Advance care planning (ACP) is a nuanced process where patients identify their goals and consider their preferences for medical care over time. Recent systematic reviews have shown mixed findings about the association of ACP with the provision of goal-concordant care, completion of advance directives, and health care utilization. Despite a lack of consistent benefit, patients and clinicians value ACP and policy makers at the state and federal level have been moving ACP policies forward. All fifty states have policies regarding advance directives, and federal policy has had important implications on promoting awareness of ACP and its corresponding legal documents such as advance directives. However, challenges to effectively incentivize and facilitate the delivery of high-quality ACP exist. This paper provides an overview of key federal policy aspects and barriers that affect ACP use including: limitations of Medicare ACP billing codes, disparities in telemedicine access, difficulties with interoperability of advance directives, and underutilization of ACP as a mandatory measure in federal programs. This paper highlights key opportunities to improve federal ACP policy. Because ACP is an essential part of high-quality care and is deeply embedded in state and federal policies, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about these issues so they may more effectively engage in ACP policy.
MorrisonRSMeierDEArnoldRM. What's wrong with advance care planning?JAMA. 2021;326(16):1575-1576.
2.
SmithAK. Should we still believe in advance care planning?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(5):1358-1360.
3.
KlinglerCin der SchmittenJMarckmannG. Does facilitated Advance Care Planning reduce the costs of care near the end of life? Systematic review and ethical considerations. Palliat Med. 2016;30(5):423-433.
4.
McMahanRDTellezISudoreRL. Deconstructing the complexities of advance care planning outcomes: what do we know and where do we go? A scoping review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(1):234-244.
5.
SteinhauserKEClippECMcNeillyMChristakisNAMcIntyreLMTulskyJA. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(10):825-832.
6.
SudoreRLLumHDYouJJ, et al.Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;53(5):821-832.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Overview of the List of Measures under Consideration. Washington, DC: Department of Health & Human Services; 2022.
9.
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Request for information on person-centered care planning for multiple chronic conditions. Department of health & human services. Fed Regist. 2022;87:56950-56953.
10.
Raise Family Caregiving Advisory Council. Recognize, Assist, Include, Support & Engage (RAISE) Family Caregivers Act Initial Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living; 2021.
11.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. The MITRE Corporation. Streamlining Transitions of Care and Care Coordination through FHIR. http://pacioproject.org. Accessed May 18, 2022.
Office of the Assistant Secretary For Planning and Evaluation. Advance Care Planning Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries and Practitioners: Final Report; 2020.
14.
Office of the Inspector General. Medicare Providers Did Not Always Comply with Federal Requirements when Billing for Advance Care Planning. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2022.
United States General Accounting Office. Patient Self-Determination Act Providers Offer Information on Advance Directives but Effectiveness Uncertain; 1995.
17.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Frequently Asked Questions about Billing the Physician Fee Schedule for Advance Care Planning Services; 2016.
18.
WeissmanJSGazarianPReichA, et al.Recent trends in the use of Medicare advance care planning codes. J Palliat Med. 2020;23(12):1568-1570.
19.
BarnatoAEO'MalleyAJSkinnerJSBirkmeyerJD. Use of advance care planning billing codes for hospitalized older adults at high risk of dying: a national observational study. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(4):229-231.
20.
AshanaDCChenXAgiroA, et al.Advance care planning claims and health care utilization among seriously ill patients near the end of life. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914471.
21.
LadinKBronziOCGazarianPK, et al.Understanding the use of Medicare procedure codes for advance care planning: a national qualitative study. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022;41(1):112-119.
22.
BoettcherITurnerRBriggsL. Telephonic advance care planning facilitated by health plan case managers. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(3):795-800.
23.
FreelandDGWuDS. Disease-specific advance care planning interventions for older adults. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2019;8(1):12-20.
24.
SinghSHerrmannKCyriacksWYoungwerthJBickelKELumHD. Increasing medical power of attorney completion for hospitalized patients during the covid pandemic: a social work led quality improvement intervention. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2021;61(3):579-584.e1.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule and other revisions to Part B for CY 2016. In: Services. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. 2015.
27.
PellandKMorphisBHarrisDGardnerR. Assessment of first-year use of medicare's advance care planning billing codes. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):827-829.
28.
PalmerMKJacobsonMEnguidanosS. Advance care planning for Medicare beneficiaries increased substantially, but prevalence remained low. Health Aff. 2021;40(4):613-621.
29.
GrantMFreelandDJonesLCSinghS. The Equity Issue with Advance Care Planning Cost Sharing. Health Affairs Forefront; 2022.
30.
SeecofOMAllanoffMLiantonioJParksS. Lessons learned from a pilot project on telemedicine advance care planning in an urban geriatric primary care Office. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022;39(6):701-704.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. National Survey Trends in Telehealth Use in 2021: Disparities in Utilization and Audio vs. Video Services; 2022.
33.
HorrocksDKinzerDAfzalSAlpernJSharfsteinJM. The adequacy of individual hospital data to identify high utilizers and assess community health. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):856-858.
34.
DuncanJTaillacPNangleB, et al.Electronic end-of-life care registry: the Utah ePOLST initiative. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013;2013:345-353.
35.
BatesDWSamalL. Interoperability: what is it, how can we make it work for clinicians, and how should we measure it in the future?Health Serv Res. 2018;53(5):3270-3277.
36.
BondWFKimMFranciskovichCM, et al.Advance care planning in an accountable care organization is associated with increased advanced directive documentation and decreased costs. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(4):489-502.
