An electronic survey was used to assess the views of a diverse nationwide cohort of health care professionals regarding advance care planning and end-of-life care. A total of 645 responses were received. If diagnosed with a serious incurable illness with limited life expectancy, 97% would want to discuss their prognosis, 74% would refuse cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and 72% favored supportive/comfort care to more aggressive life-prolonging treatments. However, prognosis was thought to be discussed with only 52% of such patients, and just 5% thought doctors were either very or extremely successful at explaining advanced life-sustaining treatments to patients. Greater than 90% believed these discussions should best occur when a patient is thought to have one or more years to live and 80% thought they are best initiated in the outpatient setting.
HagertyRGButowPNEllisPMDimitrySTattersallMH. Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(7):1005–1053.
2.
MarwitSJDatsonSL. Disclosure preferences about terminal illness: an examination of decision-related factors. Death Stud. 2002;26(1):1–20.
3.
BradleyEHHallemeierAGFriedTR. Documentation of discussions about prognosis with terminally ill patients. Am J Med. 2001;111(3):218–223.
4.
LamontEBChristakisNA. Prognostic disclosure to patients with cancer near the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(12):1096–1105.
5.
FriedTRBradleyEHTowleVRAlloreH. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(14):1061–1066.
6.
FieldMJCasselCK. Approaching death: improving care at the end of life. Health Prog. 2011;92(1):25.
7.
GrayBH. England’s approach to improving end-of-life care: a strategy for honoring patients’ choices. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011;15:1–15.
8.
WunschHLinde-ZwirbleWTHarrisonDABarnatoAERowanKMAngusDC. Use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations in England and the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(9):875–880.
9.
AngusDCBarnatoAELinde-ZwirbleWT. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):638–643.
10.
National Center for Health Statistics, Deaths from 39 Selected Causes by Place of Death, Status of Decedent When Death Occurred in Hospital or Medical Center, and Age: United States, 1999-2005 (Hyattsville, Md.: NCHS, 2009), tabulated from the National Vital Statistics System, Mortality. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/gmwk307.htm, Accessed September 12, 2013.
11.
TenoJMGozaloPLBynumJP. Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA. 2013;309(5):470–477.
12.
SingerPARobertsonGRoyDJ. Bioethics for clinicians 6. Advance care planning. CMAJ. 1996;155(12):1689–1692.
13.
DeteringKMHancockADReadeMCSilvesterW. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345.
14.
BriggsL. Shifting the focus of advance care planning: using an in-depth interview to build and strengthen relationships. J Palliat Med. 2004;7(2):341–349.
15.
HammesBJRooneyBL. Death and end-of-life planning in one midwestern community. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(4):383–390.
16.
HickmanSENelsonCAPerrinNAMossAHHammesBJTolleSW. A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(7):1241–1248.
17.
BischoffKESudoreRMiaoYBoscardinWJSmithAK. Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):209–214.
18.
RomerALHammesBJ. Communication, trust, and making choices: advance care planning four years on. J Palliat Med. 2004;7(2):335–340.
19.
AzoulayEPochardFKentish-BarnesN. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(9):987–994.
20.
WrightAAZhangBRayA. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1665–1673.
21.
SilvesterWAdamsMJKirsnerS. Evaluation and report to Australian Government on community implementation of Respecting Patient Choices Program. Jan 2006.
22.
GramelspacherGPZhouXHHannaMPTierneyWM. Preferences of physicians and their patients for end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(6):346–351
23.
BrunettiLLCarperosSDWestlundRE. Physicians’ attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6(4):323–329.
24.
GillickMRHesseKMazzapicaN. Medical technology at the end of life. What would physicians and nurses want for themselves?Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(22):2542–2547.
25.
HillierTAPattersonJRHodgesMORosenbergMR. Physicians as patients. Choices regarding their own resuscitation. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(12):1289–1293.
26.
BlondeauDValoisPKeyserlingkEWHébertMLavoieM. Comparison of patients’ and health care professionals’ attitudes towards advance directives. J Med Ethics. 1998;24(5):328–35.
27.
MebaneEWOmanRFKroonenLTGoldsteinMK. The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(5):579–591.
28.
GalloJJStratonJBKlagMJ. Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(7):961–969.
29.
EysenbachG. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.
30.
RiveraJRVelazquezIAnselmiFJ. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: personal choices of physicians and nurses. Bol Asoc Med P R. 1992;84(4-5):139–143.
31.
The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591–1598.
32.
SchneidermanLJKaplanRMPearlmanRATeetzelH. Do physicians’ own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients’ preferences?J Clin Ethics. 1993;4(1):28–33.
33.
ChristakisNAAschDA. Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(3):367–372.
34.
GlarePVirikKJonesM. A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ. 2003;327(7408):195–198.
35.
MackillopWJQuirtCF. Measuring the accuracy of prognostic judgments in oncology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(1):21–29.
36.
LloberaJEstevaMRifaJ. Terminal cancer: duration and prediction of survival time. Euro J Cancer. 2000;36(16):2036–2043.
37.
ChristakisNALamontEBSmithJLParkesCM. Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. Br Med J. 2000;320(7233):469–473.
38.
KirkwoodMKKostyMPBajorinDFBruinoogeSSGoldsteinMA. Tracking the workforce: the American Society of Clinical Oncology workforce information system. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(1):3–8.
39.
BoukusECassilAO’MalleyAS. A snapshot of U.S. physicians: key findings from the 2008 health tracking physician survey. Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change). 2009;(35):1–11.
