Ethics and hospice physicians

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gest T , Burke S : Is there a right to die? Now the Supreme Court may decide if care can be halted. US News & World Report, December 11, 1989:35-37

Governor has difficult time with bill on feeding tubes. St. Petersburg Times, June 10, 1989:4B-4B

Cruzan v.Director, Missouri Dept of Health. 11OS,Ct. 2841, 1990

1989 Current Opinions:The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the AMA. Chicago, AMA, 1989

Munsat TL . Stuart WH , Crawford RE : Guidelines on the vegetative state: Commentary on the Amer Acad of Neurol statement. Neurology 1989;39:123-124

American College of Physicians : American College of Physicians ethics manual , Part 1: History; the patient;other physicians. Annals of mt Med 1989;111:245-242. Part 2: The physician and society; research; life-sustaining treatment; other issues. Ann Mt Med 1989;111:327-335

The Appleton Consensus : Suggested international guidelines for decisions to forego medical treatment. The J of Danish Med Assoc 1989;151:700-706

Ethical guidelines for the development of patient-related policies and procedures for hospice programs. Pub by National Hospice Organization, Arlington, VA, 1989

Magno J : The hospice concept of care: Facing the 1990's. Keynote address given at annual conference of the association for death education and counseling, April 15, 1989, Baltimore, MD

10.

C Stratton Hill : Narcotics and cancer pain control. Ca-A Cancer J for Clin 1988;38:322-326

11.

Cleeland C : Barriers to the management of cancer pain. Oncology, special supplement, April 1987:19-26

12.

Foley KM : Controversies in cancer pain. Medical perspectives. Cancer 1989;63:2257-2265

13.

Wanzer SH . Federman DD , Adelstein SJ , et al: The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. N Eng J Med 1989;320:844-849

14.

Blum RH . Simpson PK , Blum DS . Factors limiting the use of indicated opioid analgesics for cancer pain. The Am J of Hosp& Palliative Care 1990;7(5):31-35

15.

Taylor H : (Letter) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. NEJM 1990;322:1891-1892

16.

Annas GJ , Arnold B , Aroskar M , et al: Bioethicists’ on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision. NEJM 1991;323:686-687

17.

Annas GJ : Nancy Cruzan and the right to die. NEJM 1990;323:670-673

18.

Broch, DW , Wartman S : When competent patients make irrational choices. NEJM 1990;322:1595-1599

19.

Miles SH , Singer PA , Siegler M :Conflicts between patients’ wishes to forego treatment and the policies of health care facilities. NEJM 1989;321:48-50

20.

Paris JJ , Crone RK , Reardon F : Physicians’ refusal of requested treatment. Thecase of Baby L. NEJM 1990;322:1012-1016

21.

Life, death and the treatment of dying patients. A pastoral statement of the Catholic Bishops of Florida, April 27, 1989

22.

de Wachter MAM : Active euthanasia in the Netherlands. JAMA 1989;262:3316-3319

23.

Orentlicher D : Ethics and Health Policy Counsel. Physician participation in assisted suicide. From the Office of the General Counsel. JAMA 1989;262:1844-1845

24.

Gianelli DM : Would aiding in dying make MD shired killers? Amer Med News, February 16, 1990:3,44-44

25.

Meyer H : “Elegant way” of dying? Euthanasia debate flares in Europe; issue draws growing attention in US. Amer Med News,Aug. 4, 1989:7-7

26.

Ventafridda V . Ripamonti C . DeConno F , Tamburini M : Symptom prevalence and control during cancer patients’ last days of life. J of Palliative Care 1990;6(3):7-11

27.

Singer PA , Siegler M : Euthanasia— a critique. NEJM 1990;322:1881-1883

28.

Roy DS . Euthanasia—taking a stand. (ed) J of Paffiative Care 1990;6:3-5

29.

Wilkinson J . The ethics of euthanasia. Palliative Medicine 1990;4:81-86

30.

Angell M : Euthanasia. NEJM 1988;319: 1348-1350

31.

Johnson K : Webster v Reproductive Health Services. The AMA position. JAMA 1989; 262: 1522-1522

32.

Annas GJ : The Supreme Court, privacy, abortion. NEJM 1989;32l:1200-1203

33.

Annas GJ , Glantz LH , Manner WK : The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. JAMA 1990;263:858-861

34.

Truth-telling in the physician-patient relationship: In Reiser SJ , Dyck AJ , Curran WJ (eds.). Ethics in Medicine. Historical perspectives and contemporary concerns. Cambridge, MLT Press, 1977:201-202

35.

Veatch RM : A theory of medical ethics. New York, Basic Books, Inc., 1981:216-226

36.

Oken D : What to tell cancer patients: A study of medical attitudes. JAMA 1961;175:1120-1128

37.

Novack DH , Plummer R , Smith RL , et al: Changes in physicians’ attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA 1979;241:897-900

38.

Holland JC (ed): Now we tell but how well? J of Clin Onc 1989;7:557-559.

39.

Veatch RM : A theory of medicalethics.New York, Basic Books, Inc., 1981:216-226

40.

Novack DH . Detering BJ , Arnold R , et al: Physician's attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems. JAMA, 1989;261:2980-2985

41.

Taylor KM , Shapiro M , Soskolne CL Margolese RG : Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials. Cancer, 1987;60: 1415-1422

42.

President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical Research: Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: A report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1987

43.

Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana Press and the Hastings Center, 1987

44.

Wolf SM :“Near death“ in the moment of decision, NEJM 1990;322:208-210

45.

Viswanathan R : Should AIDS patients be told their diagnosis? In Lampke RS , Fismna M , Kutscher , et al. (eds.): Perspectives on the AIDS Crisis: Thanatologic Aspects. New York, Found of Thanatology, 1989:64-69

46.

Bayer R , Callahan D , Fletcher J , et al: The care of the terminally ill: Morality and economics. NEJM 1983;309:1490-1494

47.

Hirshfeld EB :Economic considerations in treatment decisions and the standard of care in medical malpractice litigation. JAMA 1990;264-2004-2012

48.

Uhlmann RF , Pearlman R , Cain KC . Physicians’ and spouses’predictions of elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences. J of Gerontol: Med Sci 1988;43:M115-M121

49.

Zweibel NIR , Cassel CK : Treatment choices at theend of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. The Gerontol 1989;29(5):615-621

50.

Angell M : Prisoners of technology. The case of Nancy Cruzan. NEJM 1990;322:1226-1228

51.

Lo B , Rouse F , Dombrand L : Family decision making on trial. Who decides for incompetent patients? NEJM 1990;322:3288-3293

52.

Emanuel LL , Emanuel EJ . The medical directive. A new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA 1989;261:2411-2414

53.

Orenthcher D : Advance medical directives. JAMA 1990;263:2365-2367

54.

Churchifi L : Trust, autonomy, and advance directives. J of Religion and Health 1989;28(3):175-183

55.

Smedira NG , Evans BH , Grais LS . et al: With holding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. NEJM 1990;322:309-315

56.

Wolf SM : “Near death” in the moment of decision. NEJM 1990;322:208-210