Multidisciplinary Family Meetings in the ICU Facilitate End-of-Life Decision Making

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a multi-disciplinary family meeting (MDFM) program and the impact of such a program on the end-of-life decision making in the setting of an ICU. Methods: During the study period MDFMs were scheduled for patients requiring mechanical ventilation for 5 or more days. The meeting followed a structured format. The pertinent details of the meeting as well as the treatment goals were recorded. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Thirty-five MDFM’s were held on 24 patients. A meeting could not be arranged for four patients. All meetings addressed patient’s diagnosis, prognosis and goals of care. Fifteen (52%) patients (9 of whom had metastatic malignancy) had life support withdrawal and died a mean of 4.8 + 4.2 days after the first family meeting. In the remaining 9 patients (3 with localized cancer and 6 with non-cancer diagnoses), the plan following the family meeting was to continue supportive care; all of these patients survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions: Proactive MDFM’s improve communication and understanding between patients’ family and the treating team and facilitates end-of-life decision making.

Keywords

palliative care family meeting multidisciplinary ICU critical care end-of-life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angus DC , Barnato AE , Linde-Zwirble W. , et al. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004 ;32:638-643.

Prendergast TJ , Luce JM Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:15-20.

Rubenfeld GD Principles and practice of withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20:435-451.

Cook D. , Rocker G. , Giacomini M. , Sinuff T. , Heyland D. Understanding and changing attitudes towards withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(suppl):S317-S323.

White DB , Braddock CH III , Bereknyei S. , Curtis JR Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:461-467.

Billings JA , Keeley A. , Bauman J. , et al. Merging cultures: palliative care specialists in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S388-S393.

Curtis JR , Engelberg RA Measuring success of interventions to improve the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S341-S347.

Mularski RA , Curtis JR , Billings JA , et al. Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup . Crit Care Med. 2006;34: S404-S411.

Lautrette A. , Ciroldi M. , Ksibi H. , Azoulay E. End-of-life family conferences: rooted in the evidence. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S364-S372.

10.

Nelson JE , Mulkerin CM , Adams LL , Pronovost PJ Improving comfort and communication in the ICU: a practical new tool for palliative care performance measurement and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15: 264-271.

11.

Gries CJ , Curtis JR , Wall RJ , Engelberg RA Family member satisfaction with end-of-life decision making in the ICU. Chest. 2008;133:704-712.

12.

Stapleton RD , Engelberg RA , Wenrich MD , Goss CH , Curtis JR Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1679-1685.

13.

Lecuyer L. , Chevret S. , Thiery G. , Darmon M. , Schlemmer B. , Azoulay E. The ICU trial: a new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:808-814.

14.

Shanawani H. , Wenrich MD , Tonelli MR , Curtis JR Meeting physicians’ responsibilities in providing end-of-life care. Chest. 2008 ;133:775-786.

15.

Ambuel B. , Weissman DE Fast fact and concept #016: conducting a family conference. 2005. www.eperc.mcw.edu/fastfact/ff_016.htm. 2nd ed. Accessed January 18, 2009.

16.

Mosenthal AC , Murphy PA Interdisciplinary model for palliative care in the trauma and surgical intensive care unit: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Demonstration Project for Improving Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S399-S403.

17.

Vincent JL , Moreno R. , Takala J. , et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707-710.

18.

Nelson JE , Angus DC , Weissfeld LA , et al. End-of-life care for the critically ill: a national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2547-2553.

19.

Lautrette A. , Darmon M. , Megarbane B. , et al. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:469-478.

20.

Azoulay E. , Chevret S. , Leleu G. , et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28: 3044-3049.

21.

Hickey M. What are the needs of families of critically ill patients? A review of the literature since 1976. Heart Lung. 1990;19:401-415.

22.

Mosenthal AC , Murphy PA , Barker LK , Lavery R. , Retano A. , Livingston DH Changing the culture around end-of-life care in the trauma intensive care unit. J Trauma. 2008;64:1587-1593.

23.

Lanken PN , Terry PB , Delisser HM , et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical policy statement: palliative care for patients with respiratory diseases and critical illnesses . Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:912-927.