Increased attention is being paid to “dementia directives,” advance directives tailored to persons with dementia that outline what treatments an individual with dementia might wish to receive or forgo should they lose capacity. Particular focus has been placed on the request to have assisted oral feedings withheld, the so-called Stopping of Eating and Drinking by Advance Directive (SED by AD), the purpose of which is to hasten death. This article reviews the available literature regarding the practice of SED by AD and explores the clinical and ethical aspects as they present at the bedside. Our review aims to show that practical, clinically applicable ways to approach such requests must be developed in order to balance the fundamental principles at play.
QuillTEGanziniLTruogRDPopeTM. Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking among patients with serious advanced illness: clinical, ethical and legal aspects. JAMA. 2018;178(1):123–127.
8.
LachmanVD. Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: an ethical alternative to physician-assisted suicide. Med Surg Nurs J. 2015;24(1):56–59.
9.
SteinbockBMenzelPT. Advance directive for refusing life-sustaining treatment in dementia. Hasting Cent Rep. 2018;48(5):75–79.
10.
PopeTM. Whether, when, and how to honor advance VSED requests for end-stage dementia patients. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(1):90–92.
11.
MenzelPT. Justifying a surrogate’s request to forego oral feeding. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(1):92–94.
12.
DresserR. Toward a humane death with dementia. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014;44(3):38–40.
13.
Power of Attorney for Health Care for an Adult With Any Form of Dementia: Form. Nev. Rev. Stat. §162A.870 (eff. Oct 1, 2019).
14.
DarbyRRDickersonBC. Dementia, decision making, and capacity. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017;25(6):270–278.
15.
MitchellSLTenoJMKielyDK, et al.The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(16):1529–1538.
16.
BlandfordG. Eating disorders. In: TallisRCFillitM ed. Brocklehurst’s Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 6th ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone (Elsevier Science Limited); 2003:1381–1390.
17.
AhronheimJCMorrisonRSMorrisJBaskinSAMeierDE. Palliative care in advanced dementia: a randomized controlled trial and descriptive analysis. J Palliat Med. 2000;3(3):265–273.
18.
SchwarzJK. Death by voluntary dehydration: suicide or the right to refuse a life-prolonging measure?Widener Law Rev. 2011;17(351):351–361.
19.
RhodenNK. The limits of legal objectivity. N C L Rev. 1990;68(5):845–865.
20.
DresserR. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers Law Rev1994;46(2):609–719.
21.
KimSYH. Improving medical decisions for incapacitated persons: does focusing on “accurate predictions” lead to an inaccurate picture?J Med Philos. 2014;39(2):187–195.
22.
CantorNL.Twenty-five years after Quinlan: a review of the jurisprudence of death and dying. J Law Med Ethics. 2001;29(2):182–196.
23.
TorkeAMAlexanderGCLantosJ.Substituted judgement: the limitations in autonomy in surrogate decision making. J of Gen Int Med. 2008;23(9):1514–1517.
SiegerCArnoldJAhronheimJC. Refusing artificial nutrition and hydration: does statutory law send the wrong message?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(3):544–550.
29.
Power of attorney for adult with intellectual disability: Form. Nev Rev Stat. §162A.865.
30.
PalecekEJTenoJMCasarettDJHansonLCRhodesRLMitchellSL. Comfort feeding only: a proposal to bring clarity to decision-making regarding difficulty with eating for persons with advanced dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(3):580–584.
