerable impact on their quality of life. Therefore, InterRAI, a multinational consortium of researchers, clinicians, and regulators that uses assessment systems to improve the care of elderly and disabled persons, designed a standardized assessment tool, the Resident Assessment Instrument for Palliative Care (RAI-PC). The RAI-PC can be used for both the design of individual care plans and for case mix and outcomes research. Some elements of this instrument are taken from the resident assessment instrument (RAI) mandated for use in all nursing homes in the United States and widely used throughout the world. The RAI-PC can be used alone or in conjunction with the other assessment tools designed by the InterRAI collaboration: the RAI for homecare (RAI-HC), for acute care (RAI-AC), and for mental health care (RAI-MH).

The objective of this study was to field test and carry out reliability studies on the RAI-PC. After appropriate approvals were obtained, the RAI-PC instrument was field tested on 151 persons in three countries in more than five types of settings. Data obtained from 144 of these individuals were analyzed for reliability. The reliability of the instrument was very good, with about 50 percent of the questions having kappa values of 0.8 or higher, and the average kappa value for each of the eight domains ranging from 0.76 to 0.95. The 54 men and 95 women had a mean age of 79 years. Thirty-four percent of individuals suffered pain daily. Eighty percent tired easily; 52 percent were breathless on exertion; and 19 to 53 percent had one or more other symptoms, including change in sleep pattern, dry mouth, nausea and vomiting, anorexia, breathlessness at rest, constipation, and diarrhea. The number of symptoms an individual reported increased as the estimated time until death declined. The “clinician friendly” RAI-PC can be used in multiple sites of care to facilitate both care planning and case mix and outcomes research.

Keywords

RAI-PC InterRAI palliative care pain

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Donnelly S , Walsh D : The symptoms of advanced cancer. Semin Oncol. 1995; 22(suppl 3): 67-72.

Roy DJ : The times and places of palliative care. J Palliat Care. 2000; 16(suppl): S3-S4.

Bernabei R , Gambassi G , Lapane K , et al. : Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1877-1882.

Landi F , Onder G , Cesari M , et al. : Pain management in frail, community-living elderly patients. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 2721-2724.

Fishman B , Pasternak S , Wallenstein SL , et al. : The Memorial Pain Assessment Card: A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer. 1987; 60: 1151-1158.

Daut RL , Cleeland CS , Flanery RC : Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983; 17: 197-210.

Bruera E , Kuehn N , Miller MJS , et al. : The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991; 7: 6-9.

McCorkle R , Young K : Development of a symptom distress scale. Cancer Nurs. 1978; 5: 373-378.

de Haes JC , van Knippenberg FC , Neijt JP : Measuring psychological and physical distress in cancer patients: Structure and application of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. Br J Cancer. 1990; 62: 1034-1038.

10.

Portenoy RK , Thater HT , Kornblith AB , et al. : The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: An instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics, and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994; 30A: 1326-1336.

11.

Steel K , Jonsson P , DuPasquier J , et al. : Systems of care for frail older persons. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1999; 110: 30-37.

12.

Ribbe M , Ljunggren G , Steel K , et al. : Nursing homes in ten nations: A comparison between countries and settings. Age Ageing. 1997: 26-S2: 3-12.

13.

Steel K , Sherwood S , Ribbe M : The future: A person-specific standardized assessment instrument. Age Ageing. 1997; S2: 83-85.

14.

Fleiss, JL : Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973.

15.

Fox R : From rectangles to triangles. J Roy Soc Med. 2001; 94: 427.

16.

Raphael C , Ahrens J , Fowler N : Financing end-of-life care in the USA. J Roy Soc Med. 2001; 94: 458-461.

17.

Graham C , Bond SS , Gerkovich MM , et al. : Use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain replicability and consistency. Pain. 1980; 8: 377-387.

18.

Melzack R : The short form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987; 30: 191-197.

19.

Braden BJ , Bergstrom N : Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. Res Nurse Health. 1994; 17: 459-470.

20.

Bergen A : Palliative care in long-term care facilities—A comprehensive model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49: 1570-1571.