Introduction: Successful shared decision-making for critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients requires bidirectional communication. Through observation of ICU conversations, our study aimed to identify communication skill deficiencies in providers who care for patients in the ICU. Methods: This was an observational prospective study performed in a single urban academic medical center (671 beds) from June 2021 through August 2021. Twenty-three providers were recruited from medical and surgical ICU services (56 beds). Thirty-nine surrogate decision makers were identified. Provider skills were assessed using a customized observational tool that examined nonverbal communication, verbal communication, opening the discussion, gathering information, understanding the family’s perspective, sharing information, reaching agreements on problems and plans, and providing closure. Results: Thirty-nine conversations were observed for six attending physicians, four fellow physicians, eight resident physicians, two nurse practitioners, and three physician assistants during the coronavirus 19 (COVID19) pandemic. A dedicated critical care provider engaged in 19 observed conversations; 20 discussions occurred with individuals rotating/consulting in the ICU. Communication skill did not depend on experience or area of expertise. Less than half of conversations achieved bidirectional communication proficiency. Scheduled conversations (n = 14) had significantly higher average communication scores than unscheduled encounters (n = 25). Conclusions: Superficial unidirectional communication with decision makers was commonly observed. Providers were less proficient at advanced communication skills needed for shared decision-making. We recommend that providers have more scheduled conversations, which were more productive in achieving bidirectional communication. A targeted simulation curriculum addressing these areas may improve patient, decision maker, and provider satisfaction, while promoting patient-centered care.
van MolMMBoeterTGVerharenLKompanjeEJBakkerJNijkampMD. Patient- and family-centred care in the intensive care unit: A challenge in the daily practice of healthcare professionals. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(19-20):3212-3223.
2.
TymitzKLidorALidorA. The institute of medicine: Crossing the quality chasm. In: DSTichanskyJMortonDBJones, eds. The SAGES Manual of Quality, Outcomes and Patient Safety. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2012:379-386.
3.
HoffmannTCLégaréFSimmonsMB, et al.Shared decision making: What do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):35-39.
4.
BoissyAWindoverAKBokarD, et al.Communication skills training for physicians improves patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(7):755-761.
5.
NelsonJEPuntilloKAPronovostPJ, et al.In their own words: Patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):808–818.
6.
BigluMNateqFGhojazadehMAsgharzadehA. Communication skills of physicians and patients’ satisfaction. Mater SocioMed. 2017;29(3):192-195.
7.
AzoulayEChevretSLeleuG, et al.Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3044-3049.
8.
ScheunemannLPErnecoffNCBuddadhumarukP, et al.Clinician-family communication about patients’ values and preferences in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):676-684.
9.
MakoulG. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: The kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390-393.
10.
EdgarLRobertsSHolmboeE. Milestones 2.0: A step forward. J Grad Med Educ. 2018;10(3):367-369.
11.
DavidsonJEPowersKHedayatKM, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American college of critical care medicine task force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605-622.
12.
Family presence: visitation in the adult ICU. Crit Care Nurse. 2012;32(4):76-78.
13.
MackLCvengrosJ. Communication matrix. Communications Course. Rush Medical College; 2020.
14.
HarrisGHBaldisseriMRReynoldsBROrsinoASSackrowitzRBishopJM. Design for implementation of a system-level ICU pandemic surge staffing plan. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(6):e0136.
15.
AslaksonRACurtisJRNelsonJE. The changing role of palliative care in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(11):2418-2428.
16.
MohanDAlexanderSCGarriguesSKArnoldRMBarnatoAE. Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(8):949-956.
17.
KarlinerLSJacobsEAChenAHMuthaS. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited english proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(2):727-754.
18.
Al ShamsiHAlmutairiAGAl MashrafiSAl KalbaniT. Implications of language barriers for healthcare: A systematic review. Oman Med J. 2020;35(2):e122.
19.
JohnsonEMHamiltonMFWatsonRS, et al.An intensive, simulation-based communication course for pediatric critical care medicine fellows. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(8):e348-e355.
20.
McCallisterJWGustinJLWells-Di GregorioSWayDPMastronardeJG. Communication skills training curriculum for pulmonary and critical care fellows. Annals ATS. 2015;12(4):520-525.
21.
HarmsCYoungJRAmslerFZettlerCScheideggerDKindlerCH. Improving anaesthetists’ communication skills. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(2):166-172.
22.
LambaSTyrieLSBryczkowskiSNagurkaR. Teaching surgery residents the skills to communicate difficult news to patient and family members: A literature review. J Palliat Med. 2016;19(1):101-107.
23.
EgglySChidiacEJZestosM. A workshop in physician-patient communication for anesthesiology trainees. J Educ Perioper Med. 2003;5(2):E028.
24.
BrouwersMRasenbergEvan WeelCLaanRvan Weel-BaumgartenE. Assessing patient-centred communication in teaching: A systematic review of instruments. Med Educ. 2017;51(11):1103-1117.
