This project modified the Index for Interdisciplinary Collaboration to create a tool that could measure perceptions of collaboration by all members of the hospice team. Questions on the 42-item instrument were reworded to be more inclusive. This new Modified Index for Interdisciplinary Collaboration (MIIC) showed strong reliability for the total instrument and the original instrument subscales. Further use and testing of this instrument is recommended.
Saunders C. Hospice care. Am J Med. 1978;65: 726-728.
2.
Torrens PR. More than semantics: what is a hospice? In: Torrens P, ed. Hospice Programs and Public Policy. Washington, DC: American Hospital Publishing; 1985: 31-43.
3.
Skobel SW, Cullom BA, Showalter SE. Hospice nursing. When a nurse is not enough: why the hospice interdisciplinary team may be a nurse's best gift. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1997;14:201-204.
4.
Monroe J, DeLoach RJ. Job satisfaction: How do social workers fare with other interdisciplinary team members in hospice settings?Omega: J Death Dying. 2004;49:327-346.
5.
Bruner C. Thinking collaboratively: Ten Questions and Answers To Help Policy Makers Improve Children's Services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium; 1991.
6.
Bronstein LR. A model for interdisciplinary collaboration. Soc Work. 2003;48:297-306.
7.
Bronstein LR. Index of interdisciplinary collaboration. Soc Work Res. 2002;26:113-126.
8.
Parker Oliver D, Bronstein LR, Kurzejeski L. Examining variables related to successful collaboration on the hospice team. Health Soc Work. 2005;30:279-286.
