Carolyn Miller's “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing” serves as an example of text that has influenced the knowledge-making activities within technical communication. The 68 references, or intertextual connections, to “Humanistic Rationale” between 1979 and 1995 demonstrate its influence and show the evolution of technical communication and the issues important to technical communication professionals. The authors respond to questions of the purpose of technical communication, the influence of the canons of rhetoric, the importance of audience, and the impact of social constructionism on technical communication. This analysis of the academic prose surrounding “Humanistic Rationale” reveals part of the discipline's discussions and the “communal rationality” (617) that shapes the activities of its members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, Jo
. “The Case Against Defining Technical Writing.”JBTC4 (1990): 68-77.
2.
Allen, Jo
. “The Question Isn't `Could' But `Should': The Case Against Using Fiction in the Introductory Technical Writing Class.”The Technical Writing Teacher16 (1989): 211-219.
3.
Allen, Jo
. “Thematic Repetition as Rhetorical Technique.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication21 (1991): 29-40.
4.
Anderson, Paul V.“The Need for Better Research in Technical Communication.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication10 (1980): 271-281.
5.
Anderson, W. Steve
, and Michael Kleine. “Excellent Writing: Educating the Whole Corporation.”JBTC2 (1988): 49-62.
6.
Barker, Thomas T.“Word Processors and Invention in Technical Writing.”The Technical Writing Teacher16 (1989): 126-135.
7.
Barton, Ben F.
, and Marthalee S. Barton. “Communication Models for Computer-Mediated Information Systems.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication14 (1984): 289-305.
8.
Barton, Ben F.
, and Marthalee S. Barton. “The Nature and Treatment of Professional Engineering Problems: The Technical Writing Teacher's Responsibility.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication13 (1983): 355-368.
9.
Barton, Ben F.
, and Marthalee S. Barton. “Postmodernism and the Relation of Word and Image in Professional Discourse.”The Technical Writing Teacher17 (1990): 256-270.
10.
Bazerman, Charles
. “Intertextual Self-Fashioning: Gould and Lewontin's Representations of the Literature.”Understanding Scientific Prose. Ed. Jack Selzer. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993. 20-41.
11.
Blyler, Nancy Roundy
. “Shared Meaning and Public Relations Writing.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication22 (1992): 301-318.
12.
Blyler, Nancy Roundy
. “Theory and Curriculum: Reexamining the Curricular Separation of Business and Technical Communication.”JBTC7 (1993): 218-245.
13.
Bocchi, Joseph S.“Forming Constructs of Audience: Convention, Conflict, and Conversation.”JBTC5 (1991): 151-172.
14.
Bosley, Deborah
. “Gender and Visual Communication: Toward a Feminist Theory of Design.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication35 (1992): 222-229.
15.
Brockmann, R. John
. “Taking a Second Look at Technical Communications Pedagogy.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication10 (1980): 283-291.
16.
Charney, Davida H.
, Jack Rayman, and Linda Ferreira-Buckley. “How Writing Quality Influences Readers' Judgments of Résumés in Business and Engineering.”JBTC6 (1992): 38-74.
17.
Clark, Gregory
. “Ethics in Technical Communication: A Rhetorical Perspective.”IEEE Transactions on Professional CommunicationPC-30 (1987): 190-196.
18.
Coney, Mary B.“Technical Readers and Their Rhetorical Roles.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication35 (1992): 58-63.
19.
Cozzens, Susan E.“Comparing the Sciences: Citation Context Analysis of Papers from Neuropharmacology and the Sociology of Science.”Social Studies of Science15 (1985): 127-153.
20.
Dobrin, David N.“What's the Purpose of Teaching Technical Communication?”The Technical Writing Teacher12 (1985): 146-160.
21.
Dombrowski, Paul M.“Challenger and the Social Contingency of Meaning: Two Lessons for the Technical Communication Classroom.”Technical Communication Quarterly1.3 (1992): 73-86.
22.
Dombrowski, Paul M.
. “Challenger through the Eyes of Feyerabend.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication24 (1994): 7-18.
23.
Dombrowski, Paul M.
. “The Lessons of the Challenger Investigations.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication34 (1991): 211-216.
24.
Dombrowski, Paul M.
. “Post-Modernism as the Resurgence of Humanism in Technical Communication Studies.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 165-185.
25.
Dragga, Sam
, and Gwendolyn Gong. Editing: The Design of Rhetoric. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 1989.
26.
Elliot, Norbert
, and Margaret Kilduff. “Technical Writing in a Technological University: Attitudes of Department Chairs.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication21 (1991): 411-424.
27.
Elliot, Norbert
, and Paul Zelhart. “Hermeneutics and the Teaching of Technical Writing.”The Technical Writing Teacher17 (1990): 150-164.
28.
Fearing, Bertie
, and W. Keats Sparrow, eds. Technical Writing: Theory and Practice. New York: Modern Language Association, 1989.
Gurak, Laura J.
, and Nancy L. Bayer. “Making Gender Visible: Extending Feminist Critiques of Technology to Technical Communication.”Technical Communication Quarterly3 (1994): 257-270.
31.
Hagge, John
. “Early Engineering Writing Textbooks and the Anthropological Complexity of Disciplinary Discourse.”Written Communication12 (1995): 439-491.
32.
Hagge, John
. “Ethics, Words, and the World in Moore's and Miller's Accounts of Scientific and Technical Discourse.”JBTC10 (1996): 461-475.
33.
Hairston, Maxine
. “The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing.”College Composition and Communication33 (1982): 76-88.
34.
Jones, Daniel R.“Exploring Quality: What Robert Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance Can Teach Us about Technical Communication.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication32 (1989): 154-158.
35.
Jones, Daniel R.
. “A Rhetorical Approach for Teaching the Literature of Scientific and Technical Writing.”The Technical Writing Teacher12 (1985): 115-125.
36.
Journet, Debra
. “Rhetoric and Sociobiology.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication14 (1984): 339-350.
37.
Katz, Steven B.“Aristotle's Rhetoric, Hitler's Program, and the Ideological Problem of Praxis, Power, and Professional Discourse.”JBTC7 (1993): 37-62.
38.
Katz, Steven B.
. “The Epistemic Trend in Rhetorical Theory: A Four-Dimensional Review.”The Technical Writing Teacher14 (1987): 355-371.
39.
Killingsworth, M. Jimmie
. “The Essay and the Report: Expository Poles in Technical Writing.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication15 (1985): 227-233.
40.
Kreth, Melinda
. “Comments on `Instrumental Discourse Is as Humanistic as Rhetoric.' ”JBTC10 (1996): 476-482.
41.
Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
42.
LaDuc, Linda
, and Amanda Goldrick-Jones. “The Critical Eye, the Gendered Lens, and `Situated' Insights: Feminist Contributions to Professional Communication.”Technical Communication Quarterly3 (1994): 245-256.
43.
Lay, Mary M.“Feminist Theory and the Redefinition of Technical Communication.”JBTC5 (1991): 348-370.
44.
Lay, Mary M.
. “Images of Technology and Creativity: In Opposition or Harmony within Technical Communications Programs?”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication31 (1988): 184-188.
45.
Lutz, Jean
, Susan Jarratt, Patricia Harkin, and Mary Beth Debs. “Practical Rhetoric: The Art of Composing.”The Technical Writing Teacher14 (1987): 300-317.
46.
Lyon, Arabella
. “Paideia to Pedantry: The Dissolving Relationship of the Humanities and Society.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication18 (1988): 55-62.
47.
MacDonald, Susan Peck
. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994.
48.
Manning, Alan D.“Literary vs. Technical Writing: Substitutes vs. Standards for Reality.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication18 (1988): 241-262.
49.
Markel, Mike
. “Criteria Development and the Myth of Objectivity.”The Technical Writing Teacher18 (1991): 37-47.
50.
Markel, Mike
. “Induction, Social Constructionism, and the Form of the Science Paper.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication23 (1993): 7-22.
51.
Martin, Wanda
, and Scott Sanders. “Ethics, Audience, and the Writing Process: Bringing Public Policy Issues into the Classroom.”Technical Communication Quarterly3 (1994): 147-163.
52.
Miller, Carolyn R.“Comments on `Instrumental Discourse Is as Humanistic as Rhetoric.' ”JBTC10 (1996): 482-486.
53.
Miller, Carolyn R.
. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.”College English40 (1979): 610-617.
54.
Moore, Patrick
. “Instrumental Discourse Is as Humanistic as Rhetoric.”JBTC10 (1996): 100-118.
55.
Moore, Patrick
. “A Response to Miller and Kreth.”JBTC10 (1996): 491-502.
56.
Paradis, James
, David Dobrin, and Richard Miller. “Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the Writing Environment of an R&D Organization.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 281-307.
57.
Parsons, Gerald M.“Ethical Factors Influencing Curriculum Design and Instruction in Technical Communication.”IEEE Transactions on Professional CommunicationPC-30 (1987): 202-207.
58.
Parsons, Gerald M.
. “Why I Don't Believe in the `Real World' Anymore.”The Technical Writing Teacher16 (1988): 42-51.
59.
Paul, Terri
, and Mary Rosner. “Discovering and Teaching Syntactic Structures in Three Technical Disciplines.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication13 (1983): 109-122.
60.
Petersen, Bruce T.“Conceptual Patterns in Industrial and Academic Discourse.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication14 (1984): 95-107.
61.
Phillips, Donna Burns
, Ruth Greenberg, and Sharon Gibson. “College Composition and Communication: Chronicling a Discipline's Genesis.”College Composition and Communication44 (1993): 443-465.
62.
Redish, Janice
. “Comments on `Instrumental Discourse Is as Humanistic as Rhetoric.' ”JBTC10 (1996): 486-490.
63.
Rentz, Kathryn C.“Literary Genre Theory and the Teaching of Professional Writing Forms.”The Technical Writing Teacher16 (1988): 196-208.
64.
Reynolds, John Frederick
. “Classical Rhetoric and the Teaching of Technical Writing.”Technical Communication Quarterly1.2 (1992): 63-76.
65.
Rosner, Mary
. “Putting `This and That Together' to Question Sentence-Combining Research.”The Technical Writing Teacher11 (1985): 221-228.
66.
Rosner, Mary
. “Style and Audience in Technical Writing: Advice from the Early Texts.”The Technical Writing Teacher11 (1983): 38-45.
67.
Russell, David R.“The Ethics of Teaching Ethics in Professional Communication: The Case of Engineering Publicity at MIT in the 1920s.”JBTC7 (1993): 84-111.
68.
Rutter, Russell
. “History, Rhetoric, and Humanism: Toward a More Comprehensive Definition of Technical Communication.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication21 (1991): 133-153.
69.
Samuels, Marilyn Schauer
. “Is Technical Communication `Literature'? Current Writing Scholarship and Vico's Cycles of Knowledge.”JBTC1 (1987): 48-67.
70.
Samuels, Marilyn Schauer
. “Technical Writing and the Recreation of Reality.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication15 (1985): 3-13.
71.
Sanders, Scott P.“Practice, Proficiency, Professionalism.”IEEE Transactions on Professional CommunicationPC-29 (1986): 15-18.
72.
Sauer, Beverly A.“The Engineer as Rational Man: The Problem of Imminent Danger in a Non-Rational Environment.”IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication35 (1992): 242-249.
73.
Schriver, Karen A.“Document Design from 1980 to 1989: Challenges That Remain.”Technical Communication36 (1989): 316-331.
74.
Schroll, Christopher J.“Technology and Communication Ethics: An Evaluative Framework.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 147-164.
75.
Scott, J. Blake
. “Sophistic Ethics in the Technical Writing Classroom: Teaching Nomos, Deliberation, and Action.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 187-199.
76.
Selzer, Jack
. “Intertextuality and the Writing Process.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 171-180.
77.
Small, Henry G.“Cited Documents as Concept Symbols.”Social Studies of Science8 (1978): 327-340.
78.
Smith, Elizabeth Overman. “The Forums, Profession, and Discipline of Technical Communication, 1971-1992.” Diss. Texas Tech University, 1994. DAI 56 (1995): 01A.
79.
Smith, Robert E., III.“Rhetoric as Social Act: Cicero and the Technical Writing Model.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication22 (1992): 337-355.
Stoddard, Eve Walsh
. “The Role of Ethos in the Theory of Technical Writing.”The Technical Writing Teacher11 (1985): 229-241.
82.
Thompson, Isabelle
. “An Educational Philosophy of Technical Writing.”Technical Communication Quarterly1.2 (1992): 33-46.
83.
Westmoreland, Kay
. “A Semiotic Perspective on the Technical and Professional Writing Assignment.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 125-146.
84.
Winsor, Dorothy A.“The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions about the Challenger.”JBTC4 (1990): 7-20.
85.
Zappen, James P.“The Discourse Community in Scientific and Technical Communication: Institutional and Social Views.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication19 (1989): 1-11.
86.
Zappen, James P.
. “Historical Studies in the Rhetoric of Science and Technology.”The Technical Writing Teacher14 (1987): 283-298.
87.
Zappen, James P.
. “Rhetoric and Technical Communication: An Argument for Historical and Political Pluralism.”JBTC1 (1987): 29-44.
88.
Zimmerman, Beverly
. “Metaphor, Frame, and Nonverbal Communication: An Ethnographic Study of a Technical Writing Classroom.”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication36 (1993): 137-143.
