Background: Family members often take the place of decision-making for elderly individuals. Previous studies showed that family members could not predict elderly individuals’ thoughts about end-of-life care. Objectives: The aims are to understand the differences and perspectives between elderly individuals and surrogates regarding end-of-life care. Design: A mixed methods study comprising a cross-sectional survey and field notes analysis. Setting: Two geriatric wards in a veterans hospital located in northern Taiwan. Subjects: Fifty-five pairs of elderly individuals and their surrogates. Measurements: Life support preferences questionnaire and field notes. Results: The quantitative data showed that the elderly individuals and their surrogates had proper consistency in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and surgery. However, their consistency was poor in antibiotics and nasogastric tube feeding. Four themes were identified in qualitative data: recognizing old age, struggling with hope and peace, worries and concerns, and control of life. Recognizing old age for both elderly individuals and their surrogates was critical. Elderly individuals and their surrogates may seek a ray of hope among aggressive treatments and struggle with hope and peace. A lot of worries and concerns were mentioned, including contextual concerns. Elderly individuals need to depend on their ability to control their life. Conclusions: The study highlights elderly individuals’ and their surrogates’ considerations for antibiotics and nasogastric tube feeding. Furthermore, elderly individuals expressed that it is different for making decisions for themselves or others; thus, future studies can further explore whether elderly individuals allow their surrogates leeway from their wishes.
SuhlJSimonsPReedyTGarrickT. Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(1):90-96.
2.
TorkeAMAlexanderGCLantosJ. Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1514-1517.
3.
SaulerMSiegelMD. The past, present, and future of advance directives as a guide to end-of-life decision making. Chest. 2012;141(1):9-10.
4.
LöckenhoffCE. Aging and decision-making: a conceptual framework for future research - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2018;64(2):140-148.
5.
CoppolinoMAckersonL. Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?Chest. 2001;119(2):603-612.
6.
ShalowitzDIGarrett-MayerEWendlerD. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-497.
7.
SharmaRKHughesMTNolanMT, et al.Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(8):881-886.
8.
BatteuxEFergusonETunneyRJ. A mixed methods investigation of end-of-life surrogate decisions among older adults. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):44.
9.
ComerARHickmanSESlavenJE, et al.Assessment of discordance between surrogate care goals and medical treatment provided to older adults with serious illness. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e205179.
10.
ChuangI-FShyuY-ILWengL-CHuangH-L. Consistency in end-of-life care preferences between hospitalized elderly patients and their primary family caregivers. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:2377-2387.
11.
KhizarBHarwoodRH. Making difficult decisions with older patients on medical wards. Clin Med. 2017;17(4):353-356.
12.
LingD-LYuH-JGuoH-L. Truth-telling, decision-making, and ethics among cancer patients in nursing practice in China. Nurs Ethics. 2019;26(4):1000-1008.
13.
NakagawaTChoJGondoY, et al.Subjective well-being in centenarians: a comparison of Japan and the United States. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(10):1313-1320.
14.
RothbaumFMorelliGPottMLiu-ConstantY. Immigrant-Chinese and Euro-American parents’ physical closeness with young children: themes of family relatedness. J Fam Psychol. 2000;14(3):334-348.
15.
PunJKHCheungKMChowJCHChanWL. Chinese perspective on end-of-life communication: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020. [Online ahead of print]. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002166
16.
KeL-SHuW-YChenC-YLiuC-YChiuT-Y. A quasi-experimental evaluation of advance care planning improves consistency between elderly individuals and their surrogates regarding end-of-life care preferences: development and application of a decision aid with cartoon pictures. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(4):815-825.
17.
KeL-SHuW-YChenM-JChengH-CLinL-H. Advance care planning to improve end-of-life decision-making consistency between older people and their surrogates in Taiwan. J Palliat Med. 2020;23(3):325-336.
18.
CoppolaKMBookwalaJDittoPHLockhartLKDanksJHSmuckerWD. Elderly adults’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments: the role of impairment, prognosis, and pain. Death Stud. 1999;23(7):617-634.
19.
WinterLParksSM. The reluctance to burden others as a value in end-of-life decision making: a source of inaccuracy in substituted judgment. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):179-188.
20.
TuranBGoldsteinMKGarberAMCarstensenLL. Knowing loved ones’ end-of-life health care wishes: attachment security predicts caregivers’ accuracy. Health Psychol. 2011;30(6):814-818.
21.
SuenL-JWLeeH-HMorrisDL. Life-sustaining treatment: a comparison of the preferences of Taiwanese older adults and their family caregiver. J Nurs Res. 2013;21(4):261-269.
22.
PhillippiJLauderdaleJ. A guide to field notes for qualitative research: context and conversation. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(3):381-388.
23.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDEMoulesNJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847.
24.
TaylorPJohnsonMJDowdingDW. Clinical decision-making at the end of life: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020;10(3):e26.
25.
PiersRDvan EechoudIJVan CampS, et al.Advance care planning in terminally ill and frail older persons. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(3):323-329.
26.
BullockK. The influence of culture on end-of-life decision making. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2011;7(1):83-98.
27.
BullockKChristGBlackerS. Promoting advance directives among African Americans: a faith-based model. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(1):183-195.
28.
ChanHYPangSM. Readiness of Chinese frail old age home residents towards end-of-life care decision making. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9-10):1454-1461.
29.
FriedTRBradleyEH. What matters to seriously ill older persons making end-of-life treatment decisions?: a qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6(2):237-244.
30.
KoENelson-BeckerHParkYShinM. End-of-life decision making in older Korean adults: concerns, preferences, and expectations. Educ Gerontol. 2013;39(2):71-81.
31.
RodriguezKLYoungAJ. Elderly veterans’ beliefs concerning life-sustaining treatment and the control of their end-of-life health and health care. J Aging Health. 2006;18(5):686-706.
32.
RosenfeldKEWengerNSKagawa-SingerM. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):620-625.
33.
KeL-SHuangXHuW-YO’ConnorMLeeS. Experiences and perspectives of older people regarding advance care planning: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Palliat Med. 2017;31(5):394-405.
34.
MalhotraCChanADoYKMalhotraRGohC. Good end-of-life care: perspectives of middle-aged and older Singaporeans. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012;44(2):252-263.
35.
SchubartJRLeviBHDellasegaCWhiteheadMGreenMJ. Factors that affect decisions to receive (or not receive) life-sustaining treatment in advance care planning. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014;52(2):38-44.
36.
LeiboviciLPaulM. Ethical dilemmas in antibiotic treatment: focus on the elderly. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(1):27-29.
37.
DuncanIMaxwellTLHuynhNToddM. Polypharmacy, medication possession, and deprescribing of potentially non-beneficial drugs in hospice patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020;37(12):1076-1085.
38.
MacedoFNunesCLadeiraK, et al.Antimicrobial therapy in palliative care: an overview. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(5):1361-1367.
39.
EnckRE. Antibiotic use in end-of-life care: a soft line?Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010;27(4):237-238.
40.
PengoVZurloAVociA, et al.Advanced dementia: opinions of physicians and nurses about antibiotic therapy, artificial hydration and nutrition in patients with different life expectancies. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(3):487-493.
41.
DurandMForestierEGras AygonC, et al.Determinants of doctors’ antibiotic prescriptions for patients over 75 years old in the terminal stage of palliative care. Infect Dis Now. 2021;51(4):340-345.
42.
Barrado-MartínYHatterLMooreKJ, et al.Nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia near the end of life: a qualitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(2):664-680.
43.
ChiuT-YHuW-YChuangR-BChenC-Y. Nutrition and hydration for terminal cancer patients in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer. 2002;10(8):630-636.
44.
BravoGTrottierLArcandM, et al.Promoting advance care planning among community-based older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(11):1785-1795.
45.
KellyBRidAWendlerD. Systematic review: individuals’ goals for surrogate decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(5):884-895.
