This article presents a comprehensive critical review of the peer-reviewed literature on palliative care and companion animals (CAs), reporting on the evidence and knowledge base regarding CAs and their role for people at end of life. PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for studies pertaining to CAs, end of life, and hospice palliative care. Six studies dealt specifically with empirical research. The remaining literature addressed the topic peripherally or anecdotally. The evidence for efficacy and the knowledge base about the role of CAs at end of life in hospice and palliative care is weak. Further efforts are required to study the conditions under which CAs may be beneficial for patient care, including acceptability to staff, family, and other patients, and with consideration of welfare for the animals involved.
Chur-HansenASternCWinefieldH. Gaps in the evidence about companion animals and human health: some suggestions for progress. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2010;8(3):140–146.
2.
Miller AdamsJM.The role of animals and animal-assisted therapy in stressful life transitions. In: MillerTW, ed. Handbook of Stressful Transitions Across the Lifespan. Springer, online;2010.
3.
BlazinaCBoyrazGShen-MillerD. The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. A Resource for Clinicians and Researchers. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
4.
SkeathPFineAHBergerA. Increasing the effectiveness of palliative care through integrative modalities: conceptualizing the roles of animal companions and animal-assisted interventions. In: FineA, ed. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. London: Elsevier; 2010:301–327.
5.
WellsDL. The effects of animals on human health and well-being. J Soc Issues. 2009;65(3):523–543.
6.
PralongD. Human-animal relations: a bond until the end of life (in French). Infokara: Revue Internationale Francophone de Soins Palliatifs. 2004;19(1):9–12.
7.
HerzogH. Psychology, ethics, and the death of pets [published online December 20, 2012]. Ethics Behav. 2012. doi:10.1080/10508422.2012.757195.
8.
Shir-VerteshD.“Flexible personhood”: loving animals as family members in Israel. Am Anthropol. 2012;114(3):420–432.
9.
PeacockJChur-HansenAWinefieldH. Mental health implications of human attachment to companion animals. J Clin Psychol. 2012;68(3):292–303.
10.
DorfmanJDenduluriSWalsemanKBenjaminBregman. The role of complementary and alternative medicine in end-of-life care. Psychiatr Ann. 2012;42(4):150–155.
11.
GeislerAM.Companion animals in palliative care: Stories from the bedside. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004;21(4):285–288.
12.
DosaD. Making the Rounds with Oscar. London: Headline; 2010.
13.
JosephMBusseyD. Moments with Baxter: Comfort and Love from the World’s Best Therapy Dog. San Diego California: Sage; 2009.
14.
RiveraMA. Hospital Hounds: Animals and Healing and the Borders of Death. New York, NY: Lantern Books; 2001.
15.
KellehearA.Complementary medicine: is it more acceptable in palliative care practice?Med J Aust. 2003;179(suppl 6):S46–S48.
16.
KozakLEKayesLMcCartyR. Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAMS) by Washington State Hospices. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;25(6):463–468.
17.
DemmerC. A survey of complementary therapy services provided by hospices. J Palliat Med. 2004;7(4):510–516.
18.
ChinnerTLDalzielFR. An exploratory study on the viability and efficacy of a pet-facilitated therapy project within a hospice. J Palliat Care. 1991;7(4):13–20.
19.
PhearDN. A study of animal companionship in a day hospice. Palliat Med. 1996;10(4):336–338.
20.
OcklefordEBerrymanJ. Do companion animals have therapeutic value?Eur J Palliat Care. 2001;8:75–78.
21.
MuschelIJ. Pet therapy with terminal cancer patients. Soc Casework. 1984;10(8):451–458.
22.
FriedKP.Pet-facilitated therapy as adjunctive care for home hospice patients: A human service program design to promote quality of life. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering20. 1996;3409.
23.
FeggMJBrandstätterMKramerMHenslerMLorenzlS. Meaning in life in palliative care patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40(4):502–509.
24.
van der SteenJTvan Soest-PoortvlietMCAchterbergWPRibbeMWDe VetHC. Family perceptions of wishes of dementia patients regarding end-of-life care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(2):217–220.
25.
DuffySARonisDFowlerKSchimSMJacksonFC. Differences in veterans’ and nonveterans’ end-of-life preferences: A pilot study. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(5):1099–1105.
26.
DoyleKKukowskiT. Utilization of pets in a hospice program. Health Educ. 1989;20(2):10–11.
27.
BrowderLM. Paws and relax: one hospice’s Pet therapy journey. Home Healthc Nurse. 2009;27(7):443–448.
28.
D’ArcyY. “Paws” to provide comfort, relieve pain. Nursing. 2011;41(4):67–68.
29.
McKeeE. Pets in the ward: till death do us part. Nurs Times. 1989;85(39):57–59.
30.
FitzpatrickSA. Mr Gomez had a different agenda. Nursing. 2005;35(3):56–57.
31.
LanderDAGraham-PoleJR. Love medicine for the dying and their caregivers: the body of evidence. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(2):201–212.
32.
GrewalR. My lucky experience with cats. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(11):1059.
33.
TremayneV. Benefits of budgerigars. Nurs Older People. 2008;20(3):22–23.
34.
Chur-HansenAWinefieldHRBeckwithM. Companion animals for elderly women: a qualitative study of the role of attachment. Qual Res Psychol. 2009;6(4):281–293.
35.
Chur-HansenAWinefieldHBeckwithM. Reasons given by elderly men and women for not owning a pet, and the implications for clinical practice and research. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(8):988–995.
36.
Chur-HansenA. Grief and bereavement issues and the loss of companion animal: people living with a companion animal, owners of livestock, and animal support workers. Clin Psychol. 2010;14(1):14–21.
McCardlePMcCuneSNettingFE. Therapeutic human–animal interaction: an overview. In: McCardleP et al, eds. Animals in Our Lives. Human–Animal Interaction in Family, Community and Therapeutic Settings. Baltimore: Brookes; 2011,107–115.
39.
Chur-HansenAMcArthurMWinefieldHHaniehEHazelS.Animal assisted interventions in children's hospitals: a critical review of the literature. Anthrozoos. In press.
40.
SternCChur-HansenA. Methodological considerations in designing and evaluating animal-assisted interventions. Animals. 2013;3(1):127–141.
