Comparison of Web-Based and Paper Advance Directives: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background:

Digital tools to document care preferences in serious illnesses are increasingly common, but their impact is unknown. We developed a web-based advance directive (AD) featuring (1) modular content eliciting detailed care preferences, (2) the ability to electronically transmit ADs to the electronic health record (EHR), and (3) use of nudges to promote document transmission and sharing.

Objective:

To compare a web-based, EHR-transmissible AD to a paper AD.

Methods:

Patients with gastrointestinal and lung malignancies were randomized to the web or paper AD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with newly documented advance care plans in the EHR at 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes assessed through an e-mail survey included the change in satisfaction with end-of-life plans, AD acceptability, and self-reported sharing with a surrogate.

Results:

Ninety-one participants were enrolled: 46 randomly allocated to the web AD and 45 to paper. Thirteen patients assigned to web AD (28%) had new documentation versus 7 (16%) assigned to paper (P = .14). Adjusted for demographic factors and primary diagnosis, the odds ratio of new documentation with web AD was 3.7 (95% CI: 0.8-17.0, P = .10). Satisfaction with advance care planning and AD acceptability were high in both groups and not significantly different. Among patients completing web ADs, 79% reported sharing plans with their caregivers, compared with 65% of those completing paper ADs (P = .40).

Conclusion:

Web-based ADs hold promise for promoting documentation and sharing of preferences, but larger studies are needed to quantify effects on these intermediate end points and on patient-centered outcomes.

Keywords

advance directives websites web-based advance care planning electronic health record digital health living will

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Teno

Freedman

Kasper

Gozalo

Mor

. Is care for the dying improving in the United States? J Palliat Med. 2015;18(8):662–626.

Khandelwal

Curtis

Freedman

, et al.

How often is end-of-life care in the United States inconsistent with patients’ goals of care?

J Palliat Med. 2017;20(12):1400–1404.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician fee schedule final rule with comment period. Published 2015. Accessed July 2, 2018. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeeSched/PFS-Federal-Regulation-Notices-Items/CMS-1631-FC.html

Halpern

. Toward evidence-based end-of-life care. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(21):2001–2003.

Scott

Small

Troxel

Cooney

, et al. Default options in advance directives for seriously ill patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e201742.

Yadav

Gabler

Cooney

, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(7):1244–1251.

Wilson

Newman

Tapper

, et al.

Multiple locations of advance care planning documentation in an electronic health record: are they easy to find?

J Palliat Med. 2013;16(9):1089–1094.

Ditto

Danks

Smucker

, et al. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):421–430.

Portz

Ford

Bekelman

, et al. “We’re taking something so human and trying to digitize”: provider recommendations for mHealth in palliative care. J Palliat Med [Internet]. 2019;23(2):240–247. Accessed February 1, 2020. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jpm.2019.0216

10.

Teno

Gruneir

Schwartz

Nanda

Wetle

. Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: a national study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):189–194.

11.

Lum

Brungardt

Jordan

, et al. Design and implementation of patient portal–based advance care planning tools. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;57(1):112–117.e2.

12.

Fine

Yang

Spivey

Boardman

Courtney

. Early experience with digital advance care planning and directives, a novel consumer-driven program. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2016;29(3):263–267.

13.

Rolnick

Asch

Halpern

. Delegalizing advance directives—facilitating advance care planning. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22):2105–2107.

14.

Tunzi

. Advance care directives: realities and challenges in Central California. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(3):239–248.

15.

Chiarchiaro

Ernecoff

Buddadhumaruk

Rak

Arnold

White

. Key stakeholders’ perspectives on a web-based advance care planning tool for advanced lung disease. J Crit Care. 2015;30(6):1418. e7-1418.e12.

16.

Sudore

Boscardin

Feuz

McMahan

Katen

Barnes

. Effect of the prepare website vs an easy-to-read advance directive on advance care planning documentation and engagement among veterans: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(8):1102–1109.

17.

Halpern

Loewenstein

Volpp

, et al. Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care. Health Aff Proj Hope. 2013;32(2):408–417.

18.

Rolnick

Shea

Hart

Halpern

. Patients’ perspectives on approaches to facilitate completion of advance directives. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019;36(6):526–532.

19.

Josephs

Bayard

Gabler

Cooney

Halpern

. Active choice intervention increases advance directive completion: a randomized trial. MDM Policy Pract. 2018;3(1):238146831775312.

20.

Heyland

Cook

Rocker

, et al. The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire. Palliat Med. 2010;24(7):682–695.

21.

Heyland

Frank

Tranmer

, et al. Satisfaction with end-of-life care: a longitudinal study of patients and their family caregivers in the last months of life. J Palliat Care. 2009;25(4):245–256.

22.

Sudore

Landefeld

Barnes

, et al. An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):165–195.

23.

Harre

Lee

Pollock

. Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. JNCI. 1988;80(15):1198–2202.

24.

Hauck

Anderson

Marcus

. Should we adjust for covariates in nonlinear regression analyses of randomized trials? Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(3):249–256.

25.

Vogel

Petzel

Cragg

, et al. Development and pilot of an advance care planning website for women with ovarian cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(2):430–436.

26.

Periyakoil

Neri

Kraemer

. A randomized controlled trial comparing the letter project advance directive to traditional advance directive. J Palliat Med. 2017;20(9):954–965.

27.

Courtright

Madden

Gabler

, et al. A randomized trial of expanding choice sets to motivate advance directive completion. Med Decis Mak. 2017;37(5):544–554.

28.

Halpern

Loewenstein

Volpp

, et al. Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):408–417.

29.

Tarver

Menser

Hesse

, et al. Growth dynamics of patient-provider internet communication: trend analysis using the health information national trends survey (2003 to 2013). J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e109.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB