Barriers Associated With Missed Palliative Care Telehealth Visits

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth in palliative care. While this technology showed efficiencies in healthcare delivery, it also unmasked inequalities affecting the socially disadvantaged. Objective: To identify factors associated with missed telehealth visits. Methods: We reviewed telehealth visits between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021 at a palliative care clinic. Disease-related and demographic information were recorded, including residency in community outreach zones (COZ)—zip code clusters known for healthcare underutilization. We categorized patients with at least one missed visit as “any miss” (AM), and those with at least three scheduled visits and missed at least 50% as “pattern miss” (PM). Results: Of 1225 scheduled telehealth (i.e., audiovisual) visits, there were 802 completed, 52 missed initial and 371 missed follow-up encounters. Among 505 unique patients, 363 (72%) were receiving cancer treatment, 170 (34%) had multiple insurance, 87 (17%) lived in COZ, 101 (20%) were AM, and 27 (5%) were PM. Patients in COZ had significantly higher risk of PM vs those outside (OR = 2.56, 95% CI: 1.06-5.78, P = .03). Patients with multiple insurance had significantly higher risk of PM vs those with single or no coverage (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 1.40-6.93, P = .006). Patients on treatment had significantly higher risk of AM vs those not in treatment (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-3.06, P = .04). Conclusion: We identified living in areas with healthcare underutilization, active cancer treatment, and multiple insurance coverage as barriers to telehealth visits. Measures are necessary to attenuate disparities in accessing palliative care via telehealth.

Keywords

palliative care telehealth telemedicine virtual visit

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Frequently Asked Questions . The office of the national coordinator for health information technology. 2023. https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-telehealth-how-telehealth-different-telemedicine#text=While/telemedicine/refers/specifically/to/in/addition/to/clinical/services. Accessed 4 April, 2023.

Telehealth . Medicaid.gov. 2023. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/telehealth/index.html. Accessed 9 April, 2023.

Hennemann-Krause

Lopes

Araújo

Petersen

Nunes

. The assessment of telemedicine to support outpatient palliative care in advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(4):1025-1030.

Bonsignore

Bloom

Steinhauser

, et al. Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth program in a rural palliative care population: TapCloud for palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(1):7-14.

Miller

Baird

Lira

, et al. The use of telemedicine for home-based palliative care for children with serious illness: a scoping review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;62(3):619-636.e6.

Parker Oliver

Demiris

Wittenberg-Lyles

, et al. Caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings via videophone technology: a pilot study to improve pain management. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010;27(7):465-473.

Baldwin

McAuley

Van Nostrand

. Organizational factors associated with the use of telehospice. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(2):90-93.

NHPCO Palliative Care Needs Survey Results Summary . National hospice and palliative care organization. 2020. https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/Palliative_Care_Needs_Survey_2020.pdf. Accessed 4 April, 2023.

Medicare and Medicaid Programs . Federal register. 2023. https://www.federal.register.gov/d/2022-23873. Accessed 4 April, 2023.

10.

Worster

Swartz

. Telemedicine and palliative care: an increasing role in supportive oncology. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017;19(6):37.

11.

Read Paul

Salmon

Sinnarajah

Spice

. Web-based videoconferencing for rural palliative care consultation with elderly patients at home. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(9):3321-3330.

12.

Oliver

Demiris

Wittenberg-Lyles

, et al. A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice. Telemed J e Health. 2012;18(1):38-47.

13.

Roberts

Mehrotra

. Assessment of disparities in digital access among Medicare beneficiaries and implications for telemedicine. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1386-1389.

14.

Frydman

Berkalieva

Liu

, et al.

Telemedicine utilization in the ambulatory palliative care setting: are there disparities?

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;S0885-3924(21):00564-00569.

15.

Braswell

Wally

Kempton

, et al. Age and socioeconomic status affect access to telemedicine at an urban level 1 trauma center. OTA Int. 2021;4(4):e155.

16.

Shao

McLeod

Gleason

, et al. Inequity in telemedicine use among patients with cancer in the deep south during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncol. 2022;27(7):555-564.

17.

Cleveland Clinic . Cleveland clinic and its community partners to help provide affordable broadband to Cleveland neighborhood. 2023. https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2020/12/03/Cleveland-clinic-and-its-community-partners-to-help-provide-affordable-broadband-to-cleveland-neighborhood. Accessed 2 February, 2023.

18.

Benda

Veinot

Sieck

Ancker

. Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health! Am J Publ Health. 2020;110(8):1123-1125.

19.

Guzek

Fadel

Golomb

. A pilot study of reasons and risk factors for “no-shows” in a pediatric neurology clinic. J Child Neurol. 2015;30(10):1295-1299.

20.

Curry

Tybor

Jonas

, et al. An evaluation of risk factors for patient “no shows” at an urban joint arthroplasty clinic. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(22):e1006-e1013.

21.

Lagman

RLL

Samala

LeGrand

, et al. “If you call them, they will come”: a telephone call reminder to decrease the no-show rate in an outpatient palliative medicine clinic. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021;38(5):448-451.