The Premise and Development of CHECK IN—Check-In for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information to Enhance Palliative Care Discussions for Patients With Limited English Proficiency
Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online June, 2021
The Premise and Development of CHECK IN—Check-In for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information to Enhance Palliative Care Discussions for Patients With Limited English Proficiency
Communication regarding serious illness is challenging in most circumstances. Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) have unique language and cultural needs that often require collaboration with a trained medical interpreter, especially when the clinical encounter involves serious illness decision making or elucidation of patient goals, preferences, and values. Although there is mounting evidence to support interpreter/clinician huddles before a serious illness communication encounter, no current initiatives exist to operationalize this evidence. We are currently in the process of developing, evaluating, and implementing a formal interpreter/clinician huddle process to promote high quality care for patients with LEP. Our huddle guide, called the Check-In for Exchange of Clinical and Key Information (CHECK-IN), is designed to facilitate collaboration between an interpreter and clinician during a serious illness encounter by prompting exchange of relevant sociocultural and clinical information between clinicians and interpreters.
American Community Survey, Detailed Languages Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over. 2009-2013. Accessed 5 January, 2019. https://www.census.gov/data.html
3.
FloresGAbreuMOlivarMAKastnerB. Access barriers to health care for Latino children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(11):1119–1125.
4.
FloresG. Language barriers to health care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):229–231.
5.
SchenkerYKarterAJSchillingerD, et al.The impact of limited English proficiency and physician language concordance on reports of clinical interactions among patients with diabetes: the DISTANCE study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(2):222–228.
6.
WoloshinSSchwartzLMKatzSJWelchHG. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services?J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(8):472–477.
7.
FergusonWJCandibLM. Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship. FMCH Publications and Presentations; 2002:61.
8.
ShiLLebrunLATsaiJ. The influence of English proficiency on access to care. Ethn Health. 2009;14(6):625–642.
9.
OromH. Nativity and perceived healthcare quality. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18(3):636–643.
10.
John-BaptisteANaglieGTomlinsonG, et al.The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(3):221–228.
11.
KarlinerLSKimSEMeltzerDOAuerbachAD. Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(5):276–282.
12.
HampersLCChaSGutglassDJBinnsHJKrugSE. Language barriers and resource utilization in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1253–1256.
13.
HarmsenJABernsenRMBruijnzeelsMAMeeuwesenL. Patients’ evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers?Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(1):155–162.
14.
ChengEMChenACunninghamW. Primary language and receipt of recommended health care among Hispanics in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(suppl 2):283–288.
15.
PeriyakoilVSNeriEKraemerH. Patient-reported barriers to high-quality, end-of-life care: a multiethnic, multilingual, mixed-methods study. J Palliat Med. 2016;19(4):373–379.
MayedaDPWardKT. Methods for overcoming barriers in palliative care for ethnic/racial minorities: a systematic review. Palliat Support Care. 2019;17(6):697–706.
18.
PerryLMWashLEHorswellR, et al.Racial disparities in end-of-life care between black and white adults with metastatic cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020.
19.
PartainDKSandersJJLeiterRECareyECStrandJJ. End-of-life care for seriously ill international patients at a global destination medical center. Paper presented at: Mayo Clinic Proceedings; 2018.
20.
BarwiseAJaramilloCNovotnyP, et al.Differences in code status and end-of-life decision making in patients with limited English proficiency in the intensive care unit. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2018;93(9):1271–1281.
21.
YarnellCJFuLManuelD, et al.Association between immigrant status and end-of-life care in Ontario, Canada. JAMA. 2017.
22.
BriereR.Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC. 2001:3.
23.
RichardsonW. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press; 2001.
24.
WolfeA. Institute of medicine report: crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century. Policy Politics Nurs Pract. 2001;2(3):233–235.
25.
BarwiseAKNyquistCASuarezNRE, et al.End-of-life decision-making for ICU patients with limited English proficiency: a qualitative study of healthcare team insights. Crit Care Med. 2019.
26.
BetancourtJR RMGreenAR, et al.Improving Patient Safety Systems for Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Guide for Hospitals. AHRQ, ed. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0041. AHRQ Publication No. 12-0041. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
27.
EpsteinRStreetR. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. National Cancer Institute; 2007. NIH Publication; 2007.
28.
BarwiseABalls-BerryJSoleimaniJ, et al.Interventions for end of life decision making for patients with limited English proficiency. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;22(4):860–872.
29.
SudoreRLLandefeldCSBarnesDE, et al.An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1-3):165–195.
30.
SudoreRLSchillingerDKatenMT, et al.Engaging diverse English- and Spanish-speaking older adults in advance care planning: the PREPARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1616–1625.
31.
Nedjat-HaiemFRCarrionIVGonzalezK, et al.Implementing an advance care planning intervention in community settings with older Latinos: a feasibility study. J Palliat Med. 2017;20(9):984–993.
32.
FischerSMCervantesLFinkRMKutnerJS. Apoyo con Carino: a pilot randomized controlled trial of a patient navigator intervention to improve palliative care outcomes for Latinos with serious illness. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(4):657–665.
33.
FischerSMKlineDMMinS-JOkuyama-SasakiSFinkRM. Effect of Apoyo con Cariño (Support With Caring) trial of a patient navigator intervention to improve palliative care outcomes for Latino adults with advanced cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(12):1736–1741.
34.
DeteringKSuttonEFraserS, et al.Feasibility and acceptability of advance care planning in elderly Italian and Greek speaking patients as compared to English-speaking patients: an Australian cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e008800.
35.
VolandesAEArizaMAbboEDPaasche-OrlowM. Overcoming educational barriers for advance care planning in Latinos with video images. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(5):700–706.
36.
HeymanJCGutheilIA. Older Latinos’ attitudes toward and comfort with end-of-life planning. Health Soc Work. 2010;35(1):17–26.
37.
FagerlinASchneiderCE. Enough: the failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34(2):30–42.
38.
PerkinsHS. Controlling death: the false promise of advance directives. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(1):51–57.
39.
TeitelbaumJCartwright-SmithLRosenbaumS.Translating rights into access: language access and the Affordable Care Act. Am J Law Med. 2012;38(2-3):348–373.
40.
ChenAHYoudelmanMKBrooksJ. The legal framework for language access in healthcare settings: title VI and beyond. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(suppl 2):362–367.
41.
CooperLAHillMNPoweNR. Designing and evaluating interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(6):477–486.
42.
KarlinerLSJacobsEAChenAHMuthaS. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727–754.
43.
FloresG. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev. 2005;62(3):255–299.
44.
KarlinerLSPérez-StableEJGregorichSE. Convenient access to professional interpreters in the hospital decreases readmission rates and estimated hospital expenditures for patients with limited English proficiency. Med Care. 2017;55(3):199.
45.
WuMSRawalS. “It’s the difference between life and death”: The views of professional medical interpreters on their role in the delivery of safe care to patients with limited English proficiency. PloS One. 2017;12(10):e0185659.
46.
BagchiADDaleSVerbitsky-SavitzNAndrecheckSZavotskyKEisensteinR. Examining effectiveness of medical interpreters in emergency departments for Spanish-speaking patients with limited English proficiency: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(3):248–256. e244.
47.
NorrisWMWenrichMDNielsenELTreecePDJacksonJCCurtisJR. Communication about end-of-life care between language-discordant patients and clinicians: insights from medical interpreters. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(5):1016–1024.
48.
SilvaMDGenoffMZaballaA, et al.Interpreting at the end of life: a systematic review of the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to cancer patients with limited English proficiency. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(3):569–580.
49.
SilvaMDTsaiSSobotaRMAbelBTReidMCAdelmanRD. Missed opportunities when communicating with limited English-proficient patients during end-of-life conversations: insights from Spanish-speaking and Chinese-speaking medical interpreters. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;59(3):694–701.
50.
ButowPNLobbEJeffordM, et al.A bridge between cultures: interpreters’ perspectives of consultations with migrant oncology patients. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(2):235–244.
51.
Dysart-GaleD. Clinicians and medical interpreters: negotiating culturally appropriate care for patients with limited English ability. Fam Community Health. 2007;30(3):237–246.
52.
LeeJSPérez-StableEJGregorichSE, et al.Increased access to professional interpreters in the hospital improves informed consent for patients with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(8):863–870.
53.
JuckettGUngerK. Appropriate use of medical interpreters. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(7):476–480.
54.
WalterJKSchallTEDeWittAG, et al.Interprofessional team member communication patterns, teamwork, and collaboration in pre–family meeting huddles in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019;58(1):11–18.
55.
MichalsenALongACGanzFD, et al.Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU: a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(9):1258–1266.
56.
BoehmerKRHargravesIGAllenSVMatthewsMRMaherCMontoriVM. Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: development of the ICAN discussion aid. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):514.
57.
BoehmerKRDoblerCCThotaA, et al.Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e029105.
58.
SchenkerYSmithAKArnoldRMFernandezA. “Her husband doesn’t speak much English”: conducting a family meeting with an interpreter. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(4):494–498.
