Thirty-day mortality represents a variable that is commonly used to measure the quality of surgical care. The definition of 30-day mortality and the application of a risk adjustment to its measurement may vary among different organizations comparing physician quality. In the midst of this confusion, conflicting interests arise for surgeons who must weigh the potential benefit of surgical interventions to individual patients versus the potential loss of access by future patients should 30-day mortality ratings be adversely affected. Similarly, surgeons may become adversely impacted by the lack of compensation from avoiding “high-risk” cases, but might face a more severe financial impact if they have a higher mortality rating compared to their peers.
FaberMBoschMWollersheimHLeathermanSGrolR. Public reporting in healthcare: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review. Med Care. 2009;47(1):1–8.
2.
KolstadJTChernewME. Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66(1 suppl):28S–52S.
FungCHYee-WeiLMattkeSDambergCShekellePG. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(2):111–124.
5.
WernerRMAschDA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA. 2005;293(1):1239–1244.
FerrisTGTorchianaDF. Public release of clinical outcomes data—online CABG report cards. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1593–1595.
8.
GlanceLGLustickSJHannanEL. The surgical mortality probability model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):696–702.
9.
JhaAKEpsteinAM. The predictive accuracy of the New York State coronary artery bypass surgery report-card system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(3):844–855.
10.
AlpayLVerhoefJXieBTe’eniDZwetsloot-SchonkJH. Current challenge in consumer health informatics: bridging the gap between access to information and information understanding. Biomed Inform Insights. 2009;2(1):1–10.
WernerRM. Will using Medicare data to rate doctors benefit patients?Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):532–533.
13.
JacobsJPMavroudisCJacobsML. What is operative mortality? Defining death in a surgical registry database: a report of the STS congenital database taskforce and the joint EACTS-STS congenital database committee. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1937–1941.
14.
MarshallMNShekellePGDaviesHTSmithPC. Public reporting on quality in the United States and the United Kingdom. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(3):134–148.
15.
DimickJBOsborneNHHallBLKoCYBirkmeyerJD. Risk-adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery how many variables are needed?J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(4):503–508.
GlanceLGLustickSJHannanEL. The surgical mortality probability model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):696–702.
18.
CasselJBJonesABMeierDESmithTJSpragensLHWeissmanD. Hospital mortality rates: how is palliative care taken into account?J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40(6):914–925.
19.
FinlaysonEVBirkmeyerJD. Operative mortality with elective surgery in older adults. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(4):172–177.
20.
KwokACSemelMELipsotzSR. The intensity and variation of surgical care at the end of life: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9800):1408–1413.
21.
FranklinGACannonRWSmithJWHarbrechtBGMillerFBRichardsonJD. Impact of withdrawal of care and futile care on trauma mortality. Surgery. 2011;150(4):854–860.
22.
KetelaarNAFaberMJFlottorpSRyghLHDeaneKHEcclesMP. Public release of performance data in changing the behavior of healthcare consumers, professionals or organizations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD004538.
23.
BakerDWCebulRD. Should consumers trust hospital quality report cards?JAMA. 2002;287(24):3206–3208.
24.
SimmonsJD. Speaking from the heart: end-of-life discussions in the ICU from the surgeon’s perspective. J Surg Educ. 2012;69(3):441–442.
25.
RosenbergALHoferTPStrachanCWattsCMHaywardRA. Accepting critically ill transfer patients: adverse effect on a referral center’s outcome and benchmark measures. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(11):882–890.
