Qualitative sampling methods have been largely ignored in technical communication texts, making this concept difficult to teach in graduate courses on research methods. Using concepts from qualitative health research, this article provides a primer on qualitative methods as an initial effort to fill this gap in the technical communication literature. Specifically, the authors attempt to clarify some of the current confusion over qualitative sampling terminology, explain what qualitative sampling methods are and why they need to be implemented, and offer examples of how to apply commonly used qualitative sampling methods.
Barton, E. (2000). More methodological matters: Against negative argumentation. College Composition and Communication, 51, 399-416.
2.
Barton, E. (2001). Design in observational research on the discourse of medicine: Toward disciplined interdisciplinarity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 309-332.
3.
Berkenkotter, C. (2002). Analyzing everyday texts in organizational settings . In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 47-66). Westport, CT: Praeger .
4.
Blakeslee, A., & Fleischer, C. (2007). Becoming a writing researcher. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Britt, E.C. (2001). Conceiving normalcy: Rhetoric, law, and the double binds of infertility. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
6.
Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 12, 176-181.
7.
Campbell, K.S. (1999). Qualitative research methods for solving workplace problems. Technical Communication, 46, 532-545.
8.
Carliner, S. (1994). A call to research. Technical Communication, 41, 615-619.
9.
Charmaz, K.C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New York: Sage.
10.
Charney, D. (1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47, 567-593.
11.
Charney, D. (2001). Guest editor's introduction: Prospects for research in technical and scientific communication-Part 1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 267-268.
12.
Coyne, I.T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-630.
13.
Giacomini, M.K., & Cook, D.J. (2000). Users' guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B: What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 478-482.
14.
Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
15.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Goubil-Gambrell, P. (1992). A practitioner's guide to research methods. Technical Communication, 39, 582-591.
17.
Graham, M.L., Ward, B., Munro, G., Snow, P., & Ellis, J. (2006). Rural parents, teenagers and alcohol: What are parents thinking? Rural Remote Health, 6(1), 383.
18.
Gurak, L., & Lay, M. M. (Eds.). (2002). Research in technical communication. Westport, CT: Praeger .
19.
Haas, C., & Witte, S.P. (2001). Writing as an embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 15, 413-457.
20.
Hayhoe, G. (1997). What research do we need, and why should practitioners care? Technical Communication, 44, 19-21.
Hoddinott, P., & Pill, R. (1999). Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. British Medical Journal , 318, 30-34.
23.
Hughes, M.A., & Hayhoe, G.F. (2007). A research primer for technical communication . New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S.A. (2004). Central works in technical communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Katz, S.M. (2002). Ethnographic research. In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 23-46). Westport, CT : Praeger.
26.
Lindlof, T.R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods: Vol. 3. Current communication: An advanced text series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MacNealy, M.S. (1999). Strategies for empirical research in writing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
28.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50-52.
29.
Murphy, D.J. (2002). Surveys and questionnaires. In L. Gurak & M. M. Lay (Eds.), Research in technical communication (pp. 93-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
Paskiewicz, L.S. (2001). Pregnant adolescents and their mothers. A shared experience of teen mothering. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 26(1), 33-38.
31.
Porter, L.R., & Coggin, W. (1995). Research strategies in technical communication . New York: John Wiley.
32.
PubMed [Data file]. Retrieved in 2007 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
33.
Rickly, R. (2007). Messy contexts: Research as a rhetorical situation . In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 377-398). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
Savage, G.J. (2003). The process and prospects for professionalizing technical communication. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication: Vol. 1. The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 137-168). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
35.
Simmons, V. (2002). Exploring inconsistent breastfeeding advice: 2 . British Journal of Midwifery, 10, 616-619.
36.
Spilka, R. (2000). The issue of quality in professional documentation . Technical Communication Quarterly, 9, 207-220.
37.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
38.
Tuckett, A.G. (2004). Qualitative research sampling: The very real complexities . Nurse Researcher, 12(1), 47-61.
39.
Waitzkin, H. (1990). On studying the discourse of medical encounters: A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and a proposal for reasonable compromise. Medical Care, 28, 473-488.
40.
Winsor, D. (2006). Using writing to structure agency: An examination of engineers' practice. Technical Communication Quarterly , 15, 411-430.
