Sequential Assessments of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale Enhance Prognostic Value in Patients With Terminally Ill Cancer Receiving Palliative Care
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2016
Sequential Assessments of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale Enhance Prognostic Value in Patients With Terminally Ill Cancer Receiving Palliative Care
This study aimed to assess the utility of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale assessments on days 1 and 8 of palliative care, as well as scale change between these assessments, as prognostic tools for patients with terminally ill cancer. A total of 2392 patients with terminally ill cancer who received palliative care between January 2006 and December 2011 at a single medical center were analyzed. Our study showed that the ECOG scale is a useful prognostic tool to predict life expectancy in patients with terminally ill cancer. The ECOG scale assessments at different time points under palliative care were independent predictors for overall survival. The combined ECOG scale assessments on days 1 and 8 predicted survival more precisely than using day 1 ECOG scale assessment alone.
OkenMMCreechRHTormeyDC. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–655.
2.
MorVLaliberteLMorrisJNWiemannM. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984;53(9):2002–2007.
3.
BuccheriGFerrignoDTamburiniM. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. Eur J Cancer. 2002;32A(7):1135–1148.
4.
OrrSTAisnerJ. Performance status assessment among oncology patients: a review. Cancer Treat Res. 1986;70(12):1423–1429.
5.
KirkPKirkIKristjansonLJ. What do patients receiving palliative care for cancer and their families want to be told? A Canadian and Australian qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328(7452):1343.
6.
SteinhauserKEChristakisNAClippECMcNeillyMMcIntyreLTulskyJA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476–2482.
7.
RoseJHO’TooleEEDawsonNV. Generalists and oncologists show similar care practices and outcomes for hospitalized late-stage cancer patients. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks for Treatment. Med Care. 2000;38(11):1103–1118.
8.
WeeksJCCookEFO’DaySJ. Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1709–1714.
9.
SchofieldPEButowPNThompsonJFTattersallMHBeeneyLJDunnSM. Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):48–56.
10.
ChristakisNAIwashynaTJ. Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(21):2389–2395.
11.
AndersonFDowningGMHillJCasorsoLLerchN. Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool. J Palliat Care. 1996;12(1):5–11.
12.
MyersJGardinerKHarrisK. Evaluating correlation and interrater reliability for four performance scales in the palliative care setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(2):250–258.
13.
de KockIMirhosseiniMLauF. Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools. J Palliat Care. 2013;29(3):163–169.
14.
TaylorAEOlverINSivanthanTChiMPurnellC. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1999;7(5):332–325.
EvansCMcCarthyM. Prognostic uncertainty in terminal care: can the Karnofsky index help?Lancet. 1985;1(8439):1204–1206.
17.
MaltoniMPirovanoMScarpiE. Prediction of survival of patients terminally ill with cancer. Results of an Italian prospective multicentric study. Cancer. 1995;75(10):2613–2622.
18.
MoritaTTsunodaJInoueSChiharaS. The Palliative Prognostic Index: a scoring system for survival prediction of terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1999;7(3):128–133.
19.
JangRWCaraiscosVBSwamiN. Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(5):e335–e341.
20.
DowningGMLesperanceMLauFYangJ. Survival implications of sudden functional decline as a sentinel event using the palliative performance scale. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(5):549–557.
21.
SeowHBarberaLDudgeonD. The association of the palliative performance scale and hazard of death in an ambulatory cancer population. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(2):156–162.
22.
ChanEYWuHYChanYH. Revisiting the Palliative Performance Scale: change in scores during disease trajectory predicts survival. Palliat Med. 2013;27(4):367–374.
23.
AraiYOkajimaYKotaniKTambaK. Prognostication based on the change in the palliative prognostic index for patients with terminal cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(4):742–747. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.
24.
KaoCYHungYSWangHM. Combination of initial palliative prognostic index and score change provides a better prognostic value for terminally ill cancer patients: a six year observational cohort study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48(5):804–814. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.246.
25.
HungCYWangHMKaoCY. Magnitude of score change for the palliative prognostic index for survival prediction in patients with poor prognostic terminal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(10):2725–2731.
