Symptom and Quality of Life (QOL) data are important patient reported outcomes. Early identification of these is critical for appropriate interventions. Data collection may be helped by modern information technology.
Aim:
This study examined symptoms and QOL in people with solid tumors at their first visit to a medical oncologist. We also evaluated the clinical utility of tablet computers (TC) to collect this data.
Methods:
This was a prospective study of 105 consecutive patients in the cancer outpatient clinic of a tertiary level academic medical center. Symptom and QOL data was collected by TC with wireless database upload.
Results:
One-third participants had moderate to severe pain; almost half clinically significant pain that interfered with daily activities. Tiredness, anxiety, and drowsiness were common (prevalence - 79%, 63% and 50% respectively). One-third of those who had items identified from the Edmonton System Assessment System also volunteered other symptoms, mostly gastrointestinal problems. Many of those affected also reported impaired Global Wellbeing and low Overall QOL. There was a 98% completion rate, which took on average ten minutes. Direct observation and informal feedback from patients and physicians regarding the acceptability of TC in this setting was uniformly positive.
Conclusions:
Amongst people with newly diagnosed solid tumors clinically important psychological and physical symptoms, QOL problems and difficulties with daily activities were commonly present in the 24-hour period and in the week before a first Medical Oncology visit. Symptom and QOL data collection by TC in busy outpatient clinics showed good clinical utility.
HomsiJWalshDRiveraN. Symptom evaluation in palliative medicine: patient report vs systematic assessment. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(5):444–453.
2.
KirkovaJWalshDRusselMHauserKLasheenW. Symptom assessment in palliative medicine: complexities and challenges. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010;27(1):75–83.
3.
TsaiJSWuCHChiuTYHuWYChenCY. Symptom patterns of advanced cancer patients in a palliative care unit. Palliat Med. 2006;20(6):617–622.
4.
TeunissenSCWeskerWKruitwagenCde HaesHCVoestEEde GraeffA. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(1):94–104.
5.
JohnsenATPetersenMAPedersenLGroenvoldM. Symptoms and problems in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2009;23(6):491–501.
6.
ReinkeLFFeemsterLCBackhusLMGylys-ColwellIAuDH. Assessment and management of symptoms for outpatients newly diagnosed with lung cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016;33(2):178–183.
7.
CarlsonLEWallerAGroffSLZhongLBultzBD. Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(4):617–625.
8.
TemelJSGreerJAMuzikanskyA. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):733–742.
9.
ThomasBCWallerAMalhiRL. A longitudinal analysis of symptom clusters in cancer patients and their sociodemographic predictors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(3):566–578.
10.
KimYYenIHRabowMW. Comparing symptom burden in patients with metastatic and nonmetastatic cancer. J Palliat Med. 2016;19(1):64–68.
11.
AbernethyAPWheelerJLZafarSY. Management of gastrointestinal symptoms in advanced cancer patients: the rapid learning cancer clinic model. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010;4(1):36–45.
12.
BaschEAbernethyAPMullinsCD. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4249–4255.
13.
SnyderCFWuAWMillerRSJensenREBantugETWolffAC. The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care. Cancer J. 2011;17(4):211–218.
14.
(IOM) IoM. Digital Data Improvement Priorities for Continuous Learning in Health and Health Care: Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press (US); 2012.
15.
CharlesD GMFurukawaMF. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008-2013. In: Technology. OotNCfHI, editor. Washington, DC: ONC Data Brief; May2014.
16.
AbernethyAPAhmadAZafarSYWheelerJLReeseJBLyerlyHK. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care. 2010;48(6 suppl):S32–S38.
17.
HjermstadMJLieHCCaraceniA. Computer-based symptom assessment is feasible in patients with advanced cancer: results from an international multicenter study, the EPCRC-CSA. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(5):639–654.
18.
Finney RuttenLJVieuxSNSt SauverJL. Patient perceptions of electronic medical records use and ratings of care quality. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2014;5:17–23.
19.
HolznerBGiesingerJMPinggeraJ. The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:126.
20.
AktasAHullihenBShrotriyaSThomasSWalshDEstfanB. Connected health: cancer symptom and quality-of-life assessment using a tablet computer: a pilot study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015;32(2):189–197.
21.
UrbaniakGCPlousS. Research Randomizer (Version 4.0) [Computer software]. 2013 [Accessed 10 March 2013]. Web site. http://www.randomizer.org/.
22.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeRPayneJGonzalezNCondeJG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
23.
GroenvoldMPetersenMAAaronsonNK. The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: a shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(1):55–64.
24.
AaronsonNKAhmedzaiSBergmanB. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–376.
25.
KrebsEECareyTSWeinbergerM. Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(10):1453–1458.
26.
SelbyDCascellaAGardinerK. A single set of numerical cutpoints to define moderate and severe symptoms for the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(2):241–249.
27.
U.S. Department of Education NCfES. The Condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014–083), Educational Attainment. 2014 [Accessed 14th July 2014]. Web site. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=27.
28.
MarkTLJohnsonGFortnerBRyanK. The benefits and challenges of using computer-assisted symptom assessments in oncology clinics: results of a qualitative assessment. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008;7(5):401–406.
29.
VelikovaGBoothLSmithAB. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(4):714–724.
30.
HilariusDLKloegPHGundyCMAaronsonNK. Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: a community hospital-based intervention study. Cancer. 2008;113(3):628–637.
31.
TakeuchiEEKedingAAwadN. Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: a longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(21):2910–2917.
32.
LiaoYCShunSCLiaoWYYuCJYangPCLaiYH. Quality of life and related factors in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer: a longitudinal study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(2):E44–E55.
33.
PutsMTMonetteJGirreV. Quality of life during the course of cancer treatment in older newly diagnosed patients. Results of a prospective pilot study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(4):916–923.
34.
EsbensenBAOsterlindKRoerOHallbergIR. Quality of life of elderly persons with newly diagnosed cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2004;13(5):443–453.
35.
DeshieldsTLPotterPOlsenSLiuJ. The persistence of symptom burden: symptom experience and quality of life of cancer patients across one year. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(4):1089–1096.
36.
StromgrenASNiemannCUTangeUB. Quality of life and symptoms in patients with malignant diseases admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(7):1843–1849.
37.
BerryDLHongFHalpennyB. Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(3):199–205.
38.
ThekkumpurathPVenkateswaranCKumarMNewshamABennettMI. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(4):597–605.
39.
HollenPJGrallaRJStewartJAMeharchandJMWierzbickiRLeighlN. Can a computerized format replace a paper form in PRO and HRQL evaluation? Psychometric testing of the computer-assisted LCSS instrument (eLCSS-QL). Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):165–172.
40.
DueckACMendozaTRMitchellSA. Validity and reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(8):1051–1059.
41.
FyllingenEHOldervollLMLogeJH. Computer-based assessment of symptoms and mobility in palliative care: feasibility and challenges. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(6):827–836.
42.
Shelby-JamesTMAbernethyAPMcAlindonACurrowDC. Handheld computers for data entry: high tech has its problems too. Trials. 2007;8:5.
43.
SmithSKRoweKAbernethyAP. Use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement system to improve distress management in oncology. Palliat Support Care. 2014;12(1):69–73.
44.
MovsasBHuntDWatkins-BrunerD. Can electronic web-based technology improve quality of life data collection? Analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0828. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4(3):187–191.
45.
KamalAHSwetzKMDySTienAYTemelJSAbernethyAP. Integrating technology into palliative care research. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012;6(4):525–532.
46.
AbernethyAPWheelerJLBullJ. Development of a health information technology-based data system in community-based hospice and palliative care. Am J Prevent Med. 2011;40(5 suppl 2):S217–S224.
